![]() |


|
|||||||
| Battlefield 2 - Project Reality Mod Discussion for the BF2 - Project Reality Mod |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#76 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Quebec City, Canada
Age: 28
Posts: 102
|
Re: Intended use of vehicles & weapons
Terminal Boy, please quote the actual rule please. I can't find it.
I do agree with you that this seems to be out of the intended use of HAT kit. But, as you clearly point out, we don't have all the information concerning that specific situation. That's the problem with a gray zone like this... the line is thin between acceptable use and abuse. Form the normal usage, if the enemy squad was not under cover and there was no point target to shoot at (wall, building, etc), that usage was wrong. Otherwise it's acceptable.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 (permalink) | |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Belgium
Age: 26
Posts: 926
|
Re: Intended use of vehicles & weapons
Quote:
Squad: Ambush SL: Me Position: 20m above enemy Situation: Ambush position discovered by enemy after taking out their Warrior. Before being able to relocate we had British forces attacking us, the SL survived the explosion somehow and had troops spawning in. We took out about 5 infantry before I located their SL. We were up on a hill above them and their SL was hiding next to a tree. We had ammo and a RP for supplies but were taking heavy fire. They were all six piled up so I had to take the shot, it was my responsibility as a SL for the safety of my squad. After clearing the rest of the area, we moved the RP and relocated. Now that I think of it, I doubt it even was on the TG server as it was in an early stage of the beta... and as I mentioned the only time I ever used H-AT to take out infantry. Imo taking out an entire squad with one rocket can be more valuable than taking out some noob about to drive his Warrior over a mine... all depends on the situation. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 (permalink) | |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: افغانستان
Posts: 2,449
|
Re: Intended use of vehicles & weapons
Quote:
The other day on OGT we were dropping mines and C4 from the back of a heli which seemed fair to me, though it was largely ineffective anyway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 (permalink) |
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Las Vegas!
Age: 24
Posts: 3,178
|
Re: Intended use of vehicles & weapons
Today, Saber and I were using the Chopper to destroy all the bridges in Al Basrah. It worked with great success!
![]()
__________________
|TG-6th| Dirtboy Need an Admin? | Want to help TG? | The 6th Devil's Brigade ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Jump on it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#81 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: افغانستان
Posts: 2,449
|
Re: Intended use of vehicles & weapons
Apparently that was one of the reasons why the Apache was taken out of Basra though we had it in early beta versions.
I think its quite hard to spot cache and only a few are viewable in that way. I was totally owned by 3 RPG flying this way the other day. Dropping people by a cache is a tiny bit dangerous, bad lz ![]() Raining down C4 on people though is potentially very funny ![]() |
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|

