Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32

geogob · 08-07-2007, 05:04 PM

If kashan 32 supports 64 players (I think it does), i'd like to see it on TG server for a while (and for a change).

In Kashan 32, the airplanes are replaced by gunships. This is the ideal map for gunships IMO. It is still too small for airplanes to behave realistically. On the other hand, gunships can really use the hills to tactically engage armor and ground troops.

Also, airplanes are nearly invulnerable to AA and too dangerous to go out flying in a chopper.

With helicopters only on this map, the dimension of air transport will be opened again, making the game much more dynamic. Faster transit time, larger scale ground armor battles with a greater balance between Ground-Air and Air-Ground attacks. With AA vehicles, flying around with the attack chopper will require real mastery and tactics.

Anyway, just my two cents. I'd really like to see this happen. I think the map would be much more interesting without those jets doing circles in the air. With kashan 32, tanks would fear to see attack helos pop out above any hills all the time.

I really think that gunships can use true to life tactics in this map, unlike jets.

imnotacanadian · 08-07-2007, 05:20 PM

I second that. Maybe it would make Kashan at least bearable (spelling?).

Murderous · 08-07-2007, 05:21 PM

I like the idea of gunships on the map but I love that map simply because of the space you have to fly the jet. I say we have a 64 in the beginning of rotation, and a 32 at the end? On average, thats what, 6 hours or more before you get to the other kashan?

**Schmidty** · 08-07-2007, 05:22 PM

I agree with your idea. It sounds good to me. Maybe we can get an admin to let us try it out for a day or two?

**TheSkudDestroyer** · 08-07-2007, 06:07 PM

Yes please.

FeistySheep. · 08-07-2007, 06:16 PM

Lol, I'm too scared to use the planes anyway because as soon as I get in, I lag like crazy and don't wanna be yelled at by anyone.

**BigGaayAl** · 08-07-2007, 06:20 PM

I love the jets, even though I rarely fly, but I'd also love to play the other version as well. I wouldn't mind seeing both on rotation.

ikill4aliving · 08-07-2007, 06:23 PM

I like the 64 version, but I guess I could live with the 32 for a while. Maybe that would lead to more fun rounds with Dirtboy

**Sabre_Tooth_Tigger** · 08-07-2007, 07:01 PM

Considering how long the map lasts you only want one or the other. Also the maplist loops, you dont want it at the beginning and end

**Dirtboy** · 08-07-2007, 07:41 PM

I am gonna bring this up in the Admin forums...more to come

geogob · 08-07-2007, 07:42 PM

Thank you, Dirtboy!

imnotacanadian · 08-07-2007, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sabre_Tooth_Tigger

Considering how long the map lasts you only want one or the other. Also the maplist loops, you dont want it at the beginning and end

True...and horrible. If the map has to be on the rotation at all,ide rather it be the smaller of the two.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirtboy

I am gonna bring this up in the Admin forums...more to come

Thank you.

fuzzhead · 08-08-2007, 03:21 AM

agreed the 32 player plays much better currently.

the ground based AA is just too ineffective versus jets right now

**Ghost Dog** · 08-08-2007, 06:54 AM

I 've yet to play the 32 version so I 'd love to give it a try. If the majority doesn't like it, there 's always a way back

.

PS: Does it have less CP 's? I hope not.

**Dirtboy** · 08-08-2007, 08:01 AM

I have added it to rotation along with the 64 player version...we will give it a shot and please post feedback!

08-07-2007, 05:04 PM	#1 (permalink)
geogob Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Quebec City, Canada Age: 28 Posts: 102	Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32 If kashan 32 supports 64 players (I think it does), i'd like to see it on TG server for a while (and for a change). In Kashan 32, the airplanes are replaced by gunships. This is the ideal map for gunships IMO. It is still too small for airplanes to behave realistically. On the other hand, gunships can really use the hills to tactically engage armor and ground troops. Also, airplanes are nearly invulnerable to AA and too dangerous to go out flying in a chopper. With helicopters only on this map, the dimension of air transport will be opened again, making the game much more dynamic. Faster transit time, larger scale ground armor battles with a greater balance between Ground-Air and Air-Ground attacks. With AA vehicles, flying around with the attack chopper will require real mastery and tactics. Anyway, just my two cents. I'd really like to see this happen. I think the map would be much more interesting without those jets doing circles in the air. With kashan 32, tanks would fear to see attack helos pop out above any hills all the time. I really think that gunships can use true to life tactics in this map, unlike jets. __________________

08-07-2007, 05:20 PM	#2 (permalink)
imnotacanadian Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Texas (really,I don't live in Canada) Posts: 648	Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32 I second that. Maybe it would make Kashan at least bearable (spelling?).

