Welcome to Tactical Gamer

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13
Discussion: Battlefield 2142 / Battlefield 2142 - General Discussion - The Reduced Player Count - Impression - Though I start an impression thread on the lowered player count. Personally I really like
  1. #1
    Red
    Red is offline

    Red's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Chicago
    Age
    37
    Posts
    849

    The Reduced Player Count - Impression

    Though I start an impression thread on the lowered player count.

    Personally I really like the maps with less players, specially the maps that was design for 32 player infantry battles. Also feel that TG is playing a bigger role in the matches on both sides.

    Now the next step, lets mix in a titan map every 3 maps or so.

  2.  
  3. #2

    TheFatKidDeath's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Santa Monica, CA
    Posts
    2,984

    Smile Re: The Reduced Player Count - Impression

    I'd agree with all of the above. The change is great.

    I would also like to see some Titan rounds rotated in if that is possible.
    |TG-9th| TheFatKidDeath
    "Born to Party, Forced to Work."
    http://www.theonion.com/content/node/55640 - Check me out on The Onion
    http://www.theonion.com/content/vide...ssfully_avoids - I'm on the local news!

  4.  
  5. #3

    Exploding_Silver's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Euroland
    Posts
    7,251
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: The Reduced Player Count - Impression

    Conquest and titan modes cannot be mixed, it requires manual intervention to change the map list and restart the server (which would disconnect everyone). So although a popular idea to mix modes, its a no-go.

    I prefer 50 players, it seems to aid a more organised feel on the server, squads have some space to get their act together.

  6.  

     
  7. #4

    Barracuda_Magoo's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Michigan
    Age
    26
    Posts
    393

    Re: The Reduced Player Count - Impression

    I've been on other servers that mixed game types. I think..... O_O


  8.  
  9. #5


    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,492

    Re: The Reduced Player Count - Impression

    I think that it is possible to mix game modes, it's just quite buggy.. like most things with our admin tool. The simpler we keep things, the better luck we have.
    Battlefield Admin(BF2 Rules) (BF2142 Rules)
    [volun2][medic][defense3][eng2][support]
    [sg-c1][gchq-c1][tog-c1][ma-c1][taw-c1][tg-c2]
    Support TG | Write for TacticalWiki | BF2 Sig. Generator | TS Help

  10.  
  11. #6

    Maus's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    330

    Re: The Reduced Player Count - Impression

    Yep, those servers are certainly out there. Not played on them much (I bail when Titan comes on) so I can't comment on stability.
    2142: |TG-Irr| Silverfish
    BF2: |TG-Irr| Maus



  12.  

     
  13. #7


    Acreo Aeneas's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    DePaul University (Chicago)
    Age
    26
    Posts
    8,205
    Blog Entries
    19

    Re: The Reduced Player Count - Impression

    Well if it crashes the server, then it should be a no-go. I don't think players want to reconnect everytime the server has to restart inorder to change gamemode.

    And the 50 player count is good indeed. It still retains a good number to have larger battles but low enough where the squads formed can work as squads.
    Acreo Aeneas
    Content Development Team
    Technology Relations Manager



    Former 9th IHS Member. Long live the mobile infantry!
    Novice Audiophile, Technology Enthusiast

    "Arrrrgh! This waiting for BF3's beta is driving me up a wall!" - Acreo Aeneas

  14.  
  15. #8

    =Sarc='s Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    4,862

    Re: The Reduced Player Count - Impression

    It would be nice to mix in titan but I think it's better to keep the game types separate. Too many players are staying away from titan and 2 more players would be dropped to accomodate titans 48 player max from conquest's current 50.

    If we want some titan mixed in, we should seed the titan server. Although, we may have to wait until TG has a larger player base and 2142's next patch before trying to populate a titan server regularly.
    JO Guides & Tutorials
    Team Element - It's who you game with.

  16.  
  17. #9

    BHack's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Age
    30
    Posts
    1,632

    Re: The Reduced Player Count - Impression

    Check out the ARMORY servers. It runs 3 conquest then one Titan map without any issues at all. It works really well and is a nice change of pace.

    The lowered player count in the TG server has helped a ton. It reduced the server lag and playing 50 people on 32 player maps is much better than 64 on 64. I always thought the maps were too big for even their maximum allowed players.

  18.  

     
  19. #10

    Telorn's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Georgia
    Age
    31
    Posts
    2,195

    Re: The Reduced Player Count - Impression

    I too enjoy the 48 player max (48 now since the reserve slot script, right?). And the 32 player vehicle maps are much better.

    Once Titan/admin tools are stable I wouldn't mind seeing a Titan mode mixed in every 3 maps or so on the vehicle maps. I don't know if this would be possible with the reserve slot script additional player count 'buffer' though.
    Last edited by Telorn; 11-21-2006 at 10:55 AM.
    Telorn

  20.  
  21. #11

    BHack's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Age
    30
    Posts
    1,632

    Re: The Reduced Player Count - Impression

    My impression of the 48 player limit on Titan maps was that it wasn't hard coded, just not supported. I think we'd be ok.

  22.  
  23. #12


    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    6

    Re: The Reduced Player Count - Impression

    I would have to agree the 50 player max is a nice number for most maps. Much less congestion and lagg than when it was 64 players.

    The only issue I see now, and please don't take this as complaining, is that the conquest mode server is almost always full and when I do get in I am usually kicked in an hour or so. On several occasions I have seen the titan mode server with 10 or less people in it during peak times. Has there been any thought about making the titan mode server a conquest mode server and possibly have certain days set aside each week for titan play?

    v/r

    Red Herring

  24.  

     
  25. #13

    WhiskeySix's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    13,482
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: The Reduced Player Count - Impression

    Quote Originally Posted by RedHerring View Post
    ....the conquest mode server is almost always full and when I do get in I am usually kicked in an hour or so. On several occasions I have seen the titan mode server with 10 or less people in it during peak times....
    hmm.. is there anyway to refer blocked/SM-kicked players to our Titan server? Possible to add a few more words to the "you've been kicked" popup?

    |TG-12th|WhiskeySix

  26.  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


  
 

Back to top