![]() |


|
|||||||
| Battlefield 2 - Project Reality Mod Discussion for the BF2 - Project Reality Mod |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 29
Posts: 1,789
|
Greetings. Much has changed since .4. The maps among them.
This thread will allow us to give positive and negative feedback on certain maps that are on the server. Feel free to use this format. Score things on a 0-5 scale. Zero being horrible, and five being excellent. Write the type of map, the mode, and the number of players (16, 32, 64) Also: A. Map consistency with the server. (a five would mean virtually no CTD). B. Gameplay C. Realism D. Scrim potential (and population setting) E. favored side. (Type the side it favors, and then the valued number. 0 being no favor, and five meaning the most favored.) Finally, right down a subjective review and or write what made the map experience negative or positive. Finally, put if you believe the map should stay or go.
__________________
(PO3) Marcinko_R. (BF2 PR .509) Squad Member (CPO) Marcinko_R. (BF2 PR .509) Squad Leader (LCDR) Marcinko_R. (BF2 PR .509) Commander Squad Member pledge to their SL:http://www.tacticalgamer.com/battlef...ad-leader.html Squad Leader pledge to their team:http://www.tacticalgamer.com/battlef...r-platoon.html Commander pledge to their SL:http://www.tacticalgamer.com/battlef...d-leaders.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 29
Posts: 1,789
|
Re: PR .5 map feedback/impressions
Orginialy posted by BigGayAll on 2-13-07
(By the way I move that Muttrah, a very nice map, be taken out of rotation until it is fixed. It is so imbalanced, and I've never seen a remotely decent game since 0.5 and aas on that map. I believe they will add a cappable flag to this map except docks, probably hotel. Imo it is unplayable in it's current state. The mec always rushes the docks instead of taking the grey flags. The devs clearly hadn't realized the pubbie's unconditional love of 1337 pwnage, even if it ruins the game.) For the full post see this thread, post numba 3: http://www.tacticalgamer.com/battlef...opter-atc.html
__________________
(PO3) Marcinko_R. (BF2 PR .509) Squad Member (CPO) Marcinko_R. (BF2 PR .509) Squad Leader (LCDR) Marcinko_R. (BF2 PR .509) Commander Squad Member pledge to their SL:http://www.tacticalgamer.com/battlef...ad-leader.html Squad Leader pledge to their team:http://www.tacticalgamer.com/battlef...r-platoon.html Commander pledge to their SL:http://www.tacticalgamer.com/battlef...d-leaders.html |
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South east england
Posts: 8,839
|
Re: PR .5 map feedback/impressions
I like Basra. I can't really offer more than that, because while my squad was attempting to take the first flag the other night, the rest of our entire team was pinned down in our base by (judging by the targets being painted on minimap) 1 bad guy.
I don't like any of the UK maps because I don't like the UK weapons, and those ghastly slow things on wheels are just no substitute for a humvee or a UH60.
__________________
BFCL TF2 league admin
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 29
Posts: 1,789
|
Re: PR .5 map feedback/impressions
Orginaly posted be tHa KhAn on 2-9-2007.
"Yes the Dam part 2 is a terrible map. There is not enough movement. The problem was not tactics, but just the innability to move effectively even with vehicles. By the time a squad loaded up and moved out the flag could have flipped twice by the time they got there. It caused the entire team to be fragmented over the front line flags and spread the action so thin most of the round we were reduced to using the beach as a resort to do swimming and target practice and we were the flag they had to take to get on to the next at west beach. That map wore on and on with no real joy. Only those who were very familiar seemed to be able to accomplish some movement, but even then it was very limited and not fun at all in my opinion." The coplete post can be found at this thread, post numba 5 http://www.tacticalgamer.com/battlef...0-5-games.html
__________________
(PO3) Marcinko_R. (BF2 PR .509) Squad Member (CPO) Marcinko_R. (BF2 PR .509) Squad Leader (LCDR) Marcinko_R. (BF2 PR .509) Commander Squad Member pledge to their SL:http://www.tacticalgamer.com/battlef...ad-leader.html Squad Leader pledge to their team:http://www.tacticalgamer.com/battlef...r-platoon.html Commander pledge to their SL:http://www.tacticalgamer.com/battlef...d-leaders.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 29
Posts: 1,789
|
Re: PR .5 map feedback/impressions
I am very immpressed with Qwai River 64 player.
This should stay on the roation like no other. This could be my favorite map. Well balanced, and large. nuff said. PS. virtually null lag.
