AT versus hardend positions - discuss - Page 4

**Sabre_Tooth_Tigger** · 08-03-2007, 11:49 AM

The miltia crewmen get uzis /machine pistols

Its laughable how poor LAT is compared to HAT. I'd like to see the difficulty in using the kits reversed, everything except the amount of damage. The main problems are code related I think.

I like how the LAT arcs, it makes it a pain to use at any great distance. If only this could apply to tank rounds and the HAT

Steevo · 08-06-2007, 09:39 AM

You could'nt do that with the HAT since it is a wire-guided antitank missile.
What they could do is make it less effective versus the heavy armor plating on the front and sides of a tank, that way players whould have to aim at its rear or top to destroy the tank.

**Sabre_Tooth_Tigger** · 08-07-2007, 07:06 AM

Its allready reduced in damage vs front plating I find

SiCaRiO · 08-11-2007, 11:12 PM

today , my squad was defending east tower in mestia , we were engaged by enemy fire coming from the sout-east , i saw the soldier who was shooting at us , but i was with the eryx , so i said to my self :"lets wait until someone kill him " , i wait like 3 sec. and nobody kill him , but he kill 2 of our guys ,and he was about to kill our SL , so i decide to shoot at him , and i kil him (

) , then my SL say me : "dont use HAT on infantry ."

:S

08-03-2007, 11:49 AM	#46 (permalink)
Sabre_Tooth_Tigger Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: افغانستان Posts: 2,606	Re: AT versus hardend positions - discuss The miltia crewmen get uzis /machine pistols Its laughable how poor LAT is compared to HAT. I'd like to see the difficulty in using the kits reversed, everything except the amount of damage. The main problems are code related I think. I like how the LAT arcs, it makes it a pain to use at any great distance. If only this could apply to tank rounds and the HAT __________________

08-06-2007, 09:39 AM	#47 (permalink)
Steevo Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Emmeloord, The Netherlands Age: 21 Posts: 218	Re: AT versus hardend positions - discuss You could'nt do that with the HAT since it is a wire-guided antitank missile. What they could do is make it less effective versus the heavy armor plating on the front and sides of a tank, that way players whould have to aim at its rear or top to destroy the tank. __________________

08-07-2007, 07:06 AM	#48 (permalink)
Sabre_Tooth_Tigger Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: افغانستان Posts: 2,606	Re: AT versus hardend positions - discuss Its allready reduced in damage vs front plating I find __________________

08-11-2007, 11:12 PM	#49 (permalink)
SiCaRiO Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 16	Re: AT versus hardend positions - discuss today , my squad was defending east tower in mestia , we were engaged by enemy fire coming from the sout-east , i saw the soldier who was shooting at us , but i was with the eryx , so i said to my self :"lets wait until someone kill him " , i wait like 3 sec. and nobody kill him , but he kill 2 of our guys ,and he was about to kill our SL , so i decide to shoot at him , and i kil him () , then my SL say me : "dont use HAT on infantry ." :S

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Sponsored links

Sponsored links