View Poll Results: What should be done about Domination
- Voters
- 67. You may not vote on this poll
-
05-14-2009, 12:21 PM #31
Re: #Server 1 Domination -Why?
I agree. While most of you want a total non-dom server, I am apprehensive to do this as it causes division and pushes people away. TG CAN be all things to all people, that is why we have 2 servers. There is no Domination on Server 2.....Server 1 will get a clean out, so that there are a lot less versions of Domination on it but still some so that the guys who play it are happy. I can't please everyone, so here I go pissing everyone off......Schmalfelden has been discussed a lot by the admin team in the past, both before and after the TG MOD file was created, but now feels like the right time, with ArmA 2 around the corner and people getting a little antsey for new content. And as suggested by Mosely, it means any randoms who have been causing issues recently will probably not even bother. So go, enjoy......











Contact an Admin | Nominate your teammates for a ribbon | TG Primer | Kicked? Banned? READ THIS FIRST! | Server Rules and SOP's
Saddam ✓ Osama ✓ Gaddafi ✓ Justin Bieber ☐ Rebecca Black ☐
-
05-14-2009, 02:53 PM #32
Re: #Server 1 Domination -Why?
It's your guys' server so due what you feel is best but the majority so far has voted for it to go and by it being on, more of the regulars tend to stay away when they see it due to their experiences with it. Having squads here and there working as a squad or helping another squad isn't really the level of teamwork I personally liked about TG, it's the platoon + level team work that i've liked about TG. I've played on other servers on domination or evolution that required "team work." Basically meaning everyone must go for the same objective and try to stick together. This is by no means real coordination and feels more like an untrained militia sim than a military sim. Like I mentioned before, there are plenty of domination servers out there, why does TG need to try and provide for the same crowd? Someone wants to play domination, hop on any one of the 30 servers offering it with your buddies and there you go.
|TG-Irr|LCpl. Soto
TGULT-Roel Yento
-
05-14-2009, 03:06 PM #33
Re: #Server 1 Domination -Why?
Yes.. I agree!
DOWN WITH DOMINATION!
Its making us mindless arcade game players. Dumber.
Maybe it should be called DUMBination.
-
05-14-2009, 03:30 PM #34
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 13
Re: #Server 1 Domination -Why?
Wow, a lot of Domination hate going on here. I can see where a lot of you are coming from, but for me, I really like Domination. I really like it, mainly because I still suck at ArmA. Its more of a learning experience. I mean, I've played ArmA for a while, but I still suck at it. Yeah I can move in a fire team, follow orders, and put rounds downrange with out killing teammates, but I am no where near as good as other players on the server.
The central issue is, is that I can't improve my skills outside of Domination. For instance, my preferred role is a transport pilot. That being said, in the normal missions we play, a transport pilot screws up once, crashes into a mountain, and well, the mission is over. So I never play transport helos, because I don't want to ruin missions for people. This means I never improve my piloting, never get more confident, ect, causing me to miss out on a large part of why I originally loved to play the game.
Domination is a place where people can learn to play TG, where people (like me), can be educated on proper fire team tactics, proper weapon deployment and usage. That's where I learned how to play ArmA, and play TG specifically. I couldn't have learned in missions, I die far too quickly.
I think there's a place for Domination at TG. You get out of it what you put in. I've had some incredibly fun times recently. In my last 4 times on the server, every one I've been with a solid TG squad lead that directed missions, coordinated the squad, and really had us moving quickly and professionally. I really enjoyed it, especially because when an insertion went bad, or I took that inevitable stray bullet, I didn't have to wait 45 min to get back into the action. I could learn from mistakes, and improve my skills in a much less strenuous environment.
Anyway, just my two cents. That Domination ArmA server was what got me interested in TG in the first place, and actually what got me to register on the boards. Some really good team oriented missions when it was just starting out really opened my eyes to the community and the fun of tactics and simulations.
-
05-14-2009, 05:53 PM #35
Re: #Server 1 Domination -Why?
when ArmA II comes out i think that only one server of ArmA will remain.Jus 1 more month ^^
And to be honest, before going on Coop and TvT i started on Domination to get some Notion and to learn how to play with some weapons likte the Javelin.
I could have done on an SP missoin, but i got a lot of help from others players.With help has been more easy then trying by error and hit.
-
05-15-2009, 12:20 AM #36
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Posts
- 127
Re: #Server 1 Domination -Why?
Domination is useful for kickstarting the server population. Unlike some missions people insist on playing that absolutely empty the server.
-
05-16-2009, 05:28 PM #37
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 7
Re: #Server 1 Domination -Why?
A friend and I were just playing missions in Tactical Gamer Server #1, hoping to populate it. We were suddenly kicked from the server and it switched to playing a Domination game type that is dependent on downloadable content that we don't have, so we can't get back in.
What the heck?
-
05-16-2009, 05:39 PM #38
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Ontario, Canada
- Posts
- 737
Re: #Server 1 Domination -Why?
New islands on Server 1, Schmalfelden (read the post on it for DL link).
If Domination is going to be on the server, PLEASE put the ACE version on. It REALLY sucks when you can't help an unconscious dude other than making him wake up by getting him hit with backblast or a concussion from explosives.
With the fresh terrain and awesome woods, it is fun again because the terrain hasn't been played to death and there aren't any massive hills to snipe at the AI from.
-
05-17-2009, 02:26 AM #39
Re: #Server 1 Domination -Why?
Do you not think we would have put an ACE version of Schmalfelden on if we had it!

