Vehicle assets - Page 5

**Specterr** · 03-11-2008, 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eroak

Bear in mind that we don't allow ramming!

I think ramming might be the wrong word for this tactic...nudging or grinding might be better since your not ramming the other tank, your pressing your tank up against it tight to get under it's turret, at least that's what I do in the situation...if you charge at it full speed that might be a different story.

**Reaperassault** · 03-11-2008, 01:53 AM

any sort of intentional contact to gain an advantage is wrong, as far as I know.

you wouldn't take a M1A1 and ram another tank, that is what the main cannon is for

**DaBrit** · 03-11-2008, 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eroak

Bear in mind that we don't allow ramming!

That smile strikes fear into my heart.

**Rasta-GR** · 03-11-2008, 10:58 AM

This is the "APC" squad from Belgrade / Berlin.

APC squad agrees 100% with Eroak 1st post.

APC out.

**Lorax74** · 03-11-2008, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaperassault

any sort of intentional contact to gain an advantage is wrong, as far as I know.

Correct.

**Lyramion** · 03-11-2008, 04:17 PM

Oh im guilty then! Last Berlin a Pac APC tried to rush thru and I sort of blocked its way and..... omg im so sorry.... I am requesting a 1 week ban please

**Augustus Gloop** · 03-11-2008, 04:38 PM

How about we accept your apology at face value and consider it a lesson learned?

**Specterr** · 03-11-2008, 05:16 PM

looks like I have to re-read the server rules

**Lorax74** · 03-11-2008, 05:23 PM

Blocking a path is legitimate, T-Boning or playing bumper cars is not.

**Eroak** · 03-11-2008, 05:52 PM

Aye, blocks and cutting off is OK. But any intentional ram with another vehicle isn't ok.

**rage4order** · 04-15-2008, 06:24 PM

*BUMP* This topic was brought up again in TS today, newer TG'ers take a peek.

sgt.rob · 04-15-2008, 07:40 PM

i'm sure proper judgement will be used before banning somone, as inexperienced pilots may at times plow head long into another transport, or during a dive bombing manuever understimate their speed and crash into the ground vehicle they were attempting to target. i am guilty of this as i am sure alot of people are. theres a benefit to having a dedicated "gunship" squad though.

03-11-2008, 01:53 AM	#62 (permalink)
Reaperassault Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Not here Posts: 1,851	Re: Vehicle assets any sort of intentional contact to gain an advantage is wrong, as far as I know. you wouldn't take a M1A1 and ram another tank, that is what the main cannon is for __________________

03-11-2008, 10:58 AM	#64 (permalink)
Rasta-GR Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Greece Age: 41 Posts: 540	Re: Vehicle assets This is the "APC" squad from Belgrade / Berlin. APC squad agrees 100% with Eroak 1st post. APC out. __________________ TG-E1st TacticalGamer European Division \| Team up with us today! New to TG? - TG Primer - BF2142 Rules - TG University - TeamSpeak Report Infractions - Contact a game Admin - Submit a nomination for an award "All wars are fought for money" (Socrates, 470-399 BC) "Only the dead have seen the end of the war" (Plato, 427-347 BC) "We make war that we may live in peace" (Aristotle, 384-322 BC)

03-11-2008, 04:17 PM	#66 (permalink)
Lyramion Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Germany Posts: 886	Re: Vehicle assets Oh im guilty then! Last Berlin a Pac APC tried to rush thru and I sort of blocked its way and..... omg im so sorry.... I am requesting a 1 week ban please __________________ Stage6 My BF2142 Videos Youtube

03-11-2008, 04:38 PM	#67 (permalink)
Augustus Gloop Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Gone for the weekend folks! Age: 32 Posts: 2,589	Re: Vehicle assets How about we accept your apology at face value and consider it a lesson learned? __________________

03-11-2008, 05:16 PM	#68 (permalink)
Specterr Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Canada, Eh Age: 27 Posts: 324	Re: Vehicle assets looks like I have to re-read the server rules __________________

03-11-2008, 05:23 PM	#69 (permalink)
Lorax74 Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Bridgewater, NJ Age: 34 Posts: 6,063	Re: Vehicle assets Blocking a path is legitimate, T-Boning or playing bumper cars is not. __________________ Ikariam (Alpha) Bayhios [35:70] > Truax (c) - Wine Streardeos [39:70] > New Truax - Marble Meikaios[35:68] > Truax Minor - Crystal

03-11-2008, 05:52 PM	#70 (permalink)
Eroak Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: In a AC-130 shooting 105's at you. Age: 28 Posts: 3,019	Re: Vehicle assets Aye, blocks and cutting off is OK. But any intentional ram with another vehicle isn't ok. __________________ Do you know your roots? R.I.P. Lost Fires - June 16, 2001 - June 18, 2008 An EverQuest guild - We miss you Faylon

04-15-2008, 06:24 PM	#71 (permalink)
rage4order Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Northern Colorado Age: 38 Posts: 3,053	Re: Vehicle assets BUMP This topic was brought up again in TS today, newer TG'ers take a peek. __________________ \|TG-8th\|RAGE *SigPic provided by www.davidclair.com* New to TG start HERE * 8th Mercs * Admin List * Supporting Membership *De Inimico Non Loquaris Sed Cogites* *****

04-15-2008, 07:40 PM	#72 (permalink)
sgt.rob Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: North Carolina Posts: 64	Re: Vehicle assets i'm sure proper judgement will be used before banning somone, as inexperienced pilots may at times plow head long into another transport, or during a dive bombing manuever understimate their speed and crash into the ground vehicle they were attempting to target. i am guilty of this as i am sure alot of people are. theres a benefit to having a dedicated "gunship" squad though. __________________ and your very flesh shall be a great poem w.whitman

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links