Welcome to Tactical Gamer

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
Discussion: Armed Assault / ArmA - SOP's, Technical Support & FAQ - problem performance - hello friends. I would like 2 helps. 1° - my configuration is a pentium D
  1. #1


    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Salvador-Brazil
    Posts
    20

    problem performance

    hello friends. I would like 2 helps. 1° - my configuration is a pentium D 3.0GHZ 2gb memory geforce xfx 6800 xt 250 hd 400 seventeam. I have to put everything in the low and even so I have fps of 20 fps. why???
    my computer have configuration recommended but my performance is low 25 fps all low and very low and in city my fps down 17. help-me

    2° quest - which better sound mod???

    my ingles is not good but I hope that you understand

  2.  
  3. #2

    loyalguard's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,316

    Re: problem performance

    Campos-

    There are still some performance probs with ArmA...I am trying to put together a list of common problems and resolutons based on discussions I have seen at the BIS / ArmA forums. In the meantime:

    -Some people report better performance with HIGHER settings then lower.

    -Try to add the following to your ArmA shortcut: -maxmem=256.

    -Every 10 minutes or so, while in ArmA press [LeftShift]+[NumPad-], release them and quicly type "flush" (not "/" first it is not in the chat box)

    -In your NVidia control panel, make sure your AA & AF are set to application controlled
    |TG| LoyalGuard

  4.  
  5. #3

    tHa_KhAn's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    The Gunshine State
    Posts
    3,139

    Re: problem performance

    Well, the Geforce 6800 is problem the source of your low frames. Most people would be happy to have 20-25 FPS. That is what I get when I am in the cities. I have an AMD 4200 x2 2GB ram and a ATI 1900XT with 512 and I get around 35-40 in the open and 20 or less in the cities. Try turning your settings to all high. I get the same or better frames on high as I do low. You actually get the same frames as most people no matter what their setup. So you are not actually having much of a problem when compared to most others.
    |TG-12th| tHa_KhAn

    XBL GT: Khan58


  6.  

     
  7. #4

    WhiskeySix's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    13,483
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: problem performance

    It seems the video card (and thus video settings) isn't the bottleneck... I changed my resolution from 1024x768 -> 1400x1050 and I actually GAINED a few fps.. huh?

    |TG-12th|WhiskeySix

  8.  
  9. #5

    loyalguard's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,316

    Re: problem performance

    Here are some additional things from the BIS/ArmA forums:


    -All settings on High, while Anti Aliasing on low or normal
    -maxmem=512 or 256, very dependent on if you have CTD's
    -160.x videocard drivers, NO profile settings, simply vanilla
    -latest chipset drivers
    Last edited by loyalguard; 06-29-2007 at 11:26 AM. Reason: typos
    |TG| LoyalGuard

  10.  
  11. #6


    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Salvador-Brazil
    Posts
    20

    Re: problem performance

    my memory is 2gb dual channel. do you have to put maxmem=512???? does everything leave in the low?

    I didn't understand what loyalguard said: "Every 10 minutes or so, while in ArmA press [LeftShift]+[NumPad-], release them and quicly type "flush" (not "/" first it is not in the chat box)"

  12.  

     
  13. #7

    loyalguard's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,316

    Re: problem performance

    Quote Originally Posted by RCAMPOS View Post
    my memory is 2gb dual channel. do you have to put maxmem=512???? does everything leave in the low?

    I didn't understand what loyalguard said: "Every 10 minutes or so, while in ArmA press [LeftShift]+[NumPad-], release them and quicly type "flush" (not "/" first it is not in the chat box)"
    I am sorry I didn't write it more clearly.

    The maxmem is for video memory, ony your video card, not your normal system memory (RAM). So, since your video card has 256MB of video memory, I recommend that setting.

    The "flush" command is more confusing. I will try to simplify it.

    As of v. 1.08 of ArmA, there are some problems with video memory and the game. If your FPS goes down, or the screen flickers, or other problems, it may help to "flush" your video memory (clear it and start again). To do this in the game, do the following:


    Press the keys in the red circles as instructed below:


    1. Press and hold the Left Shift Key
    2. Press the Number Pad Minus Key
    (Then release both)
    3. type: flush (not as chat, just type it)

    If it works, the screen will go black for a few seconds and in the lower left corner of your screen you should see "Recieving...". Then, your screen will come back hopefully with higher FPS and no flickering (especially night vision and in map view).

    I hope that helps!
    Last edited by loyalguard; 06-29-2007 at 01:01 PM. Reason: typos
    |TG| LoyalGuard

  14.  
  15. #8


    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Salvador-Brazil
    Posts
    20

    Re: problem performance

    ok understandy. sorry my ingles. ehehehe . my memory card is 256mb, THEN i have to put maxmem=512 , right???

    thy very much

    which a good mod of sound for putting in the armed assault?