Unless you know where one may be downloaded, w have to wait until Xeno gets back to us.
We have put in a request to him to ACE this ASAP.
BD1BlackDog1





"What we do in life... echoes in eternity!"
-
05-17-2009, 05:37 AM #40
Re: #Server 1 Domination -Why?
Wouldn't it be simpler to port existing ACE Domination to Schmafelden?
About Domination, Im not a big fan of it either. Played it some nights on the TG 1 server and people were pretty much running around solo.
But if a large percentage of the TG people really wants this, then go ahead, I'm happy in server 2 where unique stuff happens

Playername Sparks444 in BF2
-
05-17-2009, 06:45 AM #41
Re: #Server 1 Domination -Why?
i am also in the class of not liking domination much,for the afore mentioned reasons (lack of teamplay and the like)
although if the great and glorious mission makers could make more missions maybe domination would be made redundant ...just a thought.....
and also maybe try utillising more islands i noticed there are a few on both servers not being used much .
-
05-17-2009, 03:01 PM #42
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 7
Re: #Server 1 Domination -Why?
It seems that my point was completely overlooked.
IF TG is going to have a Domination server, it SHOULD be Server #2. Server #1 has no third person and is thus ideal for the more immersive, realistic TG teamplay, and allows for proper TvT.
-
05-18-2009, 04:53 AM #43
-
05-18-2009, 11:56 AM #44
Re: #Server 1 Domination -Why?
I'm personally not a big fan of Domination, but I do enjoy the larger missions that have easy join in progress such as Evolution, Warfare, etc. Since we do not have the others available, I see Domination as the only option for players who only have time for a quick ArmA game and want it with some action. As with any server or any mission, without proper leadership the quality of gameplay can degrade.
As mentioned earlier, this argument was once made against Evolution, then against Saharni Life, then Warfare, etc. The real problem is the popularity of the missions causes them to get played regularly when people who are not fond of them want to play other missions. Since leadership roles are more clearly defined in standard coop missions because of the beginning and end nature of the missions, many feel it is easier to be authoritative when the lack of team work greatly affects the one attempt at completing the mission. The same rules apply for any mission when it comes to leadership and teamwork.|TG-12th| tHa_KhAn

XBL GT: Khan58






-
05-18-2009, 05:00 PM #45
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 7
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)







Reply With Quote


Bookmarks