Originally Posted by Charity Case

I would be willing to make a tutorial video which covers the TG server rules. Currently, I'm still working on my commander asset tutorial, but once I finish it I could do a TG rules tutorial.

Originally Posted by TheSkudDestroyer

And if we make the video impossible to skip directly to the end...

Madness!

Originally Posted by BostonBob

The problem is ,,, no matter what you do ,,,there are people that will always break the rules...There is always some one who thinks they are above the rules....And its always the same little napoleons...

So to minimize problems there Sq leaders have to action...

If any player in my sq breaks a server rule i always correct him ...
99% stay,,, the willing to follow the rules players,,, the rest leave due to constant correction....

Cause if your not having fun ,,,I m not having fun ....

And i m sorry to here there are some people who think you can t run faster with your knife out,,, when it s a known fact ,,you can run faster with your knife out...."Its just Science" ...I say good day Sir..

Originally Posted by asch

...
Light Anti-Tank (LAT)

On to the topic of the Anti-Tank kit. I'll start off by first discussing LAT. The primary targets for this weapon consist of lightly armored vehicles like the Humvee. I don't believe there is a question of use here.

The questions begin to circulate when it comes to the LAT use against infantry. This is a large grey area and very much situational-based. The use of LAT against infantry does happen in the real world. It's how and when that is not always correctly reflected with our use in-game.

A common use for LAT is as a bunker-buster when rifle fire does not suffice. This use isn't necessarily based on the number of infantry units, rather how the infantry unit(s) are entrenched and what objects are nearby for the projectile to hit and cause collateral damage. If we can remember this, hopefully our use of LAT against infantry will better simulate the environment.

Examples of CORRECT use:

a) The enemy infantry unit(s) are defending within a bunker. The LAT is a valid weapon to fire into the bunker to cause damage to the maximum number of targets.

b) The enemy infantry unit(s) are hiding behind an option like a barrel, tree, or wall opening. The LAT is a valid weapon that is intended to destroy the object providing cover and cause collateral damage to the enemy.

c) The enemy infantry unit(s) are moving along a wall, however they are not behind any objects as cover. This particular example allows for the use of LAT or rifle fire.

Hopefully we can see the commonality of those examples. The enemy unit(s) are entrenched with solid objects nearby for the projectile to hit.

What we don't see in those examples are the LAT projectiles directly impacting the enemy unit or targeting units not entrenched near some solid object. We should not be targeting infantry units directly in the open field at close to medium range.

I mention close to medium range purposefully. Long range LAT use against stationary infantry in an open area is a different situation that many call this AT SNIPING. Let's define "long-range" as a distance that rifle fire can not easily take down a target. In this situation the player must use their best judgment. If a target is off in the distance and not reachable by normal rifle fire, then they may switch to the next best feasible weapon at their disposal. The LAT kit can be properly used here.

EDIT for clarification: Using the LAT at long range still requires some object to be targeting. Using in the open field probably isn't the proper use, however if the enemy infantry unit(s) is on a mountain side, the mountain will provide the solid backdrop.