Welcome to Tactical Gamer

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 8 12345678 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 118
Discussion: Battlefield 2142 / Battlefield 2142 - General Discussion - TG Servers and Northern Strike - Have the Admins come to a decision on whether or not we will run NS
  1. #1


    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Keller, TX
    Posts
    61

    TG Servers and Northern Strike

    Have the Admins come to a decision on whether or not we will run NS maps? It still seems like the second server doesn't get a whole lot of people even with the new city map rotation. Perhaps we can convert the second server to a NS Assault lines / Titan server to generate a little interest for it during the initial NS excitement?

    The Titan is suppose to have improvements that will make it easier on lower end systems, if that is a concern.

  2.  
  3. #2


    Tempus's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Age
    41
    Posts
    8,684

    Re: TG Servers and NS

    We will likely be hosting the booster maps full-time of the second server to start out with.



    -- Suits are what you wear when doing things you shouldn’t want to do anyway.

    FROM THE TACTICAL GAMER PRIMER.
    3) Support game play in a near-simulation environment. Where the focus of play would not be solely on doing what it takes to win, but doing so utilizing real-world combat strategy and tactics rather than leveraging exploits provided to players by the design of the game engine.

  4.  
  5. #3

    BleedingKnee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Age
    38
    Posts
    1,274

    Re: TG Servers and NS

    I am excited about playing NS with TG. However, I get a bad ping to the Texas server which is hosting the city maps now. Plus, I was under the impression that I was not the only one. During the recent scrim, I was frequently checking the players' pings, and they appeared awfully high compared to our Virginia server.

    I worry that the fact that NS will go onto the Texas server will discourage people from playing.

    Forgive me for sounding selfish, but why not switch the Texas server over to another east coast server? Are the majority of supporting members not on the east coast?

    Life is uncertain. Ride your best horse first.

  6.  

     
  7. #4
    Zid
    Zid is offline

    Zid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Syracuse, New York, United States
    Age
    23
    Posts
    644

    Re: TG Servers and NS

    Quote Originally Posted by MDawg77 View Post
    Have the Admins come to a decision on whether or not we will run NS maps? It still seems like the second server doesn't get a whole lot of people even with the new city map rotation. Perhaps we can convert the second server to a NS Assault lines / Titan server to generate a little interest for it during the initial NS excitement?

    The Titan is suppose to have improvements that will make it easier on lower end systems, if that is a concern.
    awful idea. put the new booster maps that everyone doesn't have and titan that no one really likes on the same server that also has freakishly high pings? sounds like murder.
    Current member of the

  8.  
  9. #5

    Zoraster's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    2,344

    Re: TG Servers and NS

    using the second server is the death knell for NS. I'll bet it's dead in two months. 2 weeks might even be a stretch for it.

  10.  
  11. #6

    Sir_Brass's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Arizona
    Age
    28
    Posts
    604

    Re: TG Servers and NS

    So....use the main server!
    |TG-Irr|Hiram_Yorik
    Games: GRAW, BF2142, Oblivion, FarCry, Empire At War, R6:RVS, KotOR, KotOR2, MW4: Mercs, FEAR (XP)




    *Hiss* "Oh...crap!" *BLAM* "I'm down....MEDIC!!"

    DirtyLude: "If we kill him and eat his heart, his magic will be ours."

  12.  

     
  13. #7


    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Keller, TX
    Posts
    61

    Re: TG Servers and NS

    I updated my profile, now you can see why I am excited about having it on the Texas server. I played in the beta, and I can tell you the new maps and toys are very fun (I don't think that comment violates the NDA).

  14.  
  15. #8

    Zoraster's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    2,344

    Re: TG Servers and NS

    ah keller! i'm from Dallas. i used to wrestle Keller high school.

