server rule: squad required?

**Wyzcrak** · 06-12-2005, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RGM-79N_GM_CUstom

Maybe we should consider making it part of our server rules that you have to be in a squad.

Is there any good reason NOT to do this?

**asch** · 06-12-2005, 08:21 PM

Interesting idea. That could be good and bad.

Are we limited to the number of squads? We could have 64 one man squads.... would someone join a squad to appease the rule but then not work with the squad? Just food for thought... but I do like the idea.

Iamevil · 06-12-2005, 08:46 PM

There should definatly be a rule to be in a squad.

Running around on your own doesnt help anyone.

**Vulcan** · 06-12-2005, 08:47 PM

there is every reason, this game is Horrid if people aren't playing the way it's supposed to be played. If it were me i'd make it so you had to choose a squad to join the game.

It was absolute chaos on the server when it opened up so public people could join.

iceman369 · 06-12-2005, 09:05 PM

yea its a good idea all you have to do is find someone you get along with and form a squad. It should be required though for another couple weeks after the real game comes out.

ice

**Tempus** · 06-12-2005, 09:06 PM

Absolutely! If you are not in a squad, you cannot communicate.

iceman369 · 06-12-2005, 09:37 PM

in that case you have to in a squad in order to join TG server

Iamevil · 06-12-2005, 09:47 PM

We need to make sure people in squads communicate as well, I was just in 3 different squads and none of them communicated or worked together, it seems only the TG and TGS people actually do that.

Zephyr · 06-12-2005, 11:27 PM

I dont think squad required is what we really need to push, we need to push mic required. Push mic required and squads will form up automatically because anyone with a mic knows the advantage of having one, especially in battlefield 2.
-Zephyr

**Wyzcrak** · 06-13-2005, 01:14 AM

Mic required won't fly.

Trust me. I've been down that road.

**RGM-79N_GM_CUstom** · 06-13-2005, 01:16 AM

I don't think we should require mics we don't on the NS server or CS server or any TG server I have been on so far why start now.

ouija · 06-13-2005, 01:24 AM

All for the squad requirement...

...also would be for a autoban on any ratbastard helicopter pilot who thinks it cool to hover low over a flag to capture the base, versus actually landing and doing it the correct way. (Sorry, people were ticking me off with this "tactic" all night.)

Karkianman101 · 06-13-2005, 01:45 AM

If I find an enemy helicopter low at the ground, he gets a facefull of grenade launcher. What I would love to see would be some system to vote people off squads, and out of squad leader position.

**kormendi** · 06-13-2005, 02:09 AM

I think squads should be a requirement. But there should be a squad for people who want to go off on their own (if that type of player is helpful to the game (snipers?)).

A squad requirement helps control those who are either new (and dont want to learn) or don't want to play as a team.

**Wyzcrak** · 06-13-2005, 02:37 AM

I think hovering to capture a flag is perfectly valid.

06-12-2005, 08:21 PM	#2 (permalink)
asch Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Fort Mill, SC Age: 33 Posts: 9,696	Re: server rule: squad required? Interesting idea. That could be good and bad. Are we limited to the number of squads? We could have 64 one man squads.... would someone join a squad to appease the rule but then not work with the squad? Just food for thought... but I do like the idea.

06-12-2005, 08:46 PM	#3 (permalink)
Iamevil Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Down south in the north. Posts: 148	Re: server rule: squad required? There should definatly be a rule to be in a squad. Running around on your own doesnt help anyone.

06-12-2005, 08:47 PM	#4 (permalink)
Vulcan Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Montreal Age: 29 Posts: 6,825	Re: server rule: squad required? there is every reason, this game is Horrid if people aren't playing the way it's supposed to be played. If it were me i'd make it so you had to choose a squad to join the game. It was absolute chaos on the server when it opened up so public people could join. __________________ TG Primer - CSS SOP's - INS SOP's

06-12-2005, 09:05 PM	#5 (permalink)
iceman369 Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: MA Posts: 76	Re: server rule: squad required? yea its a good idea all you have to do is find someone you get along with and form a squad. It should be required though for another couple weeks after the real game comes out. ice

06-12-2005, 09:06 PM	#6 (permalink)
Tempus Join Date: May 2003 Location: Miami, FL Age: 38 Posts: 7,974	Re: server rule: squad required? Absolutely! If you are not in a squad, you cannot communicate. __________________ Battlefield 2/2142 Game Officer Contact me with server/player/admin issues. -- Suits are what you wear when doing things you shouldn’t want to do anyway. FROM THE TACTICAL GAMER PRIMER. 3) Support game play in a near-simulation environment. Where the focus of play would not be solely on doing what it takes to win, but doing so utilizing real-world combat strategy and tactics rather than leveraging exploits provided to players by the design of the game engine.

06-12-2005, 09:37 PM	#7 (permalink)
iceman369 Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: MA Posts: 76	Re: server rule: squad required? in that case you have to in a squad in order to join TG server

06-12-2005, 09:47 PM	#8 (permalink)
Iamevil Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Down south in the north. Posts: 148	Re: server rule: squad required? We need to make sure people in squads communicate as well, I was just in 3 different squads and none of them communicated or worked together, it seems only the TG and TGS people actually do that.

