Battlefield 2142 Server Evaluation - Page 2

**Apophis** · 10-27-2006, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vice

Miami Server:

No lag what so ever, ping was in mid 30's.
Server population was only me.

Dallas Server:

Lag was present but due to the movement of Titans.
Rubber banding was there but it was minimal, game is fully playable.
Ping was in mid 50's.

Both seemed fine to me, except the usual Titan lag.

LOL, playing with yourself doesn't count!

**Xeil** · 10-27-2006, 10:10 PM

Miami Server:

Server was full 64/64 and the lag was really bad. My ping was around 90, but people were warping around like mad.I heard other people complaining about warping around too.

Dallas Server:

Server was full 48/48 and there was only lag when the titans move. Of course every server I've played on there was lag when they are going.
So this server seems the better of two.

Wolf server? 64.34.161.22

No lag what so ever with the server being full 64/64 on conquest. I think this is probably the best out of all of them if you want my opinion.

**Apophis** · 10-27-2006, 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xeil

Miami Server:

Server was full 64/64 and the lag was really bad. My ping was around 90, but people were warping around like mad.I heard other people complaining about warping around too.

Dallas Server:

Server was full 48/48 and there was only lag when the titans move. Of course every server I've played on there was lag when they are going.
So this server seems the better of two.

Wolf server? 64.34.161.22

No lag what so ever with the server being full 64/64 on conquest. I think this is probably the best out of all of them if you want my opinion.

Excellent. I played a few rounds on the Wolf server tonight with no issues at all. I was unable to get any time in on Dallas, but it looked good from this end.

Lord_Jebez · 10-28-2006, 12:00 AM

Let me correct you. My server was located in MIAMI. The IP address was 204.13.5.8. Your MIAMI server is 204.13.5.something.

Also, let me correct you on something else. The lag was on HYPERNIA's server. Not B&D. Neither myself or my clan had a damn thing to do with the lag. The issue was entirely Hypernia's. I sent many support request to have the issue looked at. The only tech at Hypernia that gave me more than a worthless, flippent comment was a gentleman with the name Jelle. The best the other tech would tell me was to reduce the number of players on the server. After that, nothing. Hypernia's customer support sucked backside hard. Charlie is a good man. He was always respectful. But, he's a sales agent as far as I know. I would suggest to him that he start looking for a new job as Hypernia is getting a very sorry reputation in other forums.

My suggestion to TG is to stick with Wolfservers. IMHO

Lorian · 10-28-2006, 04:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord_Jebez

Also, let me correct you on something else. The lag was on HYPERNIA's server. Not B&D. Neither myself or my clan had a damn thing to do with the lag.

I don't think anyone was blaming you for it...

**Apophis** · 10-28-2006, 08:28 AM

Lets get this thread back on track. I'm ONLY looking for performance reports here.

BHack · 10-28-2006, 12:01 PM

Miami was unplayable. Exact same issue that plagued the B&D server. That datacenter apparently sucks.

I played on Dallas without incident - can't tell you if the server was full though.

I have had no problems so far at all with the virginia server.

=Sarc= · 10-28-2006, 12:13 PM

Something else to note: The Miami server is the only one currently deserted. The other two servers are packed. I was on the Dallas server and everything was smooth.

**Dick Blonov** · 10-28-2006, 12:55 PM

Played a few rounds last night (27-10) on 64.34.161.22. Server was full, no lag whatsoever.
DB

=Sarc= · 10-28-2006, 09:53 PM

Something odd happened with the Dallas server tonight at around 8:30 EST. It seemed like the server crashed two rounds in a row. There were people on as soon as I got back on and it was running the same map. The server was full the first time before the crash. Then the second time it was about 30/48. The player count dropped to 10/48 after all the disconnects.

perry · 10-28-2006, 11:06 PM

I played on Dallas and Virginia quite a bit today. Neither had any lag to speak of, and both crashed about the same amount of times.

Telorn · 10-29-2006, 09:34 PM

Virginia server started lagging tonight at around 8-8:30 ET. Pings were in 30s but I was starting to get occasional rubber-banding which prevented me from killing the enemy

Nothing drastic to utterly kill gameplay. Maybe server code is bad at managing resources? It seemed to occur after playing for a while without the server crashing.

**Apophis** · 10-30-2006, 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Telorn

Virginia server started lagging tonight at around 8-8:30 ET. Pings were in 30s but I was starting to get occasional rubber-banding which prevented me from killing the enemy

Nothing drastic to utterly kill gameplay. Maybe server code is bad at managing resources? It seemed to occur after playing for a while without the server crashing.

Did anyone else have these same issues on Virginia last night? Or was it isolated to just Telorn?

BHack · 10-30-2006, 09:07 AM

I've also seen virginia cough. It's not as bad as the other servers, but it does happen at max capacity.

I think BF2142 just requires so much data that, unless you have a ridiculously overpowered setup, it's going to choke under full load.

Red · 10-30-2006, 09:43 AM

I played mostly on Tactical Gamer Server B, and had no issue with lag. Not sure which one this is.

