PR Dev Journal. - Page 97

**warpig1292** · 04-18-2009, 10:23 PM

Also it would lose the realism.

For example a brittish crewman crewing with an American crewman. They must have different terms ect. Also will a US crewman know how to drive/gun in a challenger and vise versa. It just wont really work out..

I dont think it is possible to have 2 commanders also what would the point be. IF you did get 2 they would probably at some point coordinate against eachother

**Axis_Sniper** · 04-18-2009, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warpig1292

Also it would lose the realism.

For example a brittish crewman crewing with an American crewman. They must have different terms ect. Also will a US crewman know how to drive/gun in a challenger and vise versa. It just wont really work out..

I dont think it is possible to have 2 commanders also what would the point be. IF you did get 2 they would probably at some point coordinate against eachother

This game stopped being realistic when you could be revived with an adrenaline shot after a HEAT round hits your ass.

Anyway, it could be where the Americans would get their own vehicles as well as the British.

**warpig1292** · 04-18-2009, 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Axis_Sniper

This game stopped being realistic when you could be revived with an adrenaline shot after a HEAT round hits your ass.

Anyway, it could be where the Americans would get their own vehicles as well as the British.

I dont think that it would be possible to not let a US soldier into brit armor. I dont think that it is codeable in the engine

**thegreatnardini** · 04-18-2009, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warpig1292

I dont think that it would be possible to not let a US soldier into brit armor. I dont think that it is codeable in the engine

The Bradleys were used by the British as a placeholder in 0.7 Quinling. The map loading screen said something about "US AA support."

**A.WICKENS** · 04-18-2009, 11:33 PM

Im just waiting for the complaints of 'Faction Switching' on the same team to start!

**creepin** · 04-19-2009, 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Axis_Sniper

I think they should try to include more factions.

I think they should also do like a joint-op map. Where US and British Forces vs. China, or Chinese and MEC forces vs. US. Or something like that. Sounds a little far fetched, I know. But one can only dream.

thats a SP-DEV wink

**MarineSeaknight** · 04-19-2009, 02:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warpig1292

I dont think that it would be possible to not let a US soldier into brit armor. I dont think that it is codeable in the engine

Sure you can. Just teamlock the tank to the team you want.

You could have Iraqi Insurgents driving around in an M1 Abrams if you coded it the right way.

**Axis_Sniper** · 04-19-2009, 03:14 AM

I can imagine the Devs adding a sound file for people getting into armor that isn't part of their faction

"How the hell do you drive this?!?!"
"Jesus how the hell am I driving this thing!?!"
"afjsbfoseifbaofb" (This would be a mix between gargling and screaming. Don't ask me why is caring about his dental hygiene at this moment, it just is.)

google · 04-19-2009, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [R-DEV]Hans Martin Slayer

Today, i proudly present to you my first map that will make appearance in PR 0.9.

i've been working on this project for about 1.5 years now and i've learned a lot during this time so i hope to continue contibuting maps for PR in the future.

- thanks to everyone who commented on my work so far, giving crits etc. that's much appreciated. special thanks go out to rhino for all the helpful pr mapping tuts.

like many guys i started this project in the community modding section and got promoted to R-CON after a while until i got finally upgraded to DEV.
for those who are interested, that's how it started,
it looked pretty crappy back then :-P: http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f354...fghan-map.html

let's get straight onto the facts:

- Lashkar Valley, Southern Afghanistan.

- Size: 2km

- Gamemodes: Insurgency/ Skirmish

- Assets: Mechanized Infantry/ Light Vehicles

- Teams: German Forces vs Taliban - this might be subject to change, depends if the GF will be ready for 0.9.

MINIMAP

INGAME:

The map looks beautiful, but alas, it's another Insurgency...

**creepin** · 04-19-2009, 04:33 PM

mhhh, i got to see this map 5 months ago, and i must say, it looks even awesomer now, even though it really looked awesome back then too.

**creepin** · 04-19-2009, 04:39 PM

some more dev sauce, enjoy!:

By creepinshadow at 2009-04-19

By creepinshadow at 2009-04-19

note that these were still WIP shots.

**Axis_Sniper** · 04-19-2009, 08:10 PM

That map looks great, and if they are able to get the GF out by .9 it would be fantastic.

Paine · 04-19-2009, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Axis_Sniper

That map looks great, and if they are able to get the GF out by .9 it would be fantastic.

Damn girl friends, always taking time away from PR.

**Ghost Dog** · 04-20-2009, 03:22 AM

If that 's the final view distance, it 's gonna be sniper paradise.

I 'd rather see some more non-insurgency maps though, but if this introduces the German Forces, I guess I can live with it

.

**Axis_Sniper** · 04-20-2009, 03:31 AM

I'm just throwing out another idea here, so stick with me on this.

I was thinking of giving the Iraqi Insurgents 1 ticket for every civie that is killed. So instead of the Coalition only needing to destroy the 10 caches, they would need to destroy all 12 if they kill enough civies. If tickets go beyond the 20 needed for the final 2 caches, it would begin to bleed after the final cache is destroyed.

It would help on Iraqis Insurgents just throwing their lives away, keep the Coalition on their toes/less trigger happy, as well as keep in touch with the realism.