PR Dev Journal. - Page 27

[R-PUB]bosco · 07-23-2008, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [R-DEV]Chuc

Shorter draw times, shorter sight in time than larger weapons, at the cost of effective range and controlability (depending on the calibers involved)

http://www.wegame.com/watch/Project_...fence_Weapons/

Forgive the fps drop at some parts.

...

oldirti · 07-23-2008, 10:21 AM

Is that COD4 ^_^

**Charity Case** · 07-23-2008, 10:36 AM

Diggin' the new animations and 3d ironsights, looks like the QBB is a real b**** to shoot though.

oldirti · 07-23-2008, 10:45 AM

If scoped weapons accuracy and recoil is the same...it looks like the Ironsite vs scopes balance is going to be worse than ever.

google · 07-23-2008, 10:52 AM

Hopefully, this will make firefights more enduring as opposed to the quick, headshots when engaging hostiles at 200 meters plus. To the contraire dirti, I think this will force people to be more generous with their ammo and use surpression as a tactic much more often.

**Katanama** · 07-23-2008, 11:00 AM

Well the recoil should be the same on both, and the only assaultrifle ingame that have any recoil to talk about is the G3. and here it is not hard to line up the sights, or atleast it shouldn't be so dont think that this will give the scope weapons more of an advantage than they should have.

google, in the real world there should be no problem hitting a head at 200m with or without a scope. so that part is not that unrealistic, ofcourse in combat its harder then on a range but it is still something most well trained troops can do.

And yes looking forward to people having to use proper firing techics.

oldirti · 07-23-2008, 11:01 AM

oh sorry,i mis-spoke...if scoped weapons have same recoil and accuracy as in .7 THEN the balance will be messed up.

ReaperMAC · 07-23-2008, 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldirti

oh sorry,i mis-spoke...if scoped weapons have same recoil and accuracy as in .7 THEN the balance will be messed up.

Accuracy in .7 is WAAAAYYY more realistic than in .756. .756 is just headshots after headshots.

[R-PUB]bosco · 07-23-2008, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reapermac

accuracy in .7 is waaaayyy more realistic than in .756. .756 is just headshots after headshots.

qfmft

**Terminal Boy** · 07-23-2008, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Katanama

Well the recoil should be the same on both, and the only assault rifle ingame that have any recoil to talk about is the G3.

Which is odd as the M14 and the SVD should recoil in a very similar manner as the M14 fires the exact same 7.62 NATO round and the round used by the SVD is actually slightly more powerful.

**Katanama** · 07-23-2008, 06:31 PM

Nope I said assault rifle they are not assault rifles they are designated marksmen rifles there is a difference.

oldirti · 07-23-2008, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReaperMAC

Accuracy in .7 is WAAAAYYY more realistic than in .756. .756 is just headshots after headshots.

DAMNIT! i mis-spoke again... i meant .75...

**Sabre_Tooth_Tigger** · 07-23-2008, 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terminal Boy

Which is odd as the M14 and the SVD should recoil in a very similar manner as the M14 fires the exact same 7.62 NATO round and the round used by the SVD is actually slightly more powerful.

G3 and M14 do the same damage in game because of that, not sure about the recoil but its pretty similar. You can try and use M14 up close if you like

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?k...elRt_Xl9WyW6VA

Code:

              Limb	Body	Head	Poor Armour	Good Armour
Skorpion       15.4	23.8	210	15.4	          14
SKS/AK         46.2	71.4	630	63	          42
G3/M14         55	85	750	75	          50
SAW/M16/AK101  39.6	61.2	540	46.8    	  36
SVD/PKM        61.6    95.2    840     84                56

**Waldo_II** · 07-23-2008, 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [R-DEV]Chuck

Shorter draw times, shorter sight in time than larger weapons, at the cost of effective range and controlability (depending on the calibers involved)

http://www.wegame.com/watch/Project_...fence_Weapons/

Forgive the fps drop at some parts.

*gasp*

I just had a small orgasm.