__________________
(PO3) Marcinko_R. (BF2 PR .509) Squad Member (CPO) Marcinko_R. (BF2 PR .509) Squad Leader (LCDR) Marcinko_R. (BF2 PR .509) Commander Squad Member pledge to their SL:http://www.tacticalgamer.com/battlef...ad-leader.html Squad Leader pledge to their team:http://www.tacticalgamer.com/battlef...r-platoon.html Commander pledge to their SL:http://www.tacticalgamer.com/battlef...d-leaders.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Age: 20
Posts: 1,133
|
Re: PR .5 map feedback/impressions
Muttrah City needs to go for now... Nobody really knows how to fly, so the US carrier is always teamkill after teamkill. Just now I got charged with about 7 teamkills because someone bumped into my littlebird with theirs, causing me to get kicked. I've never seen the US have much success on this map.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Manchester, England
Age: 27
Posts: 310
|
Re: PR .5 map feedback/impressions
I quite like muttrah city and I've had some very good games on it as US.
I dont feel that "Nobody really knows how to fly" is really a valid reason to have it taken out of rotation. nobody is going to learn if its not there, just give it some time. As for Al Basrah, well I had my first whole round tonight in a A10 and I came away with 120 kills, 2 deaths (both my own fault after clipping obsticles after diving in) and 2800 points! I'm not sure if its was a severe lack of AA or just the fact that the opposition wasnt using it enough/properly, only time will tell, but it's not really fair giving the US 2 A10's and 2 attack helo's and leaving the insurgents to the slaughter!
__________________
|TG-X|Finestyle 10th Tactical Guard Server Rules and SOP | Kicked? Banned? READ THIS FIRST! Contact an Admin | Nominate your teammates for a ribbon "...We'll take them, we're TG, we're AWESOME!" - WhiskeySix Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 66
|
Re: PR .5 map feedback/impressions
Main problem I see with Muttrah is the spawn issue. At least for USMC, you have a pre-placed rally point at Docks, and, due to the flags being too close to each other, you can only place a squad rally point on the southern hill (and MEC surely knows this)
__________________
The most dangerous thing on a battlefield is an officer with a map. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lincoln NE
Age: 21
Posts: 255
|
Re: PR .5 map feedback/impressions
correlation =/= causation but from what i've seen gulf of oman = massive server death, and thats assuming it loads all the way in at all... its been 3 for 3 today :/
__________________
|TG-Irr|Legato |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 32
Posts: 3,405
|
Re: PR .5 map feedback/impressions
Admin team will post an update on map rotation soon. We have removed some maps due to lag/crash issues and will try them again when server side patch is released next week.
Nothing final yet (discussion going on) but Oman and Muttrah may be categorized as "conditional" meaning they will be put in rotation in the presence of an admin and US CO to coordinate the US offensive. Keep providing feedback gentlemen. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 217
|
Re: PR .5 map feedback/impressions
Quote:
And 2800 points? I took a screen shot of that. Don't you think it is pretty unbalanced when one team has a guy with 2800 points and the other team's top play has 300? They need to make it easier to repair the AA, put more of it, or just take out an A10 and the attack chopper. Also, I think a lot of the maps we all feel are horrible would be way more fun with AAS off. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lincoln NE
Age: 21
Posts: 255
|
Re: PR .5 map feedback/impressions
Quote:
i was in the squad that had found and was controlling the only two (as far as we could tell) insurgent anti air kits. we were going rooftop to rooftop with two stingers me as a police man, and two medics keeping those assets alive and while our kills were rather low (1 a10 and maybe 2 cobras) we sent many a flying craft home early to repair and that alone is worth it. honestly there is so much cover in that map that unless you are taking a flag the air presence isn't too overpowered. remember especially for the a10's if you are attacking a flag there has got to be at least a squad or two of americans there with you, thus mitigating the usefulness of carpet bombing. so in review, leave al basara (sp) alone, its just the nature of the beast
__________________
|TG-Irr|Legato |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Age: 38
Posts: 8,077
|
Re: PR .5 map feedback/impressions
That's an interesting point brought up. The teams are supposed to be asymetrical, so sure, one side has the air power, but as mentioned, the other has faster spawns and who knows what else in their favor.
We need to give the mod more time before we start making judgements or adjustments.
__________________
Battlefield 2/2142 Game Officer Contact me with server/player/admin issues. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() -- Suits are what you wear when doing things you shouldn’t want to do anyway. FROM THE TACTICAL GAMER PRIMER. 3) Support game play in a near-simulation environment. Where the focus of play would not be solely on doing what it takes to win, but doing so utilizing real-world combat strategy and tactics rather than leveraging exploits provided to players by the design of the game engine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lincoln NE
Age: 21
Posts: 255
|
Re: PR .5 map feedback/impressions
Quote:
![]()
__________________
|TG-Irr|Legato |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | ||
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Manchester, England
Age: 27
Posts: 310
|
Re: PR .5 map feedback/impressions
Quote:
__________________
|TG-X|Finestyle 10th Tactical Guard Server Rules and SOP | Kicked? Banned? READ THIS FIRST! Contact an Admin | Nominate your teammates for a ribbon "...We'll take them, we're TG, we're AWESOME!" - WhiskeySix Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|

