Re: Statistics Series: Hours SL+CO/SM

**FYAH29** · 07-17-2009, 05:51 PM

SL: 102
CO: 6
SM: 748

= 0.14

Way to contribute FYAH!

**Sargentkyle23** · 07-17-2009, 06:22 PM

Squad-Leader: 28:34:27
Commander: 00:00:18

Squad-member: 71:29:06

28.5/71.5= .4 O_O

**SharinganTH1422** · 07-17-2009, 07:03 PM

Originally Posted by Sargentkyle23

Commander: 00:00:18

18 seconds of awesome

**Lunien** · 07-17-2009, 10:27 PM

SL: 97:53:50 (98)
CO: 3:57:03 (4)

SM: 815:34:58 (815.5)

102/815.5= 0.12507664 (Yeah I don't lead/command much at all)

**SincereApology** · 07-17-2009, 10:42 PM

sl 137
co 51
sm 323

0.58

**Reaperassault** · 07-17-2009, 11:10 PM

SL 82.73
CO 1.33
SM 40.95
(SL+CO)/SM = 2.05

Good to see this kind of information, these are a lot of fun

**Crux** · 07-17-2009, 11:16 PM

I guess I'll end the suspense.

Squad Member 00 09:05
Squad Leader 03 20:03
Commander 00 00:00

3:20/0:09 = 10.22

**Tigerblitz** · 07-17-2009, 11:22 PM

You've never been CO crux? Any reason why

**Crux** · 07-17-2009, 11:41 PM

Originally Posted by Tigerblitz

You've never been CO crux? Any reason why

I have 2 hours COing with my old soldier

As far as reasons... I just enjoy shooting people too much. As a CO I'd be stuck to killing people every 1.5-2 mins with orbital strikes. I'm much more effective with a rifle in my hand, and I can SL while killing a bunch of folks so it just is more fun that way

**Tigerblitz** · 07-17-2009, 11:47 PM

Eh to each his own.

**Reaperassault** · 07-18-2009, 01:09 AM

Which soldier is that Crux? or did you just forget a lot of numbers which were replaced by zeros? or if those numbers are correct 3 and 1/2 hours of play time is not quite enough for the stats series

**DocGuo** · 07-18-2009, 02:21 AM

SL: 588.5 hrs
CO: 92 hrs
SM: 341 hrs

Result: 1.9956

Yikes....I think only Sidious beat me in total time...whew....

**Greyed** · 07-18-2009, 02:55 AM

Just wanted to pipe up with a comment here about this ratio. Don't take a low CO+SL/SM ratio as a bad thing. As someone in private once said to me (on an unrelated topic, but I digress) some people are better squad members than squad leaders.

Also remember that in any given (normal day) round there is a maximum of 9 SL/COs for 23 players (46 players total, /2). Of course on any given round we're not going to have 8 SLs. 4-5 is more like it. So in an average round we'll have 18 SMs to 4 SLs + 1 CO or 5/18 = 0.28. Or you'd be SL/CO once out of every four rounds.

So if everyone played on the same side and rotated in and out of the SL/CO spots across rounds that would be right around the "perfect" average. Any more than that and you SL/CO more than a simple rotation would account for. Any less than that and you SM more than a simple rotation would account for.

Unlike Revives/hour of Assault which is a SOP and something we should all look to increase (especially me with my really low revives/hour) this one is just a good indication of those who like to CO/SL (> 0.28 ratio) and those who prefer to SM (<0.28).

**Fruvous** · 07-18-2009, 03:56 AM

Originally Posted by Greyed

some people are better squad members than squad leaders

And some people are better squad leaders than squad members ^^

**Crux** · 07-18-2009, 08:27 AM

Originally Posted by Reaperassault

Which soldier is that Crux? or did you just forget a lot of numbers which were replaced by zeros? or if those numbers are correct 3 and 1/2 hours of play time is not quite enough for the stats series

That would be 3 and a half days Reap. It comes down a bit if you add my other soldier in, but still about double yours if you're worried that I'm cheating my way to victory

Thread Tools

Display