Go Back   Tactical Gamer > Mass Multiplayer > Age Of Conan: Hyborian Adventures > Age Of Conan - General Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-17-2008, 01:53 PM   #1 (permalink)
Jusb
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Age: 29
Posts: 883
Ummm...a little confused?

I've been lurking in this forum since it was added. I'm considering getting AoC, but I'm a little reluctant after trying to help others get LOTR off the ground for TG and watching it fade to nothing. I'm not really interested in playing another MMO with about 2-4 people on randomly so....I guess these are my questions:

What is the consensus for servers? Looking through most of the threads it looks like TG is going to be spread over 3 (really 3?) servers. Are the selections for the TG guild server final, or are you guys (whoever is mostly in charge) still kind of working things out?

Are these servers that are chosen early release servers? Basically, are they going to be close to full when a bunch of TGers try to join post release?

What are the (rough) numbers of TG members expected to be on each of the 3 servers we have stuff goin on?

Thanks for any answers. I'm not trying to question anything, just trying to get a feel if this is worth my time...after how terrible FFOW and LTRO have worked out for me - heh.
__________________
Long Live the 2nd BCT and 1st MIP.
Now Playing:
*AoC **Korvalis **Server: Cimmeria
*COD4 **Tag: JusB
*GTAIV **GT: HitnRun14
Jusb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 02:59 PM   #2 (permalink)
Rincewind
 
Rincewind's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Casting useless spells in Oklahoma.
Age: 27
Posts: 2,659
Re: Ummm...a little confused?

I hear you Jusb. There's been a lot of time to iron these things out, but I'm still a little confused at the direction TG is taking with AoC.
__________________
~~ Veritas simplex oratio est ~~
No matter how far a wizard goes, he will always come back for his hat. --T. Pratchett

<---- You know you're getting old when you rely on your forum meta-data to remind you how old you are.

Required Reading for all TG sandboxers
Rincewind is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 05-17-2008, 03:01 PM   #3 (permalink)
daithi1

 
daithi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 875
Re: Ummm...a little confused?

TG will have a PvP server and a PvE server. Serveral mebers of the 3rd have decided to make their own RP-PvP guild. So essetially there is three but only two are strictly 'TG'.
__________________
|TG-AIR|Daithi1



* 11th Air Tactical Wiki*Make Somebody Warm and Fuzzy, Ribbon Nomination*Lost? Try TG Mentoring*


daithi1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 03:32 PM   #4 (permalink)
TheFatKidDeath
 
TheFatKidDeath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Age: 39
Posts: 2,464
Re: Ummm...a little confused?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rincewind View Post
I hear you Jusb. There's been a lot of time to iron these things out, but I'm still a little confused at the direction TG is taking with AoC.
"There's been a lot of time to iron these things out" Really? The game was just released today (for those with early access) and many details FunCom has been quite about. Many players, including myself, have yet to play the retail game. It may time some time to flesh things and see what direction we are taking with AOC.

Jusb, welcome, and to your questions:

Two servers have been picked: PVP and PVE for the main TG Guild. The 3rd has opted to play the PVP-RP server and start a Guild with their own forums. If you want to play on an PVP-RP server I recommend you join them. The main TG forum Guild will be PVP and PVE. I opted to have both a PVP and PVE to satisfy 50% of the player base as we took a poll and it was roughly down the middle (I saw very few hands raised for PVP-RP if any). Take your pick on which you want to play. I personally will try both PVP and PVE.

Right now we are fleshing out where we want to be: PVP, PVE or perhaps PVE-RP. I cannot give you specific details on where we will end up the game was just released hours ago. Hopefully we can accomdate everyone's play stlye and not drive away players.

