![]() |


|
|||||||
| Battlefield 2142 - General Discussion General discussion for Battlefield 2142 |
| View Poll Results: Do you think we need to see change in the Conquest server? | |||
| Yes, change is good! |
|
6 | 16.67% |
| No, I like it as it is. |
|
19 | 52.78% |
| I'm fine with it either way, so long as I can kill people! |
|
11 | 30.56% |
| Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Muncie, IN
Age: 24
Posts: 1,032
|
Do you think we need to see change in the Conquest server?
Since Rage brought it up, I'm going to open a second poll here. Please feel free to add comments as you see fit.
__________________
"Remember to pillage BEFORE you burn!" "Rule 39: There is no such thing as "overkill". There is only "open fire" and "I need to reload". "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Age: 25
Posts: 50
|
Re: Do you think we need to see change in the Conquest server?
i like the conquest server as-is. i think we should leave it and play around with the other server.
why change something that seems to be working and is consistently full? |
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Northampton, MA
Age: 48
Posts: 205
|
Re: Do you think we need to see change in the Conquest server?
I have always been partial to ConQ and something about the TG servers drew me here. I'm not sure what it is. I really enjoy the people but dislike the TK - points ratio. I think that maybe my only issue and in the end its on me for the TK anyway. I think that with all the servers I have played on from Moon to 82ID to D is G I believe this one is run the tightest and fairest. It offers good game play against great players and the bull**** is at a minimum if at all. I know that some of the veterans here can probably think of some changes but ask yourself this what keeps bringing in the new people like myself? I was here less that 48 hours and was a supporting member. I truly believe as a player I have found a new home. I will go with the flow but I can not think of a thing that needs changing...thats my 2¢...JJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In a AC-130 shooting 105's at you.
Age: 28
Posts: 3,139
|
Re: Do you think we need to see change in the Conquest server?
I like it the way it is on a personal level. Maybe a extra armor map. Don't take what I say is the way it's gonna be. I'll listen to the community if there is demand.
__________________
![]() Do you know your roots? R.I.P. Lost Fires - June 16, 2001 - June 18, 2008 An EverQuest guild - We miss you Faylon |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Durango, CO
Age: 36
Posts: 251
|
Re: Do you think we need to see change in the Conquest server?
I'm like the main Conq server as is. Always OK with whatever maps are in the rotation, but plain ol' 2142 is great.
__________________
|TG-9th| BBgun. - I'll put your eye out, kid. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Muncie, IN
Age: 24
Posts: 1,032
|
Re: Do you think we need to see change in the Conquest server?
I need to amend - this is a poll being done to gauge community interest only. It was not started or undertaken by any of the Administrative staff, and there is no implied or express guarantee that action will or will not be taken based off it. This is merely a poll from a member of the community.
![]()
__________________
"Remember to pillage BEFORE you burn!" "Rule 39: There is no such thing as "overkill". There is only "open fire" and "I need to reload". "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 872
|
Re: Do you think we need to see change in the Conquest server?
I voted "Yes change is good" but I feel that small changes are good, not necessarily "big" changes. The conquest server is a lot of fun to play, and I would not like to see sweeping changes that will alienate community members, but possibly more frequent alterations to the map rotation would be great.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North Port, Florida
Age: 26
Posts: 2,349
|
Re: Do you think we need to see change in the Conquest server?
I wouldn't mind seeing Verdun in there a bit more, but overall, I don't much care. I think the conquest server is doing its job outstandingly, as the constant influx of new members shows. I'd much rather us play around with the second server; it's always been something of a guinea pig, anyway.
![]()
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() my tank is burning not an enemy in sight Arithea lurks -Spiff913 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 186
|
Re: Do you think we need to see change in the Conquest server?
As I mentioned in the other thread, the popularity of the server speaks for itself. Even if there were other great teamwork servers out there, if they had bad map rotations they wouldn't be popular.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 51
|
Re: Do you think we need to see change in the Conquest server?
I'm fine with it. The only thing I don't like is Tampa. It's just too huge. I loved huge armor maps in 1942 and DC mod, but somehow I get no pleasure out of this one in 2142. Other people seem to enjoy it, though, so I voted no but just wanted to make this observation so you have a clear picture of where I stand.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|

