-
IHS Mission Feedback
Ok. I posted this to ask for some honest feedback about the IHS mission that several of the squads ran a few days ago. I am going to tweak that one and possibly make several more. What I really need is this
-Sustains
-Improves
-Wish List
Please only people that where there for the mission post here. Thank you
~Dredge|TGU Instructor|303rd TGSAD|ArmA Admin||TG Pathfinder|
DO YOU HAVE WHAT IT TAKES?
Armis Exposcere Pacem
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- East Coast
- Age
- 31
- Posts
- 221
Re: IHS Mission Feedback
More 353rd guys next time :P
Overall it was a good mission, but the 3 of us had no chance securing our target. We managed to clear the target, however at that point it was 2 of us and we were not armed for cqb when the OpFor came out of the woodwork in force.
Not much more I can say as I was a bird after that. Would like to run it again though.
|TG-353rd| Marvin
|353rd Special Operations Group| First Sergeant
-
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- BC, Canada
- Age
- 30
- Posts
- 303
Re: IHS Mission Feedback
nightvision is pretty bad on the map, even with mods. Overcast should help.
SF mission was very good and difficult. Can't wait to play through the map completely.
Wish there was more consitency on silenced weapons for SF.
-
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 82
Re: IHS Mission Feedback
Agree with all the points of my fellow 353rd as it relates to the objective we were tasked with. Everyone in the SF team should have a silenced primary rifle except the DMR and the Heavy Gunner. Also the nightvision was the worst I have seen it in ArmA, I'm sure smarter people than me know why that is the case.
One suggestion is to have the individual objectives inter-linked somehow. Not have to be done in order as that would be boring, but something. I don't know jack about mission-making but is it possible to adjust the AI's response somehow. For instance if multiple objectives are hit at the same time they lose Command and Control and are slower to react to threats? That would be cool. Or of course if the attacks are staggered you could pull resources away from a target, then hit the second objective and have the AI running all around the map reacting to suprise attacks.
In all it was a very enjoyable mission from the part I played. I also think the challenge level at the Regroup Point is appropriate if the squad is full strength. I look forward to playing the other objectives too. It is really like 4 mini-missions!The Don Abides...
-
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- I jump between Maine and Trier, Germany
- Age
- 24
- Posts
- 1,757
Re: IHS Mission Feedback
It was a very fun mission and would be really good with a full stack of people. Only thing is that the night vision killed us when in Alpha.
|TG-1st| Viper - Commanding Officer
Former ArmA Admin | TG Pathfinder
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness, that most frightens us. Your playing small does not serve the world. There is nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around you. We are all meant to shine as children do. It's not just in some of us; it is in everyone. And as we let our own lights shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others
-
Re: IHS Mission Feedback
Can that be fixed via scripting or no? if it can i will do it. I am also "adjusting" the DZ due to the fact people cant miss the little puddle of water near it *cough!-browna-*cough*
|TGU Instructor|303rd TGSAD|ArmA Admin||TG Pathfinder|
DO YOU HAVE WHAT IT TAKES?
Armis Exposcere Pacem
Reply With Quote
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Bookmarks