PR Dev Journal. - Page 51

**Ghost Dog** · 10-03-2008, 03:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craz3y|Assasin

I think the Americans get a little of an overkill.

I agree... looks like another hell for insurgents unless they get RPG 's on every block.

Quote:

Originally Posted by llPANCHOll

I think the Cache system for insurgent maps ends up being like an Easter Egg hunt, and once people memorize where the caches are the fun just runs right out of it. I for one would like to see new life breathed into the the Insurgency Maps by adding an AAS mode, if a server chose to run them that way, they could.

Agreed again. I haven't played enough insurgency to know where the caches are, if I find one cache in an entire round I 'm happy. I 've spent hours as US searching blocks on these maps and tbh I have found 1 cache myself so far. Some people seem to know exactly where the caches are, I 've played rounds on Ramiel where every cache was destroyed within minutes after it was revealed...

I don't wanna sound too negative but this really isn't the type of map I 'm waiting for. I 'd rather see another combined forces map like Kashan or Qinling.

Seriously... 2 Apaches, 2 Abrams??? I 'm pretty sure this won't be the final setup.

sirsolo · 10-03-2008, 03:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghost Dog

I agree... looks like another hell for insurgents unless they get RPG 's on every block.

Agreed again. I haven't played enough insurgency to know where the caches are, if I find one cache in an entire round I 'm happy. I 've spent hours as US searching blocks on these maps and tbh I have found 1 cache myself so far. Some people seem to know exactly where the caches are, I 've played rounds on Ramiel where every cache was destroyed within minutes after it was revealed...

I don't wanna sound too negative but this really isn't the type of map I 'm waiting for. I 'd rather see another combined forces map like Kashan or Qinling.

Seriously... 2 Apaches, 2 Abrams??? I 'm pretty sure this won't be the final setup.

Ive take a bunch of randoms into Ramiel, a map I Havn't played before then, and destroyed 3 Caches.

Its all about going for the ones that arn't marked yet.

~Sirsolo

Belhade · 10-03-2008, 05:55 PM

Karbala, huh? They should get rid of the heavy armor and replace them with Chenworths.

What, haven't you seen Three Kings?

Walter: Ma'am, STEP AWAY FROM THE CHENWORTH!
[Adriana Drives Off]
Walter: Ma'am! OH PLEASE! OH PLEASE STOP!

**Waldo_II** · 10-03-2008, 05:59 PM

The Apache is a bad idea. It can just hover over the cache and fire its 30 down until it destroys the cache. If the ground forces have a good idea of where it is, then the Apache can fire a couple hellfire missiles down there.

People always lose the SA-7 quickly as insurgent. The Apaches should have no problem, with flares and only one responsible SA-7 insurgent out there.

**MarineSeaknight** · 10-03-2008, 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Waldo_II

The Apache is a bad idea. It can just hover over the cache and fire its 30 down until it destroys the cache. If the ground forces have a good idea of where it is, then the Apache can fire a couple hellfire missiles down there.

People always lose the SA-7 quickly as insurgent. The Apaches should have no problem, with flares and only one responsible SA-7 insurgent out there.

This was the response when they announced there could be attack aircraft on the map, Sangin. I remember a response being that the caches could be put underground, where airstrikes of any kind cannot damage.

Mobius007 · 10-04-2008, 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarineSeaknight

This was the response when they announced there could be attack aircraft on the map, Sangin. I remember a response being that the caches could be put underground, where airstrikes of any kind cannot damage.

That's a good idea... underground tunnel system leading to them possibly?

**llPANCHOll** · 10-04-2008, 01:01 AM

I doubt it, more like the underground area's currently on Al Basrah

**Waldo_II** · 10-04-2008, 01:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by llPANCHOll

I doubt it, more like the underground area's currently on Al Basrah

I would like very much to see these Al Basrah tunnels...

You probably mean Korengal. I don't think the Devs will want to model a whole new set of caves, so they probably will be using some of Korengal's.

Sonic · 10-04-2008, 01:37 AM

or possibly like the caves on korengal.

**llPANCHOll** · 10-04-2008, 02:30 AM

There are no caves on Al Basrah, or tunnels.. There are several rooms underground. I would not hold your breath for anything super cool like a system of tunnels or anything of that nature, on this new map.

[R-PUB]bosco · 10-05-2008, 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [R-DEV]Chuc

.85 Animation WIP Showreel

http://www.wegame.com/watch/0_85_Pro...S_IS_MY_RIFLE/

..

**browna3** · 10-05-2008, 10:58 AM

god damit bosco your teasing us again!

**Waldo_II** · 10-05-2008, 12:53 PM

Oh yes oh yes oh yes!!

Check out the aimpoint at 0:10/0:12/0:28!

And the new AK and SKS with wider rear sights is in...

IronTaxi · 10-05-2008, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by llPANCHOll

There are no caves on Al Basrah, or tunnels.. There are several rooms underground. I would not hold your breath for anything super cool like a system of tunnels or anything of that nature, on this new map.

Yeah not on this map anyway..

**kevlarorc** · 10-05-2008, 02:53 PM

Hellz yes! the aimpoint is clear now! wootiwootness...