  16.  
  17. #9

    Gogeta's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
    Age
    35
    Posts
    3,725

    Re: problem performance

    Quote Originally Posted by loyalguard View Post
    The "flush" command is more confusing. I will try to simplify it.

    As of v. 1.08 of ArmA, there are some problems with video memory and the game. If your FPS goes down, or the screen flickers, or other problems, it may help to "flush" your video memory (clear it and start again). To do this in the game, do the following:



    I hope that helps!
    Wow.. thanks man!!! it sure did
    |TG-4th| Gogeta



  18.  

     
  19. #10

    OrdoSanguis's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Misery
    Age
    19
    Posts
    150

    Re: problem performance

    Yeah, now my night vision doesn't flicker anymore. Thanks!

  20.  
  21. #11

    ANGELofDEATH's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Paradise!
    Posts
    1,136

    Re: problem performance

    Quote Originally Posted by WhiskeySix View Post
    It seems the video card (and thus video settings) isn't the bottleneck... I changed my resolution from 1024x768 -> 1400x1050 and I actually GAINED a few fps.. huh?
    OMG that is crazy talk

    Wait it's true... I put mine up to the 1440x900 and gained at least 5-8 FPS.
    and the game looks a bit better, even on lowest of settings.
    [TG-19th]theeANGELofDEATH(Steam/Origin)
    E Pluribus Unum
    Sarcasm is just another free service I offer
    BattleField 3 - Vehicles Destroyed: 931 Assists: 252

  22.  
  23. #12

    tHa_KhAn's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    The Gunshine State
    Posts
    3,139

    Re: problem performance

    Quote Originally Posted by ANGELofDEATH View Post
    OMG that is crazy talk

    Wait it's true... I put mine up to the 1440x900 and gained at least 5-8 FPS.
    and the game looks a bit better, even on lowest of settings.
    Put all your settings but AA, Post processing, and shadows on high. You probably won't lose any frames.
    |TG-12th| tHa_KhAn

    XBL GT: Khan58


  24.  

     
  25. #13

    Barnaby's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Stourport - Worcestershire -UK
    Age
    67
    Posts
    599

    Re: problem performance

    Yes that's a big rgr KhAn that's how I have mine set although I stumbled to the settings.
    Strange how my FPS definately improved when I increased some of the settings, lowest setting do not give highest fps but it is beyond me to explain why.

    One tip I would give in trying to max your fps is how you respond when running and you hit the prone button.
    If your maxed out correctly you should go prone quickly in real time but if your settings are too high you find you will stagger on for a couple of steps before going prone.
    This is very worrying when you run for a bush intending to go prone behind it but then find yourself in front of it.

    Printing out the "quick flush" thingymebob as a quick ref Loyal I'll try that tonight.

    Lots of hints & tips here RCAMPOS >>>

    http://www.flashpoint1985.com/cgi-bi...T;f=68;t=56898
    Last edited by Barnaby; 06-30-2007 at 09:27 AM.

  26.  
  27. #14

    Dick Blonov's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    |xargs -r rm
    Age
    54
    Posts
    4,642
    Blog Entries
    6

    Re: problem performance

    Quote Originally Posted by tHa_KhAn View Post
    I have an AMD 4200 x2 2GB ram and a ATI 1900XT with 512 and I get around 35-40 in the open and 20 or less in the cities. Try turning your settings to all high. I get the same or better frames on high as I do low. You actually get the same frames as most people no matter what their setup. So you are not actually having much of a problem when compared to most others.
    I'm curious. Do you have adaptive antialiasing enabled in the CCC ?

    This setting seems to have a fairly high performance hit. With AA set to low in ArmA, adaptive antialiasing made the game unplayable. A good test to see if it makes a difference for you is the SP convoy mission. With AA set to low, having adaptive AA enabled resulted in a slide show (5-7 FPS). Disabled, 17-20 FPS.

    DB
    |TG-6th|Blonov

    «That looks like a really nice house except for that horrible bathroom.» Donrhos

    PR:How to get started | Teamspeak | Banned ? Kicked ? | The 6th Devils Brigade







  28.  
  29. #15
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Age
    31
    Posts
    238

    Re: problem performance

    I started messing with my Post Processing and have found that by turning it on I gain a substantial amount of frames. But the handoff is visual sharpness. Objects at distance are blurred somewhat and it'll take some getting used to.

    But at 1440x900 and everything on High, it's almost "too sharp" if that makes sense. I think maybe the Post Processing blur helps to smooth things out, in addition to really kicking up my frame rate.

    GeForce 7900GT (256mb)

  30.  

     

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


  
 

Back to top