+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 84
Discussion: Battlefield 2142 / Battlefield 2142 - General Discussion - Statistics Series: Hours SL+CO/SM - For detailed information on this series, as well as information on HOW to do it,
-
07-17-2009, 10:20 AM #1
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Posts
- 2,344
Statistics Series: Hours (SL+CO)/SM
For detailed information on this series, as well as information on HOW to do it, please visit the original thread.
--
AWARD NAME: Control Freak
Please find your hours played as Squad Leader, add it to your hours played commander. Then divide this by the number of hours played as a Squad Member Feel free to round to the nearest hour. Do not include lone wolfing hours in your numbers
To qualify for this award, you must have played at least 48 hours. Contrary to last time, feel free to combined accounts if that's what you want to do (though you don't have to).
Don't forget to post not only your final number but the other three numbers as well.
Remember, if you're in the lead, post your number in bold. If you think you're going to win hands down, you might want to hold off for a dramatic entrance after people have posted. Please post even if you're not going to win at all!
---
Previous Awards:
7/10 Medic-Efficiency (Revives to Hours Assault): FrozenInferno (48.43)Last edited by Zoraster; 07-17-2009 at 11:32 AM.
-
07-17-2009, 10:23 AM #2
Re: Statistics Series: Hours SL+CO/SM
What about hours as lone wolf?
As of this morning:
Squad-Member 70:34:31
Squad-Leader 08:32:21
LoneWolf 05:40:41
Commander 04:59:25
Rounding it out:
5 + 8.5 / 70.5 = 0.1915 or ~19%
-
07-17-2009, 10:44 AM #3
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
- Age
- 41
- Posts
- 1,666
Re: Statistics Series: Hours SL+CO/SM
Squad-Leader: 27:10
Commander: 0:00
Squad-member: 330:17
330:17/27:10 = .08 or 8%
Dang, no wonder Drennyn and Draken always bitch at me that I don't squad lead enough.
|TG-55| Infantry Division - Captain
-
07-17-2009, 11:06 AM #4
Re: Statistics Series: Hours SL+CO/SM
Squad-Member 651:02:17
Squad-Leader 165:06:33
Commander 15:46:57
(165 + 16) / 651 = 0.278
I know how little squad leading I do, so I know we're going to see some much bigger numbers from the regular SLs
-
07-17-2009, 11:09 AM #5
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Germany / Gießen
- Age
- 24
- Posts
- 1,413
Re: Statistics Series: Hours SL+CO/SM
Squad-Member 208:41:22
Squad-Leader 205:49:12
Commander 03:20:20
(205,5+3,2)/208,4 = 1,0009592326139088729016786570743Last edited by black_Mirror; 07-17-2009 at 11:38 AM.
His capacity for love lost, the man accepts it into his glas of dispair. The Flames of burning anger unquenched, the man keeps drinking... but never gets drunk
-
07-17-2009, 11:20 AM #6
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Posts
- 2,344
Re: Statistics Series: Hours SL+CO/SM
please do NOT include lone wolf in your statistics.
Also, remember the result is not a percent. The highest people will likely have quite a bit more than a 1.0 number
-
07-17-2009, 11:22 AM #7
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Posts
- 2,344
Re: Statistics Series: Hours SL+CO/SM
SL: 148
CO: 33
SM: 212
Result: 0.85
-
07-17-2009, 12:24 PM #8
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Canada
- Age
- 30
- Posts
- 1,516
Re: Statistics Series: Hours SL+CO/SM
SL: 138
CO: 9
SM: 162
Result: 0.90
-
07-17-2009, 12:32 PM #9
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Kingswinford, West Midlands, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
- Posts
- 189
- Blog Entries
- 4
Re: Statistics Series: Hours SL+CO/SM
SM: 90
SL: 18
CO: 8
total: 0.28|TG-18th|BloodDrops2094
KFC the best thing to hit BF2142 since my soldier got thin from running
Le Mans 24 hour race attendee - 2010
-
07-17-2009, 12:36 PM #10
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- London
- Age
- 30
- Posts
- 2,243
Re: Statistics Series: Hours SL+CO/SM
0.94
BF3 Soldier: DrSparky
"Cum bellum clamavit, respondivi"
-
07-17-2009, 12:50 PM #11
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Toronto
- Age
- 34
- Posts
- 2,876
Re: Statistics Series: Hours SL+CO/SM
SL: 464
CO: 11
SM: 700
Result: 0.7
-
07-17-2009, 12:58 PM #12
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Wherever my gallbladder isn't
- Age
- 23
- Posts
- 4,778
Re: Statistics Series: Hours SL+CO/SM
Please also note that if you bother to convert the minutes in your playtime into a decimal make sure that you do it correctly.
120:50:34 does not equal 120.5 hours
50/60 = .83 therefore 120:50 = 120.83
120.5 = 120:30 (30/60 = .5)Reapator, overlord of ponies
-
07-17-2009, 12:59 PM #13
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Toronto
- Posts
- 18
Re: Statistics Series: Hours SL+CO/SM
SM: 416
SL: 13
CO: 0
13/416 = 0.03
Is there some sort of inverse award?
-
07-17-2009, 01:07 PM #14
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Age
- 22
- Posts
- 2,436
Re: Statistics Series: Hours SL+CO/SM
SL: 46.6
CO: 13.62
SM: 399.38
60.22/399.38 = 0.15
Yes I need to step up to the plate more often
-
07-17-2009, 01:08 PM #15
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- London, UK
- Posts
- 133
Re: Statistics Series: Hours SL+CO/SM
sm 78
sl 163
co 4
167/78 = 2.14
just look at CruxAustralis for winner (EDIT, his a wee bit over 10)|TG-SC|Flik.
Reply With Quote
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Bookmarks