New private ranking system - Page 8

BigGaayAl · 02-10-2006, 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snail88

as soon as you introduce unlocks that people can GAIN then you will have an unfair advantage.

Not if you would get all unlocks after 5 kills. The only thing needed would be a patch or something from the statssystem. A simple server message can fix this.

My point was that I suspect you can introduce unlocks WITHOUT creating unfair advantage. People who can't download a patch are more inclined to playing (official) ranked anyway I would think.

**FPS_Douglas** · 02-13-2006, 02:13 PM

I think some of the SF unlocks are way too unbalanced for the skill level of most TGer's.

Thierry · 02-13-2006, 06:59 PM

Gimme a DAO-12 and I'll change your mind

**FPS_Douglas** · 02-14-2006, 08:23 AM

Ya, the DAO is nasty in the hands of someone who knows how to use it. Body armour + body armour = domination at CQB. I was thinking more about the F2000 or whatever it is called. With similar damage, equal accuracy and a larger clip than a G3 it is rediculous. Add in the GL and it just gets silly.

BigGaayAl · 02-14-2006, 11:36 AM

plz remove - wrong topic

Thierry · 02-16-2006, 07:04 AM

If they were to improve the rate of fire of the P90 (and the ridicolous 3D model and firing sound while their at it) it would be a good opponent to the DAO12, it wont ever own it at less then 5 feet but beyond that it has a good chance.
Maybe we can set 1 unlock to the TG players? That someone has to prove around here that they can play by TG's rules, that you've been here a while and that you can use 1 unlock, just 1. I'd probably pick the P90 as on TG a DAO-12 range-CQB is more rare.