08-07-2007, 05:21 PM	#3 (permalink)
Murderous Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 73	Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32 I like the idea of gunships on the map but I love that map simply because of the space you have to fly the jet. I say we have a 64 in the beginning of rotation, and a 32 at the end? On average, thats what, 6 hours or more before you get to the other kashan? __________________ Murderous US Army Aviator AH-64D Longbow, UH-60A/L Blackhawk

08-07-2007, 05:22 PM	#4 (permalink)
Schmidty Registered User Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Ft. Bragg Posts: 35	Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32 I agree with your idea. It sounds good to me. Maybe we can get an admin to let us try it out for a day or two?

08-07-2007, 06:07 PM	#5 (permalink)
TheSkudDestroyer Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: NY Posts: 3,207	Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32 Yes please. __________________ \|TG-6th\|Skud BMT Graduate - 320th Training Squadron, Flight 024 "Kids no more!" 8 months Keesler AFB, 1W0X1 - Weather The 6th Devils - Now with MORE Air Force! "...I simply stated "Video Games". They thought I was joking..."

08-07-2007, 06:16 PM	#6 (permalink)
FeistySheep. Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 68	Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32 Lol, I'm too scared to use the planes anyway because as soon as I get in, I lag like crazy and don't wanna be yelled at by anyone.

08-07-2007, 06:20 PM	#7 (permalink)
BigGaayAl Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: gent, belgium Posts: 1,494	Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32 I love the jets, even though I rarely fly, but I'd also love to play the other version as well. I wouldn't mind seeing both on rotation. __________________ Support your right to arm bears. ~Cleveland Amory I am a kind of paranoiac in reverse. I suspect people of plotting to make me happy. ~J.D. Salinger

08-07-2007, 06:23 PM	#8 (permalink)
ikill4aliving Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Arlington City, with my AahGear Posts: 949	Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32 I like the 64 version, but I guess I could live with the 32 for a while. Maybe that would lead to more fun rounds with Dirtboy __________________ \|TG-Irr\| Irregulars Intelligence Officer I semi-retired my M-Gear. I have more KMs on my level 35 AG than I do on my level 60 MG.

08-07-2007, 07:01 PM	#9 (permalink)
Sabre_Tooth_Tigger Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: افغانستان Posts: 2,558	Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32 Considering how long the map lasts you only want one or the other. Also the maplist loops, you dont want it at the beginning and end __________________

08-07-2007, 07:41 PM	#10 (permalink)
Dirtboy Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Some crap hole FOB in Iraq Age: 24 Posts: 3,221	Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32 I am gonna bring this up in the Admin forums...more to come __________________ \|TG-6th\| Dirtboy Need an Admin? \| Want to help TG? \| The 6th Devil's Brigade

08-07-2007, 07:42 PM	#11 (permalink)
geogob Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Quebec City, Canada Age: 28 Posts: 102	Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32 Thank you, Dirtboy! __________________

08-08-2007, 03:21 AM	#13 (permalink)
fuzzhead Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 613	Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32 agreed the 32 player plays much better currently. the ground based AA is just too ineffective versus jets right now

08-08-2007, 06:54 AM	#14 (permalink)
Ghost Dog Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Belgium Age: 26 Posts: 939	Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32 I 've yet to play the 32 version so I 'd love to give it a try. If the majority doesn't like it, there 's always a way back . PS: Does it have less CP 's? I hope not. __________________ Xfire: Iaintyourm8 \| Ingame: \|TG\| GhostDog \| Steam: Zuigmijnballen Nominate a player \| Support the community \| List of admins

08-08-2007, 08:01 AM	#15 (permalink)
Dirtboy Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Some crap hole FOB in Iraq Age: 24 Posts: 3,221	Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32 I have added it to rotation along with the 64 player version...we will give it a shot and please post feedback! __________________ \|TG-6th\| Dirtboy Need an Admin? \| Want to help TG? \| The 6th Devil's Brigade

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links