06-12-2005, 11:27 PM	#9 (permalink)
Zephyr Join Date: Apr 2004 Age: 20 Posts: 1,647	Re: server rule: squad required? I dont think squad required is what we really need to push, we need to push mic required. Push mic required and squads will form up automatically because anyone with a mic knows the advantage of having one, especially in battlefield 2. -Zephyr __________________ You were once like the newbie who needed a hand from above and TacticalGamer gave you it. You owe the newbie who comes after you that same outstretched hand from above on your honor as a Tactical Gamer. Tactics at TG come from trust and friendship, not meticulous detail and rigid discipline. Everyone should be assumed mature until proven otherwise. We are no clan. We are not a single game. We are mature, intelligent, and cooperative individuals. We are TacticalGamer, a community above and beyond its name.

06-13-2005, 01:14 AM	#10 (permalink)
Wyzcrak Join Date: May 2003 Location: Memphis, TN Posts: 14,132	Re: server rule: squad required? Mic required won't fly. Trust me. I've been down that road. __________________ Steam Community? Add me. \| Join #tacticalgamer \| Search Results Legend \| New Posts Forum Filter \| Postbox Toggle \| Live Thread Review \| One Line Results \| Free Remote, Encrypted Backup Darkilla: In short, NS is pretty much really fast chess. With guns. Apophis: I haven't seen anyone say that SM's are better than non-SMs. Nordbomber: This is THE first server I've seen where either side can comeback from out of seemingly nowhere with the right teamwork. en4rcment: I have NEVER experienced the type of gameplay that I have found here. Nightly I am amazed at the personalities and gaming talent. Root: Welcome to TG. Feel free to punctuate your sentences correctly. Monkerz: Its gonna take all my skills to beat those boys off in the future.

06-13-2005, 01:16 AM	#11 (permalink)
RGM-79N_GM_CUstom Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Paterson, New Jersey Age: 22 Posts: 2,128	Re: server rule: squad required? I don't think we should require mics we don't on the NS server or CS server or any TG server I have been on so far why start now. __________________ RX-78-2 Gundam EFSF Protoype Close Combat Mobile Suit Armor: Luna Titanium Armament: 2x Beam Sabers, 2x 60mm Head vulcan guns 380mm Hyper bazooka, Beam Rifle, Beam Javelin, Hyper Hammer, Gundam Hammer, shield TG Natural Selection admin. Need anything PM me. 7th Infantry FTW!!!!! "Snob? Nah...I consider myself more of a PC Evangelist...converting the heathens to The Way." Prophaniti "Windows is like Pokemon you gotta catch'em all." kenshinsama1

06-13-2005, 01:24 AM	#12 (permalink)
ouija Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Panama City, Florida Age: 35 Posts: 361	Re: server rule: squad required? All for the squad requirement... ...also would be for a autoban on any ratbastard helicopter pilot who thinks it cool to hover low over a flag to capture the base, versus actually landing and doing it the correct way. (Sorry, people were ticking me off with this "tactic" all night.) __________________ If it isn't PCS, whats the point? PM me with any questions or concerns. Professional Counterstrike (PCS) FAQ \| PCS Player Standards Aggressive Defense (an oxymoron): A naturally occurring situational event where a defender is caught in a role reversal anomaly. Usually associated with lack of practice, discipline or map awareness in a team based conflict.

06-13-2005, 01:45 AM	#13 (permalink)
Karkianman101 Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: East Lansing Age: 20 Posts: 1,545	Re: server rule: squad required? If I find an enemy helicopter low at the ground, he gets a facefull of grenade launcher. What I would love to see would be some system to vote people off squads, and out of squad leader position.

06-13-2005, 02:09 AM	#14 (permalink)
kormendi Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Fairfax, Virginia Age: 26 Posts: 2,142	Re: server rule: squad required? I think squads should be a requirement. But there should be a squad for people who want to go off on their own (if that type of player is helpful to the game (snipers?)). A squad requirement helps control those who are either new (and dont want to learn) or don't want to play as a team.

06-13-2005, 02:37 AM	#15 (permalink)
Wyzcrak Join Date: May 2003 Location: Memphis, TN Posts: 14,132	Re: server rule: squad required? I think hovering to capture a flag is perfectly valid. __________________ Steam Community? Add me. \| Join #tacticalgamer \| Search Results Legend \| New Posts Forum Filter \| Postbox Toggle \| Live Thread Review \| One Line Results \| Free Remote, Encrypted Backup Darkilla: In short, NS is pretty much really fast chess. With guns. Apophis: I haven't seen anyone say that SM's are better than non-SMs. Nordbomber: This is THE first server I've seen where either side can comeback from out of seemingly nowhere with the right teamwork. en4rcment: I have NEVER experienced the type of gameplay that I have found here. Nightly I am amazed at the personalities and gaming talent. Root: Welcome to TG. Feel free to punctuate your sentences correctly. Monkerz: Its gonna take all my skills to beat those boys off in the future.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
It's OUT!	Magnum50	America's Army - General Discussion	19	09-17-2006 08:52 PM
=US=Scrim Tactics Dragon Valley	NorCalRoach	Battlefield 2 - Tactics and Missions Discussion	38	09-15-2006 08:46 PM
Insight Into CO'ing	Preston85	Battlefield 2 - Tactics and Missions Discussion	10	09-14-2006 11:13 AM
How to help new Squad Leaders	Obi	Battlefield 2 - General Discussion	4	08-16-2005 01:12 PM