-
03-21-2008, 02:13 PM #76
Re: TG-3rd and Community. AKA "Why We Lock Squads"
I´m a double agent but if I tell you more I´d have to kill you.... and revive.. then kill you again..... till we both get banned for statpadding.
Now back to focusing on Teamstacking please!
-
03-21-2008, 02:14 PM #77
-
03-21-2008, 07:43 PM #78
Re: TG-3rd and Community. AKA "Why We Lock Squads"
The soldier formerly known as, Eroak.





From the TG Primer: 2) Create an environment where there is
mutual respect for your fellow gamers and where all members
would be working together to advance the enjoyment of their hobby.
-
03-21-2008, 10:28 PM #79
Re: TG-3rd and Community. AKA "Why We Lock Squads"
Lyra cant join any IHS because his presence would automatically put the roster limit over cap.

-
03-21-2008, 11:04 PM #80
-
03-22-2008, 06:49 AM #81
Re: TG-3rd and Community. AKA "Why We Lock Squads"
Lyra iZ 1337 thread ftw
Anger is a gift - Malcolm X

-
03-22-2008, 07:01 AM #82
Re: TG-3rd and Community. AKA "Why We Lock Squads"
Anger is a gift - Malcolm X

-
03-22-2008, 09:55 PM #83
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Age
- 30
- Posts
- 202
Re: TG-3rd and Community. AKA "Why We Lock Squads"
I didn't know Lyra was "Chuck Norris". Now its clear.


-
03-23-2008, 06:31 PM #84
-
03-23-2008, 08:13 PM #85
Re: TG-3rd and Community. AKA "Why We Lock Squads"
While AFK.
Anger is a gift - Malcolm X

-
04-04-2008, 04:33 PM #86
not referencing third specifically, but my irratation with locks in general is when its for example
3 full squads and a locked with only 4 in it.
Then i'm forced to make the army of one squad... :P but aside from that, personally, too each his or her own :P
woot u just taught all us noobs how to stat pad, THANKS! :P lolol
-
04-05-2008, 09:08 AM #87
Re: TG-3rd and Community. AKA "Why We Lock Squads"
I had the pleasure of playing a couple of round in an all E-1st squad yesterday....yes 6 of us! We did very well together. Unfortunately we did too well and the other team suffered a mass exodus! The next round started 23 v 11 !!! So our whole squad changed sides!
That evened it up to 17 v 17. It was our choice to switch teams as we spotted the imbalance and it was shortly after that the server crashed
I now fully understand the will to play together, and the need for balanced teams. Unfortunately I can't remember which one of the E-1st said it, but the quote was something like "maybe we shouldn't do this again, maybe we should split between the teams"......an excellent Idea if that brings balance but the point is I'm sure the 3rd would say something similar in the same situation.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)




Reply With Quote






Bookmarks