Will Age Of Conan be a success here at TG? We hope so and are trying to promote the game, get players excited and provide an atomsphere where everyone can find a server and play type. Stay tuned.
__________________
|TG-9th| TheFatKidDeath
"Born to Party, Forced to Work."
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/55640 - Check me out on The Onion
http://www.theonion.com/content/vide...ssfully_avoids - I'm on the local news!
TheFatKidDeath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 03:34 PM   #5 (permalink)
Humvee
 
Humvee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: St. Louis
Age: 18
Posts: 127
Re: Ummm...a little confused?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jusb View Post
What is the consensus for servers? Looking through most of the threads it looks like TG is going to be spread over 3 (really 3?) servers. Are the selections for the TG guild server final, or are you guys (whoever is mostly in charge) still kind of working things out?
Unfortounatly it looks that way. Although there hasn't been time to chat about all the PvP people going to the RP-PvP server to join the 3rd.
I think this is the most logical answer, as it is a win-win situation.
The PvE players are the minority, but you can't blame their desire to explore without getting ganked.
Humvee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 03:38 PM   #6 (permalink)
Turbinator
 
Turbinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,074
Re: Ummm...a little confused?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jusb View Post
I've been lurking in this forum since it was added. I'm considering getting AoC, but I'm a little reluctant after trying to help others get LOTR off the ground for TG and watching it fade to nothing. I'm not really interested in playing another MMO with about 2-4 people on randomly so....I guess these are my questions:

What is the consensus for servers? Looking through most of the threads it looks like TG is going to be spread over 3 (really 3?) servers. Are the selections for the TG guild server final, or are you guys (whoever is mostly in charge) still kind of working things out?

Are these servers that are chosen early release servers? Basically, are they going to be close to full when a bunch of TGers try to join post release?

What are the (rough) numbers of TG members expected to be on each of the 3 servers we have stuff goin on?

Thanks for any answers. I'm not trying to question anything, just trying to get a feel if this is worth my time...after how terrible FFOW and LTRO have worked out for me - heh.
hey jusb,

well 1st thing first LOtro is no AOC, those that played lotro simply tried new mmo or were/are fans of tolkien, it has zero pvp(I dont count monster play).

AoC is 1st mmo with lots and lots of pvp options, more then any mmo since shadowbane it appears.

We have a large TG following for AoC, quiet a few are in early access (hows that going btw ), the only reason if the game dies if Seige battles (end game) utterly fails.
__________________
Turbinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 05-17-2008, 03:39 PM   #7 (permalink)
Grieg
 
Grieg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 378
Re: Ummm...a little confused?

Beta / early access people are guinea pigs. They use us to gather data about how their hardware will hold up, software problems, etc.

This should be expected.
__________________



Govern well thy appetite, lest Sin surprise thee, and her black attendant: Death. ~ John Milton - Paradise Lost

| TG Primer | Rules of Conduct | Wearing the |TG| tag | TG CoD4 Server Rules |

Grieg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 03:40 PM   #8 (permalink)
TheFatKidDeath
 
TheFatKidDeath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Age: 39
Posts: 2,464
Re: Ummm...a little confused?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Humvee View Post
Unfortounatly it looks that way. Although there hasn't been time to chat about all the PvP people going to the RP-PvP server to join the 3rd.
I think this is the most logical answer, as it is a win-win situation.
The PvE players are the minority, but you can't blame their desire to explore without getting ganked.
You must have not read my post above you. Secondly, your the one who said "Well, seeing as the radical PvE players have a stronger point than the radical PvP players (that including myself) ill switch my PvP vote over to PvE."

http://www.tacticalgamer.com/age-con...r-guild-2.html

Now, you want everyone on the PVP-RP sever? Now, I'm confused.
__________________
|TG-9th| TheFatKidDeath
"Born to Party, Forced to Work."
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/55640 - Check me out on The Onion
http://www.theonion.com/content/vide...ssfully_avoids - I'm on the local news!

Last edited by TheFatKidDeath; 05-17-2008 at 03:56 PM.
TheFatKidDeath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 04:00 PM   #9 (permalink)
Humvee
 
Humvee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: St. Louis
Age: 18
Posts: 127
Re: Ummm...a little confused?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFatKidDeath View Post
You must have not read my post above you.
Considering you posted it 2minutes before me- no i didnt see it.

