![]() |


|
|||||||
| Battlefield 2142 - General Discussion General discussion for Battlefield 2142 |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 353
|
Should FF=OFF also = NON RANKED?
Honestly after playing alot of titan, I've come to the conclusion that FF being off is completely bogus. But fair enough many people like it, but I think they should either A: Half the XP from those games, or B: Make them non-ranked completely.
Just voicing an oppinion |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bethesda, MD, USA
Posts: 741
|
Re: Should FF=OFF also = NON RANKED?
Personally, I think FF should be on because it makes a consequence for your actions. So you can't just run around crazy with grenades and stuff. I don't think they should be non-ranked but I do think FF makes it more fair for ranking as you can lose points.
__________________
lTG-AIRl DrBeat
![]() *TG's Ladies'/Gentlemen's Agreement* *11th Airborne Tactical Wiki.* *Become a Supporting Member!* *Know Someone Outstanding? Nominate them for a Ribbon!* ![]() Every Friday, I trade my dignity for a hat with a furry white chicken on top. On Saturdays, I trade that hat for a black and white fedora. 140 hours (and counting) spent in marching band this year. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Austintown, Ohio
Age: 36
Posts: 2,425
|
Re: Should FF=OFF also = NON RANKED?
I think so, but the community at large when never accept it. Therefore, as a business practice, a publisher/designer like EA/DICE would never make such a bold step in that direction.
__________________
Ikariam (Alpha) Toruos[44:84]>Non Sequitur(c)-Sulfur :: Nyyos[44:85]>Obesa Cantavit-Wine Tiaayos[43:84]>Stercus Accidit-Marble :: Emytia[45:85]>Vacca Foeda-Crystal Nyyos[44:85]>Obesus Porcus-Wine |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northeastern University (Boston)
Age: 21
Posts: 3,816
|
Re: Should FF=OFF also = NON RANKED?
Yeah, its a completely different, and easier game. As Draeh said though, it caters to the majority.
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Proud to have been an IRRegular! "Brittle?! Dude you just took a localized tactical warhead to the face." -Eroak |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 108
|
Re: Should FF=OFF also = NON RANKED?
The entire reason I'm a member of TG is because of FF OFF servers. I originally started playing this game with two other friends and they were always playing on this server where FF was OFF. Every now and then I would be able to play with them and I remember specifically this guy would come down to the Camp Gibi UCB and throw down some RDX then start bunny hopping all over the place.
After I started playing on the TG servers I realized just how pathetic the server was. I tried getting them to come over but after they played one time on a TG server and got mad owned even without the Jihad Jeeps, Bunny Hoppers, or Base Rapers they quit playing the game.
__________________
"Instead of shooting where I was, you should have shot at where I was going to be!" Commander Lur, Futurama, Raiders of the Lost Arcade. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In a AC-130 shooting 105's at you.
Age: 28
Posts: 3,139
|
Re: Should FF=OFF also = NON RANKED?
You'll always have a split opinion for this topic. But I think I can safely say that all of us have no issue with FF=ON. But it is neat to watch people fly 100+ meters in to air and kill gunships with paracutes
__________________
![]() Do you know your roots? R.I.P. Lost Fires - June 16, 2001 - June 18, 2008 An EverQuest guild - We miss you Faylon |
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4
|
Re: Should FF=OFF also = NON RANKED?
They should make gunships out of parachutes. And those lamp poles that render at 10 meters on Tampa...
As long as FF=ON servers aren't empty, they can RDX spam all they want and get to Brigadier General before me. I mean, it's their right to play the game, isn't it? And as long as nobody is making me play on FF=OFF servers I'm perfectly fine with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Castle, DE
Age: 40
Posts: 1,750
|
Re: Should FF=OFF also = NON RANKED?
I personally think that FF off takes away from the intent of the game to provide a simulation of combat that we can all experience and "enjoy". I have never agreed with it and probably never will.
__________________
![]() "No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country." - General George Patton Jr ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Acknowledge your teammates' Outstanding and Distinguished efforts: Submit a nomination |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Austintown, Ohio
Age: 36
Posts: 2,425
|
Re: Should FF=OFF also = NON RANKED?
Quote:
Catch my drift?
__________________
Ikariam (Alpha) Toruos[44:84]>Non Sequitur(c)-Sulfur :: Nyyos[44:85]>Obesa Cantavit-Wine Tiaayos[43:84]>Stercus Accidit-Marble :: Emytia[45:85]>Vacca Foeda-Crystal Nyyos[44:85]>Obesus Porcus-Wine |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Roanoke, VA
Age: 19
Posts: 89
|
Re: Should FF=OFF also = NON RANKED?
You know what's incredibly stupid about FF=Off in this game? It also disables self-damage.
Seriously, FF=Off would be much more viable with self-damage on. Solves the whole RDX bunny-hopper problem quite nicely. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Mountain Home AFB, ID
Posts: 856
|
Re: Should FF=OFF also = NON RANKED?
How would I propel myself over buildings in daring aerial assaults then?
I can see FF being forced on in some games, but I should hope that game would actually ship with decent admin tools, like those mod ones for HL2. Frankly, any server that isn't able to support a decent admin team has no business being up in the first place.
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|

