2142 Gentleman's Agreement - Page 6

Tsuoz250rdrK · 05-05-2007, 08:29 PM

signed

**INSUNABULA** · 05-12-2007, 03:24 PM

Signed (with the Brass add-on) and Amen.

I still don't like the idea of entering the other teams base and stealing/destroying their vehicles though - sure you can bomb-up the radar as a "special ops" play, but as far as the vehicles go they should remain the other team's property until they are driven out of the compound - if they abandon the vehicle after that then sure, it's anyones.

It's all about common sense and fair-play which is what makes this server the envy of others.

Icefoxen · 05-12-2007, 05:13 PM

Signed, with Brass' addendum about spawn beacons, that is. Sometimes it is hard to find where it is, and I've encountered times where I lack the weaponry to properly destroy one. I do say that if I find it and can properly destroy it, I will. Though I'd note that given that the beacon has a valid in-character reason for working how it does, rather than "magical" appearing, I would argue that it is indeed REALISTIC tactics to suppress one. It may not be accurate to current rl warfare (but we don't have orbital drop beacons, now do we?

), but it sure is accurate to this setting's warfare - they're podding in, not just appearing magically via a limitation in the game engine. Plus, the pod-in when used correctly can give them an idea of what they'll face when they hit the ground, so it partially negates the entire argument that the enemy is at an unfair disadvantage without situational awareness. Still, if I find it and can destroy it, I will; if I can't, I'll guard it and eliminate any enemies podding in until someone gets there who can. That is my duty as a soldier, and in this futuristic world, it would be a realistic and approved tactic of any military to do this to beacons as well.

This is my reasoning behind agreeing with Brass' addendum regarding spawn beacons, and my own view on things. So with this single reservation, I sign.

PS: And thanks for bringing this over here Penguineer, and thanks to the individuals who wrote this up originally. Very nice post, good read, and I'm glad to sign.

etancross · 05-13-2007, 03:47 PM

signed...

Kmart-Security

DLBlue · 06-25-2007, 08:42 AM

Signed

D0ubl3Hel1x · 06-25-2007, 09:10 AM

/signed

Imperator · 06-25-2007, 10:27 AM

Signed.

**LordMeatwad** · 06-25-2007, 05:00 PM

signed

cloudz0rs · 06-25-2007, 05:16 PM

Signed... but "3. Taking advantage of a spawner's disorientation. While it may put you at a disadvantage, give the spawner time to get a handle on their surrounding before you shoot at them, such as giving them time to run a certain distance."
o.o That rule makes me cry, but that doesn't mean that I could "forget" sometimes ;D

**Chiefmedicman** · 06-25-2007, 07:54 PM

I hereby sign this document and agree to fulfill the above criteria.

**P.Drona** · 06-26-2007, 02:32 AM

I'm in

moxmax · 06-26-2007, 02:47 AM

Signed and passed on!

JamesTerror · 06-26-2007, 05:28 AM

Signed

**spiff913** · 06-26-2007, 09:16 AM

Signed.

Syrum · 06-29-2007, 02:40 AM

05-05-2007, 08:29 PM	#76 (permalink)
Tsuoz250rdrK Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: NJ Posts: 214	Re: 2142 Gentleman's Agreement signed __________________

05-12-2007, 03:24 PM	#77 (permalink)
INSUNABULA Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Toronto Age: 30 Posts: 1,565	Re: 2142 Gentleman's Agreement Signed (with the Brass add-on) and Amen. I still don't like the idea of entering the other teams base and stealing/destroying their vehicles though - sure you can bomb-up the radar as a "special ops" play, but as far as the vehicles go they should remain the other team's property until they are driven out of the compound - if they abandon the vehicle after that then sure, it's anyones. It's all about common sense and fair-play which is what makes this server the envy of others.

