![]() |


|
|||||||
| Battlefield 2 - Tactics and Missions Discussion Discussion about Battlefield 2 tactics, maps and missions. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Age: 34
Posts: 170
|
Re: Damage Chart
Not to be a downer or anything, but could that be considered a copyright violation, copying the guide and posting it here?
__________________
|TG|MileHighAko |TG-7th|Ako Commander's Log: http://www.tacticalblog.com/MileHighAko |
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 93
|
Re: Damage Chart
Wow, those numbers are absolutely bizarre.
Why the difference between the shotguns? I am assuming that the deviation is a divisor (inverse relationship) so smaller number mean more recoil. The game says that the AK-101 also fires a 5.56...why does it have more damage than the M16? If anything, it should have less (16" barrel for AK, 20" barrel for M16). Why doesn't the G3 have roughly the same damage as the M24? Both shoot 7.62x51. Why doesn't the SVD have *more* damage than the M24? The SVD shoots 7.62x54 (soviet version of 7.62x61 aka the .30'06 used in the M1 Garand). The 92FS (pistol) has more damage than the MP5? Both are 9mm but the MP5 has a longer barrel! The DAO-12, MK3A1, and G36C appear to be useless. Don't spend your unlocks on those! There seems to be a transcribing error in the standing/crouching/prone numbers. They seem to be reversed (standing numbers are for prone) if the "higher numbers = less deviation" rule applies (see sniper rifles for validation). How many hitpoints does each class have? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1
|
Re: Damage Chart
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kingman AZ.
Age: 20
Posts: 1,442
|
Re: Damage Chart
Quote:
And thanks Telorn, that helps alot too, now i know if i kill a enemy ill know for sure if his kit(If same type kit) is really better or not.
__________________
![]() Start counting, when you reach infinity tell me. If you can read this you've got to much time on your hands. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
Age: 27
Posts: 409
|
Re: Damage Chart
Quote:
The MK3A1 is a fully-automatic shotgun. Again, just a different choice. The G36C has the best recoil characteristics, and basically ties for best shot deviation. You want low numbers for deviation (how far away from the center of your crosshairs the bullet actually hits) and recoil. The modifier for standing/crouching/prone is a multiplier to your deviation, so lower is better. Same thing for the zooming mod: you get more accurate when zoomed in; your deviation is lower. It is odd that the minimum deviation for the sniper rifles is so high...that seems wrong. It is also strange that you can apparently be in any body position and have the same sniper accuracy. Also, the chart says the ROF of the G36C is 600, but BFHQ says 750...
__________________
"Hardly used" will not fetch a better price for your brain. Last edited by verbose; 07-02-2005 at 01:57 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 648
|
Re: Damage Chart
Good chart. Thanks for posting. It illustrates some of my personal rules for accurate fire: use semi-automatic fire, crouch or go prone when you can, and always bring your weapon to your shoulder.
Damage seems awfully low on the M95 compared to the M24 by the way.
__________________
|TG-1stMIP|Manner 1st Mechanized Infantry Platoon (C-Team) Please donate your spare CPU cycles to help fight diseases like cancer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 44
|
Re: Damage Chart
Thanks for posting Telorn. That's really helpful for us choosing kits or choosing which gun to unlock. I agree, there are some oddities in the data but I'm sure they can be explained. I agree with what Keith Mann said above, shooting in bursts or single fire and crouch/prone + ironsights/scope is the only way to shoot to kill.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 93
|
Re: Damage Chart
Quote:
I can understand the zoomed deviation of the sniper rifle if it is net of the zoom power (i.e., 10x normal deviation because of the 10x --or whatever Nx-- zoom). Maybe there were some problems in transcription. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: a sunny beach in florida
Age: 21
Posts: 528
|
Re: Damage Chart
Quote:
...game balance...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Georgia
Age: 27
Posts: 2,187
|
Re: Damage Chart
Quote:
__________________
Telorn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 64
|
Re: Damage Chart
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A general overview of the new skills... | Tarenth | World of Warcraft - General Discussion | 3 | 08-30-2006 03:12 PM |
| Your Hunter and You - Fundamentals | Tarenth | World of Warcraft - Tactics & Strategy Discussion | 3 | 08-05-2006 08:05 PM |
| Warlock's abilities, talents, and skills | Cerevox | World of Warcraft - Tactics & Strategy Discussion | 6 | 05-10-2006 05:24 PM |
| 1.9 notes lots of good stuff | Helle | World of Warcraft - General Discussion | 5 | 11-26-2005 09:59 AM |

