You can't win unless you take the Titan and the several times I've played as a Commander it's been nearly impossible to get everyone on the same page. Most people, myself included up until a week or so ago didn't understand how important that single flag is. We have a lot of people that are playing this game for their score and don't really care about winning the round or what it takes to accomplish that.

I've been playing this game long enough that my score doesn't really concern me anymore. I'd like to actually win a few games which seems to be a rarity these days. Anyhow, as a map it seems rather interesting but I have to agree with Zohar that it's too restrictive. Why have all of that armor if you can't even maneuver around? Tampa, Verdun, and one other map, can't think of it are the only other maps with that much armor and they are much bigger by comparison.

Like many of the older TG'ers I've gotten accustomed to playing infantry only maps so I kind of suck with armor. I can't fly a gunship for crap and if I get a kill it's only because I crashed into someone. Maybe it's just that the infantry biased folks, like myself, aren't comfortable with the vehicle centric maps. I don't know but personally I could do without the map.

Someone else mentioned how complicated it is and that it's only fun if you have a capable commander and a good team. Don't expect to win the round if your team isn't working together. Whereas the defending team....not sure if it's PAC, can practically play half-hearted and still pull off a win. That to me reaks of inbalance. I don't expect the map to be "fair" but it could at least be balanced and I don't see how Wake Island is balanced. It heavily favors the defending team.