05-12-2007, 05:13 PM	#78 (permalink)
Icefoxen Join Date: May 2007 Location: USA Age: 23 Posts: 214	Re: 2142 Gentleman's Agreement Signed, with Brass' addendum about spawn beacons, that is. Sometimes it is hard to find where it is, and I've encountered times where I lack the weaponry to properly destroy one. I do say that if I find it and can properly destroy it, I will. Though I'd note that given that the beacon has a valid in-character reason for working how it does, rather than "magical" appearing, I would argue that it is indeed REALISTIC tactics to suppress one. It may not be accurate to current rl warfare (but we don't have orbital drop beacons, now do we? ), but it sure is accurate to this setting's warfare - they're podding in, not just appearing magically via a limitation in the game engine. Plus, the pod-in when used correctly can give them an idea of what they'll face when they hit the ground, so it partially negates the entire argument that the enemy is at an unfair disadvantage without situational awareness. Still, if I find it and can destroy it, I will; if I can't, I'll guard it and eliminate any enemies podding in until someone gets there who can. That is my duty as a soldier, and in this futuristic world, it would be a realistic and approved tactic of any military to do this to beacons as well. This is my reasoning behind agreeing with Brass' addendum regarding spawn beacons, and my own view on things. So with this single reservation, I sign. PS: And thanks for bringing this over here Penguineer, and thanks to the individuals who wrote this up originally. Very nice post, good read, and I'm glad to sign.

05-13-2007, 03:47 PM	#79 (permalink)
etancross Registered User Join Date: May 2007 Location: Richmond, Va Posts: 5	Re: 2142 Gentleman's Agreement signed... Kmart-Security

06-25-2007, 08:42 AM	#80 (permalink)
DLBlue Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 232	Re: 2142 Gentleman's Agreement Signed

06-25-2007, 09:10 AM	#81 (permalink)
D0ubl3Hel1x Join Date: Jun 2007 Age: 31 Posts: 528	Re: 2142 Gentleman's Agreement /signed __________________

06-25-2007, 10:27 AM	#82 (permalink)
Imperator Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Michigan, USA Age: 23 Posts: 47	Re: 2142 Gentleman's Agreement Signed. __________________

06-25-2007, 05:00 PM	#83 (permalink)
LordMeatwad Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: New Jersey Age: 27 Posts: 653	Re: 2142 Gentleman's Agreement signed __________________ \|TG-21\| LordMeatwad XBOX live = TG Lordmeatwad ACE Online = Lordmeatwad on Prelude B.C.U FREE GAME CLICK HERE New to TG? Start here - Ribbon Nominations! - Become a Supporting Member 21st Tactical Wiki - TG Admins Shoot first! Q-spot second!

06-25-2007, 05:16 PM	#84 (permalink)
cloudz0rs Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 54	Re: 2142 Gentleman's Agreement Signed... but "3. Taking advantage of a spawner's disorientation. While it may put you at a disadvantage, give the spawner time to get a handle on their surrounding before you shoot at them, such as giving them time to run a certain distance." o.o That rule makes me cry, but that doesn't mean that I could "forget" sometimes ;D __________________ \|TG-Irr\|cloudz0rs =) <3 Norah Jones! on COD4!

06-25-2007, 07:54 PM	#85 (permalink)
Chiefmedicman Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 208	Re: 2142 Gentleman's Agreement I hereby sign this document and agree to fulfill the above criteria. __________________ New to TG? Start here - 21st TCIU Tactical Wiki

06-26-2007, 02:32 AM	#86 (permalink)
P.Drona Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,245	Re: 2142 Gentleman's Agreement I'm in __________________ *Call of Duty admin - Contact me* * *Official CoD4 Server Rules* *Need to Report a Player or Have Been Banned From our Servers ?* Ribbons! * *13th Special Ops Group Wiki*

06-26-2007, 02:47 AM	#87 (permalink)
moxmax Banned Join Date: Jan 2007 Age: 29 Posts: 331	Re: 2142 Gentleman's Agreement Signed and passed on!

06-26-2007, 05:28 AM	#88 (permalink)
JamesTerror Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 293	Re: 2142 Gentleman's Agreement Signed __________________ \|TG-Irr\|JamesTerror Cheese in my ears and Donuts around my fingers

06-26-2007, 09:16 AM	#89 (permalink)
spiff913 Join Date: May 2007 Location: Plummeting toward planet Zog Posts: 419	Re: 2142 Gentleman's Agreement Signed.

06-29-2007, 02:40 AM	#90 (permalink)
Syrum Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1	Re: 2142 Gentleman's Agreement X.

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)