Go Back   Tactical Gamer > Tactical > Battlefield 2 > Battlefield 2 - Tactics and Missions Discussion > Battlefield 2 Project Reality Tactics Discussion

Battlefield 2 Project Reality Tactics Discussion Discussion forum for BF2 project reality specific strategy, tactics, and mission discussions.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-24-2009, 12:33 AM   #1 (permalink)
 
Berlancic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Age: 14
Posts: 957
Tournaments Joined: 0
Tournaments Won: 0
Roles of APC and IFV

*Inspired by several posts of 1 thread in the TG Project Reality Forums.

Some people get confused as to what the difference is of an APC and an IFV. I will simply define them.

APC:
The term APC is an acronym for Armoured Personnel Carrier. It is a vehicle that is designed to transport infantry units to the battle zone via ground.

IFV:
This term is an acronym for Infantry Fighting Vehicle. It is a vehicles primarily designed to provide friendly infantry with heavy fire/suppression of enemy targets in a battle zone via ground.

In Project Reality, it's quite easy to classify these vehicles:
*An APC will always have at least 6 passenger seats which allow transport for 1 infantry squad. In addition, they are equipped with weapons less than 20mm.
*Most IFVs also have passenger seats (excluding the British Scimitar IFV). And have weapons that are 20mm or higher. They're usually the things that are going to kill you more often.

List of APCs:
*Chinese WZ551A (I'm not sure if those are the right numbers). US Stryker. Russian/MEC BTR-60. (Note, the BRDM is not an APC, it is more of an armoured car. It provides only 2 passenger seats.)

List of IFVs:
*US Bradley. Russian/MEC BMP-3. Chinese WZ551. USMC LAV-25. British Scimitar. British Warrior.

After having played with the many IFVs, it's obvious that some do a better job than others. The Bradley and BMP-3 have an anti-tank ability with their TOW launchers (as well as the BMP-3 105mm cannon). Where as the Warrior, for example, has no TOWs, only cannon and coax.

Remember what the roles are. Don't overly use an APC to do an IFV's job. Because of their lower caliber weapons, it is best the APCs stay behind most of the action and play more defensively to avoid loss of the APC asset. Where as IFV's, with their advanced firepower, can act more offensively and move up by side with the infantry. Sometimes you may have to use an APC like an IFV, if the APC is the only asset you get.

A great example of where IFV and APCs come together is the 0.86 version of Qwai river on the Chinese team. There are 3 APCs (WZ551A) and 3 IFVs (WZ551) availaible to the Chinese. And it's ideal to have the IFVs up front suppressing enemy forces while the APCs provide primary transport and light fire behind/up to the main frontline.
__________________
|TG-69th|Berlancic2

"What the ****... I don't sleep with the new guys. They are too new." GiJoe
"I can do this in the beginning of the day before I get pissed at how stupid people can be" ... Chrisweb talking about Learn TG SQs

Berlancic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Advertisement



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
©2004-2008 - Tactical Gamer - All Rights Reserved