  16.  
  17. #9

    Pokerface's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    MD, USA
    Age
    33
    Posts
    5,914

    Re: TG Servers and NS

    I hereby petition for a new abbreviation for this 2142 Mod. :P

    NS Game Officer. TF2 Admin. BF2 Admin / Scripter. PM with issues.
    Tempus: Pokerface is nailing it right on the head. Everyone who is arguing against him is simply arguing against reality.
    <anmuzi> it is not permitted to have privacy or anonymity
    <LazyEye> yeah when I play on TG the server digs though my trash

    Arm yourself with knowledge: TG NS TF2 BF2

  18.  

     
  19. #10

    Snail88's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Hamilton, NJ
    Age
    30
    Posts
    2,049

    Re: TG Servers and NS

    lol poker...

    yea, i think its either main server or nothing. See, the problem is, is that everyone wants to play with everyone. With a lot of SM's that can kick people off the server to make room for them to play with everyone, theres little need for a second server. As a SM, you see empty server and you see full server you can still join....which are you gonna join? NS can be incorporated in with vanilla. If you put it on a different server, hardly anyone will play on it.

    So, imo, its either all or none. But like i said in another post, if we do decide to go for it, im sure most will pick it up so they can play with everyone here.



    Quote Originally Posted by Fehmart View Post
    well, like I tell my squads sometimes, some rounds are just "grab your ankles".

  20.  
  21. #11

    Zoraster's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    2,344

    Re: TG Servers and NS

    exactly what snail said. All or nothing.

  22.  
  23. #12

    Hambergler's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    HTX
    Age
    37
    Posts
    1,708

    Re: TG Servers and NS

    If there is a way to avoid all the problems we had with the boosters in BF2, I would be for putting them on the main server.

  24.  

     
  25. #13


    Tempus's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Age
    41
    Posts
    8,684

    Re: TG Servers and NS

    The problem with the boosters in BF2 was the very fact that not everyone had them. So, say you are a TG member, and you don't like the boosters or don't want to buy them, and you're happily playing on the main server and a booster map comes up. Well, then you are SOL, you will have to wait until a regular map comes back up.

    The difference here is that as a ranked 2142 server, there are far more opportunities for pubbies to help fill a 2nd server. So, for those who want to play boosters, there will be a server just for you. For those who do not, there is a server just for you too.

    Of course, this is largely dependent upon the performance of this server and how well the boosters end up being received by the community.



    -- Suits are what you wear when doing things you shouldn’t want to do anyway.

    FROM THE TACTICAL GAMER PRIMER.
    3) Support game play in a near-simulation environment. Where the focus of play would not be solely on doing what it takes to win, but doing so utilizing real-world combat strategy and tactics rather than leveraging exploits provided to players by the design of the game engine.

  26.  
  27. #14

    Zoraster's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    2,344

    Re: TG Servers and NS

    well. i've made my case that a second server will never be successful in the long run. I think if we split it like this, we'll have about 2 to 3 weeks of a semifilled second server and then everyone will just come back to the main server and lament that EA got it wrong.

    while i understand that some people will not want to buy NS on TG, they're probably the people who aren't playing bf2142 much anyway. While it's not great to lose them, I think it's far better to improve our main server. I think if we make our main server an NS server that most people will shell out the 10 bucks to buy the booster.

    I really don't believe that "one for you and one for you" is going to work. We here at TG want to play together and play with as many other TGers as possible. We'll all gravitate toward the same server no matter whether you make the second on mixed, titan, booster, city mapped, or whatever.

    So, as snail said. All or nothing.

  28.  
  29. #15

    Snail88's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Hamilton, NJ
    Age
    30
    Posts
    2,049

    Re: TG Servers and NS

    exactly...im all for seeing how 2 servers goes but as past experiences go, zoraster said it best. People gravitate toward one server where the most people are playing, whatever the flavor it is.



    Quote Originally Posted by Fehmart View Post
    well, like I tell my squads sometimes, some rounds are just "grab your ankles".

  30.  

     

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


  
 

Back to top