But we still didn't solve anything. The change from PvP to RP-PvP is... well... pretty much no change at all. Why not just boot the whole PvP server idea out and make it RP-PvP.

For Tfkd's defense, we truely tried to iron things out. It takes people voicing opinions and developers words to get everything straight before hand. Honoestly, i think we did a good job, it's hard to satisfy everyone.

As far as the newly introduced culture pvp... i say screw it. It's still in the works and i can bet you that the Bane server is going to be Funcom's dirty gueinne pig.

You know why i switched my vote.... because i wanted everyone on the same server. But now since we've decided to seperate ill go with what my heart desires, PVP, and since 3rd has settled on a server, why not join them?
Humvee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 04:10 PM   #10 (permalink)
Rincewind
 
Rincewind's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Casting useless spells in Oklahoma.
Age: 27
Posts: 2,659
Re: Ummm...a little confused?

You can't please everyone. In my opinion, you should pick one direction to go. If the game is strong, folks wont care what rule set they play under as long as they're playing with TG.

I'm afraid that fractioning in the very beginning will hurt the chances of either TG guild to succeed.
__________________
~~ Veritas simplex oratio est ~~
No matter how far a wizard goes, he will always come back for his hat. --T. Pratchett

<---- You know you're getting old when you rely on your forum meta-data to remind you how old you are.

Required Reading for all TG sandboxers
Rincewind is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 05-18-2008, 12:54 PM   #11 (permalink)
Gambit7
 
Gambit7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hollywood, FL
Age: 31
Posts: 1,636
Re: Ummm...a little confused?

If a game is wack, there's nothing you can do to keep numbers in-game. LotRO was/is a pretty good game, but the gameplay was pretty stale for much of the beginning and hence participation suffered. TR had GREAT gameplay from the get-go, but the game got stale and grindy later on and poof... no more participation - even with HEAVY recruiting.

So far with AoC... I think we have a winner here. It's not gonna be hard to fill the ranks. If they're not filled it's because someone dropped the ball. Regardless, even if the ranks get thin you've got the 3rd on the RP server (Cimmeria) and FocusedGaming on the PvE server (Zug) to play with. You've also got Alliances (with website support) already being formed to help people find groups and keep protected on PvP servers. So no worries.
__________________
Gambit7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 01:06 PM   #12 (permalink)
SharinganTH1422
 
SharinganTH1422's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: East London, England, UK
Age: 18
Posts: 1,100
Re: Ummm...a little confused?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gambit7 View Post
FocusedGaming on the PvE server (Zug).
Oh, so the 7th have taken to this...that's interesting, and actually it will allow the PvE'ers to have an alliance, and if the focusedgamers are as good at MMOing as they are at FPSing, then they'll be a powerful ally, and the same can obviously be said of the 3rd.
__________________
Anger is a gift - Malcolm X
BF2142 - Sharingan1422


SharinganTH1422 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 02:52 PM   #13 (permalink)
Gambit7
 
Gambit7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hollywood, FL
Age: 31
Posts: 1,636
Re: Ummm...a little confused?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SharinganTH1422 View Post
Oh, so the 7th have taken to this...that's interesting, and actually it will allow the PvE'ers to have an alliance, and if the focusedgamers are as good at MMOing as they are at FPSing, then they'll be a powerful ally, and the same can obviously be said of the 3rd.
They may have some folk over on the RP-PVP also... LoL
__________________
Gambit7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 03:56 PM   #14 (permalink)
Turbinator
 
Turbinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,074
Re: Ummm...a little confused?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rincewind View Post
You can't please everyone. In my opinion, you should pick one direction to go. If the game is strong, folks wont care what rule set they play under as long as they're playing with TG.

I'm afraid that fractioning in the very beginning will hurt the chances of either TG guild to succeed.
I cared, TG went with PVE in WoW, I wanted pvp and I went PVP, so people do care .
__________________
Turbinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
©2004-2008 - Tactical Gamer - All Rights Reserved