Welcome to Tactical Gamer

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
Discussion: Battlefield 2142 / Battlefield 2142 - General Discussion - Why No 64 Player Server? - HI. I've been wondering as of late, why isn't there a 64 player server for
  1. #1

    HatefullSix's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Niagara, Ontario, Canada
    Age
    35
    Posts
    148

    Why No 64 Player Server?

    HI. I've been wondering as of late, why isn't there a 64 player server for BF2142 conquest? I did a (brief) search of the forums and couldn't find an answer. It seems to me that on most days the 50 player server is always full, so a bump up to 64 might be a good thing (bigger maps, more pubbies to shoot).

    Anyway, just thought I'd see if there was a reason why.
    |TG-Irr|HatefullSix

    If at first you don't succeed, you need more firepower.

    There is nothing wrong with feeling something when you shoot your enemies... as long as that something is recoil.


  2.  
  3. #2

    DirtyLude's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    715

    Re: Why No 64 Player Server?

    I'm not certain what they were thinking on these maps. Armor maps are too big and infantry maps are too small.
    The Dirty

  4.  
  5. #3

    HatefullSix's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Niagara, Ontario, Canada
    Age
    35
    Posts
    148

    Talking Re: Why No 64 Player Server?

    Thanks. Question answered. I never knew 64 p could be such a problem. I haven't had much experience playing on them, as I'm mostly here on the 50p server.
    |TG-Irr|HatefullSix

    If at first you don't succeed, you need more firepower.

    There is nothing wrong with feeling something when you shoot your enemies... as long as that something is recoil.


  6.  

     
  7. #4

    DrJOnes666's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    217

    Re: Why No 64 Player Server?

    This is why I love TG so much (and always give my yearly contribution- shameless plug to invite others to do the same!): TG adjusts to make the best gameplay possible. Reducing to 50 players in 2142 was one of the best moves.
    |TG|drjones666

  8.  
  9. #5

    Tarenth's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,211

    Re: Why No 64 Player Server?

    I always wondered why we use the 32 player version of some maps and the 62 version of others.

    Some examples we use more than and more than
    My sanity is not in question...
    It was a confirmed casualty some time ago.


    Light, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to hide the bodies of the people I had to kill because they ticked me off.




  10.  
  11. #6

    Zoraster's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    2,344

    Re: Why No 64 Player Server?

    the 64 player maps use a lot more armor, and i think that in general, our server enjoys infantry play a bit more. maybe i'm just saying that because *I* like infantry maps more.

    The truth is that the maps where they've made 64p versions, we're already struggling with how big the maps are in the 32p version. If they made a 64p version of Gibraltar or Berlin or even Belgrade, it'd probably do more good than adding some more points in sidi which already feels like a huge map.

  12.  

     
  13. #7

    Revark's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Age
    36
    Posts
    997

    Re: Why No 64 Player Server?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zoraster View Post
    the 64 player maps use a lot more armor, and i think that in general, our server enjoys infantry play a bit more. maybe i'm just saying that because *I* like infantry maps more.

    The truth is that the maps where they've made 64p versions, we're already struggling with how big the maps are in the 32p version. If they made a 64p version of Gibraltar or Berlin or even Belgrade, it'd probably do more good than adding some more points in sidi which already feels like a huge map.
    Odd, I spent many of my early 2142 hours on a 64 Sidi map. I actually like the dimension those 2 side bases add. Helps with flanking the 3 center bases. *shrug*


    p.s. I am your man for SLing and COing the Sidi map. *blush*

    64 Side map, note 2 extra bases.
    Battlefield 2: Battlefield 2142: WoW: Oblivion: NWN2

  14.  
  15. #8

    Tarenth's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,211

    Re: Why No 64 Player Server?

    It actually encourages more armor to go down that little used side route instead of straight down the road to the first central position. From there you can then spring board a flanking assault onto your opponent's central position and attempt to cut their motor lanes away.

    I've learned that if a TG squad can take and hold a point along the opponent's motor lanes they can effectively turn the tide of battle for you. This is because they will cripple or remove the enemy tanks and vehicles from the field as they pass while yours can dominate the field.
    My sanity is not in question...
    It was a confirmed casualty some time ago.


    Light, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to hide the bodies of the people I had to kill because they ticked me off.




  16.  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


  
 

Back to top