Ribbon Nomination Example

[whistler]

The following is the minimum required standard for a PCS ribbon nomination. It is for the Distinguished Defence ribbon, but can be applied to all other ribbons.

I have substituted the name to protect the innocent.

Originally Posted by Ribbon Nomination Standard

I am writing this letter in order to nominate Bob for a Distinguished Defence ribbon.

Over past months, I have personally witnessed Bob use teamwork in order to secure the objective, whether it be hostage defending or watching the bomb sites. Not only will he make his intentions clear to the team, he will not leave his post unless asked to do so. His objective-first attitude has been a big contribution to the rest of his team, and it has been this way for some time.

A few clear, recent examples come to mind:

A few days ago on Kismayo, Bob was on the terrorist team. He listened to the overall team plan and it was decided that he would be guarding the front set of hostages. Not only did he stick to them but was able to hold the CT's off on several occasions. He doesn't risk his neck or make erroneous judgement calls.

The same day he was a terrorist on Italy. I wasn't on his team, but from what I could ascertain was that Bob, along with a buddy, were couped up in the hostage house, an always-effective manuever when combined with reconnaisance from middle, long hall and apartments. Although it is a seldom-chosen position to simply camp the hostage house, Bob's demonstration of objective-prioritizing and teamwork have been as clear and consistent since the day I first played with him.

This is acceptable because it gives two things: a background of the nominated player and clear, specific examples. It doesn't have to be this wordy but it does need these two things. Remember that nominating a player in this fashion will be seriously examined by the PCS admin team.

If you see a player exhibiting habitual overall good performance please feel free to send your nominations to Ribbons.