![]() |


|
|||||||
| Battlefield 2 - Ranked Vanilla General discussion for Battlefield 2 Ranked. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#31 (permalink) | ||
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,494
|
Re: Can we institute this rule?
Quote:
And I think 1 AT round can take down a jet..Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 33
Posts: 4,337
|
Re: Can we institute this rule?
Quote:
Getting back on topic, I agree something definitely needs to be done about leveling the ridiculous firepower of the BHs/SHs.
__________________
-F- Beatnik
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Illinois
Age: 31
Posts: 28
|
Re: Can we institute this rule?
Quote:
__________________
Let them eat war. XFire: billygnosis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 91
|
Re: Can we institute this rule?
In real life, all it took was an RPG to explode in the proximity of the tail rotor to bring a blackhawk down. So I agree with Tarpan and the others, the bh/sh should be nerfed some in the damage it can take and capturing the flags with them without boots on the ground should be a no no.
Also you have my vote in removing Kubra Dam from the map rotation, I hate that map. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,472
|
Re: Can we institute this rule?
Remember, it's not a "the seahawk is too powerful" thread guys. It's a "people shouldn't be allowed to use the seahawk to capture flags, especially defended ones" thread.
__________________
![]() [squadl] "I am the prettiest african-american, vietnamese..cong..person." -SugarNCamo |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 91
|
Re: Can we institute this rule?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | |
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Norwich, UK
Age: 29
Posts: 4,236
|
Re: Can we institute this rule?
I do think they go hand in hand. If it were less armoured then it wouldn't be such a problem. It's a shame that the flag take rules can't do things like have a unit accelerate a flag take but without doing it by itself. So if you had a helo over a flag it does nothing, but a helo and 1 guy is better than 1 guy. Then it becomes a choice - hover for a quick take whilst your guys are on the ground, or go high to cover with the guns?
Either way if a flag is in a building, you should not be able to cap ot whilst outside the building. Quote:
But it doesn't work for flag capping because 1 eryx and ur dead.
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 108
|
Re: Can we institute this rule?
IMHO, the game is still too new. The anti-seaHawk tactics require more timming/awareness than Instant Vertical Capture wich is quite easy. I fear to many new rules might change the game(not specificaly this one, but the other ones that are popping up everyday it seems
I would wait see what patch 1.3 does, and until then would stick with the "must join squad" rule.
Last edited by TG_Snap; 07-29-2005 at 08:15 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) | |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Rancho Valle de San José, Alta California
Posts: 203
|
Re: Can we institute this rule?
Quote:
__________________
TMG FUNKED1 "It makes no difference what men think of war, said the judge. War endures. As well ask men what they think of stone. War was always here. Before man was, war waited for him. The ultimate trade awaiting its ultimate practitioner. That is the way it was and will be. That way and not some other way." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 183
|
Re: Can we institute this rule?
While we're on the topic of banning things we dont like -
can we ban bombers from using their bombs and taking out 10 guys at a time, then reloading and doing it again 20 seconds later? wah wah /sarcasm === Only the really *good* BH squads with good pilots achieve the greatness this thread discusses. Just like a team with a really *good* bomber pilot, will absolutely cripple the opposition (I was on the receiving end of a mishkan domination on KubraDam about a week ago). Should we ban good bombers also? It's a part of the game.... The average crappy BH squad gets owned. Yeah, maybe you cant take it down right away, but you sure as hell can kill a bunch of passengers and scare them away damn easily. If they cap it, get out (you were staying out of the gunner's view right?) and just recap it. If you have a team defending a flag, it's a non-issue. It's already known that the BH will be nerfed in the next patch. Hopefully this will address the only real issues like being able to cap the flag from 1000 feet in the sky, or through the roof of a building.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 4,716
|
Re: Can we institute this rule?
I think the only real problem with this is on Mastuur City. It has to be the stupidest design for anti-air. The flag that spawns the BH/SH, has the anti-air emplacement. There are no other air units to handle it. It can take a beating and bug out to come back for another beating while taking out a bunch of units. They rack up the kills and bring down the enemy tickets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 43
|
Re: Can we institute this rule?
i'm assuming if this rule gets implemented, it applies to the MEC helos as well? while i do agree the SH minigun is a bit off in terms of lethality, the use of helos this way is valid so long as both sides have the ability/assets. i don't know, i'm all for fair teamplay but it might get to a point where the only thing we're allowed to do is walk to the cp
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,472
|
Re: Can we institute this rule?
Quote:
I'm not a good seahawk pilot, I'm average. I can manage to get my guys from point A to point B without slamming into a tree about 80% of the time. I have managed to neutralize an enemy flag when I inadvertantly passed over it to land on the other side of the compound that houses it. If I can do it by mistake, most anyone can do it on purpose. Your bomber comparisson isn't truly valid because being a good bomber and killing lots of people doesn't exploit what I believe is a critical flaw in the game; that flaw being the neutralization/capture of a flag from the air when there are defenders in the flag radius. It's not even specific to the Seahawk anymore. Yesterday on Dailan Plant, a Chinese transport helo landed on the roof of the south warehouse. Despite the fact that I and 3 other squadmates were inside the flag radius, the flag neutralized and was almost captured until a lucky AT round killed the chopper. As far as it being part of the game: Consider the fact that it is also part of the game that I can take a squad into an enemy UCB and spawncamp the living hell out of them. Yet, rules have been made to protect against that. If you believe I'm complaining because I don't like the Seahawk, or just for the sake of complaining, you're wrong. I'm bringing up what I see as a game exploit that I believe needs to be dealt with somehow.
__________________
![]() [squadl] "I am the prettiest african-american, vietnamese..cong..person." -SugarNCamo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) | ||
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 183
|
Re: Can we institute this rule?
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,472
|
Re: Can we institute this rule?
I didn't quote it for a specific reason.
This: Quote:
All I'm saying is that yes, wait and see. But don't rest your hopes on EA to deal with this- they still haven't fixed the IFF bug for crying out loud.
__________________
![]() [squadl] "I am the prettiest african-american, vietnamese..cong..person." -SugarNCamo |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| TG Should have this rule | lunisicx | Battlefield 2 - Ranked Vanilla | 18 | 08-08-2005 06:48 PM |