10-27-2006, 10:10 PM	#17 (permalink)
Xeil Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Albuquerque, NM Age: 23 Posts: 220	Re: Battlefield 2142 Server Evaluation Miami Server: Server was full 64/64 and the lag was really bad. My ping was around 90, but people were warping around like mad.I heard other people complaining about warping around too. Dallas Server: Server was full 48/48 and there was only lag when the titans move. Of course every server I've played on there was lag when they are going. So this server seems the better of two. Wolf server? 64.34.161.22 No lag what so ever with the server being full 64/64 on conquest. I think this is probably the best out of all of them if you want my opinion. __________________

10-28-2006, 12:00 AM	#19 (permalink)
Lord_Jebez Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Southern Coast of Maine Posts: 28	Re: Battlefield 2142 Server Evaluation Let me correct you. My server was located in MIAMI. The IP address was 204.13.5.8. Your MIAMI server is 204.13.5.something. Also, let me correct you on something else. The lag was on HYPERNIA's server. Not B&D. Neither myself or my clan had a damn thing to do with the lag. The issue was entirely Hypernia's. I sent many support request to have the issue looked at. The only tech at Hypernia that gave me more than a worthless, flippent comment was a gentleman with the name Jelle. The best the other tech would tell me was to reduce the number of players on the server. After that, nothing. Hypernia's customer support sucked backside hard. Charlie is a good man. He was always respectful. But, he's a sales agent as far as I know. I would suggest to him that he start looking for a new job as Hypernia is getting a very sorry reputation in other forums. My suggestion to TG is to stick with Wolfservers. IMHO __________________ "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." George Orwell

10-28-2006, 08:28 AM	#21 (permalink)
Apophis Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Rhode Island, USA Age: 36 Posts: 8,991	Re: Battlefield 2142 Server Evaluation Lets get this thread back on track. I'm ONLY looking for performance reports here. __________________ Diplomacy is the art of saying "good doggie" while looking for a bigger stick.

10-28-2006, 12:01 PM	#22 (permalink)
BHack Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Orlando, FL Age: 27 Posts: 1,636	Re: Battlefield 2142 Server Evaluation Miami was unplayable. Exact same issue that plagued the B&D server. That datacenter apparently sucks. I played on Dallas without incident - can't tell you if the server was full though. I have had no problems so far at all with the virginia server. __________________

10-28-2006, 12:13 PM	#23 (permalink)
=Sarc= Join Date: May 2003 Location: Ottawa, Canada Posts: 4,625	Re: Battlefield 2142 Server Evaluation Something else to note: The Miami server is the only one currently deserted. The other two servers are packed. I was on the Dallas server and everything was smooth. __________________ JO Guides & Tutorials Team Element - It's who you game with.

10-28-2006, 12:55 PM	#24 (permalink)
Dick Blonov Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: In a Vortex! Age: 51 Posts: 3,398	Re: Battlefield 2142 Server Evaluation Played a few rounds last night (27-10) on 64.34.161.22. Server was full, no lag whatsoever. DB __________________ \|TG-6th\|Blonov «Any situation that involves the line "I was ran over by a dumptruck..." can't be good.» eGoatBoy BattleField2 SOPs \| Teamspeak \| Server Rules and SOPs \| The 6th Devil's Brigade

10-28-2006, 09:53 PM	#25 (permalink)
=Sarc= Join Date: May 2003 Location: Ottawa, Canada Posts: 4,625	Re: Battlefield 2142 Server Evaluation Something odd happened with the Dallas server tonight at around 8:30 EST. It seemed like the server crashed two rounds in a row. There were people on as soon as I got back on and it was running the same map. The server was full the first time before the crash. Then the second time it was about 30/48. The player count dropped to 10/48 after all the disconnects. __________________ JO Guides & Tutorials Team Element - It's who you game with.

10-28-2006, 11:06 PM	#26 (permalink)
perry Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 4,494	Re: Battlefield 2142 Server Evaluation I played on Dallas and Virginia quite a bit today. Neither had any lag to speak of, and both crashed about the same amount of times. __________________ Battlefield Admin(BF2 Rules) (BF2142 Rules) [volun2][medic][defense3][eng2][support] [sg-c1][gchq-c1][tog-c1][ma-c1][taw-c1][tg-c2] Support TG \| Write for TacticalWiki \| BF2 Sig. Generator \| TS Help

10-29-2006, 09:34 PM	#27 (permalink)
Telorn Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Georgia Age: 27 Posts: 2,187	Re: Battlefield 2142 Server Evaluation Virginia server started lagging tonight at around 8-8:30 ET. Pings were in 30s but I was starting to get occasional rubber-banding which prevented me from killing the enemy Nothing drastic to utterly kill gameplay. Maybe server code is bad at managing resources? It seemed to occur after playing for a while without the server crashing. __________________ Telorn

10-30-2006, 09:07 AM	#29 (permalink)
BHack Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Orlando, FL Age: 27 Posts: 1,636	Re: Battlefield 2142 Server Evaluation I've also seen virginia cough. It's not as bad as the other servers, but it does happen at max capacity. I think BF2142 just requires so much data that, unless you have a ridiculously overpowered setup, it's going to choke under full load. __________________

10-30-2006, 09:43 AM	#30 (permalink)
Red Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Chicago Age: 34 Posts: 821	Re: Battlefield 2142 Server Evaluation I played mostly on Tactical Gamer Server B, and had no issue with lag. Not sure which one this is.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Battlefield 2142 Server Live!	Apophis	Tactical Gamer News Items	1	10-19-2006 02:52 AM
It's OUT!	Magnum50	America's Army - General Discussion	19	09-17-2006 09:52 PM
E3 06: Battlefield 2142 Hands-On	UnDeaD77	Battlefield 2142 - General Discussion	19	05-16-2006 04:57 PM
Battlefield 2 Servers Updated to 1.3	Apophis	Tactical Gamer News Items	11	10-26-2005 11:00 PM

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links