Magnum50

Just wondering what you Tactical Gamer members plan to use, continue with teamspeak or are you guys using the in games comms?

thx for your time.

__________________
Magnum
www.gettacticaldammit.com

Black_V!per

Thats a good question, what will we be using?

__________________

Tempus

We currently use, and will likely continue to use, in-game comms. The chain of command has its uses, and we need to maintain compatibility with new people who join the server and are not on TS.

__________________
Battlefield 2/2142 Game Officer
Contact me with server/player/admin issues.




-- Suits are what you wear when doing things you shouldn’t want to do anyway.

FROM THE TACTICAL GAMER PRIMER.
3) Support game play in a near-simulation environment. Where the focus of play would not be solely on doing what it takes to win, but doing so utilizing real-world combat strategy and tactics rather than leveraging exploits provided to players by the design of the game engine.

asch

Many of us, especially the admins, will be in teamspeak to provide support. You are more than welcome to also join teamspeak, but please make sure to keep game chatter off of the teamspeak channel. Make sure you have your TS binds setup.

__________________
| My Maps

Gaming Videos by Tactical Gamers

Fear the Frog! | Kill the Frog! | An Inconvenient Truth

"Support game play in a near-simulation environment. Where the focus of play would not be solely on doing what it takes to win, but doing so utilizing real-world combat strategy and tactics rather than leveraging exploits provided to players by the design of the game engine, regardless of the level of advantage, if any, it gives over the opposing team." -- Tactical Gamer Primer

><JohnGalt><

I think it is important to promote the in game comm. Squad based play is what bf2 is built around. Ts w/ the squad based comm gets confusing.

__________________