**Sabre_Tooth_Tigger** · 07-26-2008, 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hotrod525

Hey guyz i start a thread regrouping all the known incoming stuff in P.R.0.8
You can find all details in the Dev Journal. Ill keep it update and if a Mod can Stick it ( if people like it ) would be great :wink:

Maps

Weapons

Minimi-Para. ( U.S./Brits )
SA80 Bayonet ( Brits )
G3SG1 ( M.E.C.)
SSGP1 ( M.E.C.)
Underbarrel Grenade Luncher ( All )
M4 ( U.S. Army )
Aircraft Ordinance. ( U.S./Brits )
L86 ( Brits )

Vehicles

Chinook helicopter [0.9+] ( U.S./Brits )
Harrier GR9 ground attack jet ( U.S.M.C./Brits )
RAF Tornado GR4 fighter-bomber jet ( Brits )
Stryker APC ( U.S. Army )
Bradley IFV ( U.S. Army )
HMMWV ( U.S. )
Stormer HVM AAV ( Brits )

Assets & Statics

Deployable .50 ( All )
New way to deploy bunker/firebase ( All )
New Afghanistan static compound
Container Handling Crane

Gameplay & Animations

****ALL CREDIT GO TO THE AWESOME DEV TEAM WE GOT****

Updated stuff in red.

Community made :
EFFECTS

Quote:

Originally Posted by kristofer
Don't forget Alex's work:

Hydra rocket effects
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wgm4dWIm7Jw
Tank - shell firing effects
AA smoke effects
Tunguska firing effects

Dust effects
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKp3D_mEmC8

Laser-guided bomb impact effect
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tJrhyUBxUk

Most of these videos have been on YouTube for a while and, from the videos, seem almost finished.

CANADIAN FORCES(0.85-0.9?)

http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f10-...ase-0-8-a.html

07-23-2008, 10:21 AM	#392 (permalink)
oldirti Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 878	Re: PR Dev Journal. Is that COD4 ^_^ __________________

07-23-2008, 10:36 AM	#393 (permalink)
Charity Case Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: 'Zoo Town Age: 22 Posts: 313	Re: PR Dev Journal. Diggin' the new animations and 3d ironsights, looks like the QBB is a real b** to shoot though. __________________ \|TG-6th\|Charity Case**

07-23-2008, 10:45 AM	#394 (permalink)
oldirti Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 878	Re: PR Dev Journal. If scoped weapons accuracy and recoil is the same...it looks like the Ironsite vs scopes balance is going to be worse than ever. __________________

07-23-2008, 10:52 AM	#395 (permalink)
google Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: NJ Posts: 639	Re: PR Dev Journal. Hopefully, this will make firefights more enduring as opposed to the quick, headshots when engaging hostiles at 200 meters plus. To the contraire dirti, I think this will force people to be more generous with their ammo and use surpression as a tactic much more often. __________________ \|TG-Irr\| Google123456789 thanks Oldirti for this sig!

07-23-2008, 11:00 AM	#396 (permalink)
Katanama Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Denmark Age: 20 Posts: 205	Re: PR Dev Journal. Well the recoil should be the same on both, and the only assaultrifle ingame that have any recoil to talk about is the G3. and here it is not hard to line up the sights, or atleast it shouldn't be so dont think that this will give the scope weapons more of an advantage than they should have. google, in the real world there should be no problem hitting a head at 200m with or without a scope. so that part is not that unrealistic, ofcourse in combat its harder then on a range but it is still something most well trained troops can do. And yes looking forward to people having to use proper firing techics. __________________

07-23-2008, 11:01 AM	#397 (permalink)
oldirti Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 878	Re: PR Dev Journal. oh sorry,i mis-spoke...if scoped weapons have same recoil and accuracy as in .7 THEN the balance will be messed up. __________________

07-23-2008, 06:31 PM	#401 (permalink)
Katanama Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Denmark Age: 20 Posts: 205	Re: PR Dev Journal. Nope I said assault rifle they are not assault rifles they are designated marksmen rifles there is a difference. __________________

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links