Originally Posted by Reaperassault

your right, you should stop complaining

Oh screw you, I manage to tolerate maps I don't enjoy to get to the maps I do, and they show up rarely at best. I made a map rotation that sacrificed for the enjoyment of everyone instead of just myself. Versus you who wants to remove Titan completely because you can't stand playing it once a day, because it's too long of an interruption before you can get back to your ADHD spamming of chokepoints with explosives. If the game is that unbearably slow, they made a game without any pesky vehicles to slow down your killcount based around two-minute rounds: http://www.tacticalgamer.com/counter-strike-source/

Originally Posted by Mech__Warrior

The reason why I hate chokepoint maps is because it often turns into a grind-fest. The defenders die a lot and it's just not fun in my opinion. It seems like it takes forever.

I don't like them because, as I said, they tend to be extremely formulaic. Buggy rush at start, mine Toll, if they don't get one of those rear flags in the first few minutes, the rest of the map is going to play out on Toll. Whenever Toll is lost or the attackers manage to cap a rearward flag, the map becomes a lot of fun but unfortunately that very rarely happens. It's like the BF2 Karkand map (I think that was it?) A well-designed city map with an atrocious chokepoint right at the start, 95% of games were fought over that first flag.

Tunis I think is just too small for the player numbers - if the upper area where baby Tunis is were unlocked that'd be pretty cool. Flags just tend to be chased in a circle until someone inevitably wins via attrition. It keeps the action up, but the overall strategy always is very ad-lib.

If people want to play them, I have no problem playing them. I just don't like seeing Gib Tunis Cerbere * Gib Tunis Cerbere ad infinitum. The game shipped with more maps for a reason.