View Poll Results: Should we merge NS and Vanilla 2142 maps on server #1?
- Voters
- 62. You may not vote on this poll
-
Yes
41 66.13% -
No
21 33.87%
+ Reply to Thread
Results 16 to 30 of 43
Discussion: Battlefield 2142 / Battlefield 2142 - General Discussion - Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server - Vote For. I did not buy NorStrike but WILL if you blend the maps. It's
-
03-20-2007, 10:36 PM #16
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Age
- 46
- Posts
- 114
Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server
Vote For. I did not buy NorStrike but WILL if you blend the maps. It's not that big a deal. Hell, it's not even a small deal.
Jaykay (FastBK) |null|
-
03-20-2007, 11:13 PM #17
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 629
Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server
I'd love to see Liberation of Leipzig and Port Bavaria replace Suez, Shuhia, etc in the regular mix. Bridge at Remagen is just way too huge for my liking unfortunately.
-
03-21-2007, 01:38 AM #18
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Syracuse, New York, United States
- Age
- 23
- Posts
- 644
Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server
the questions really is hey guys do you want three new super fantastic maps in your server vote yes or no.
i vote yes.Current member of the
-
03-21-2007, 03:17 AM #19
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Detroit, MI
- Age
- 25
- Posts
- 632
Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server
I think it'd be a better idea to incorporate some vanilla maps in the rotation on the second server, but then you run into the performance issue with that server.
I think the main server could handle the NS maps in terms of staying full. The server is usually either full or empty so I don't think we'd have a problem keeping it populated. However I think it will deter some people from playing on the server if they are going to be kicked when the next map loads.
I do like the idea of more maps to play on the main server but the restarts often and the full rotation is rarely played through as it is.
-
03-21-2007, 10:22 AM #20
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- the Netherlands
- Age
- 18
- Posts
- 563
Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server
I'm voting no because I don't want NS to be in the same rotation as vanilla bf 2142. That's because I want to be able to choose what I'm playing myself, also I don't really like the NS maps that much and I don't want them to ruin server 1. And if I am in the mood to play NS, then I'll just go to server 2.
-
03-21-2007, 05:12 PM #21
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- Haverhill, Massachusetts, United States
- Age
- 38
- Posts
- 1,968
Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server
I believe mixing the default maps into the Northern Strike server would be a better choice.
-
03-21-2007, 05:59 PM #22
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Age
- 40
- Posts
- 4,079
Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server
Do you ever feel like.........like you've been here before?
-
03-21-2007, 06:02 PM #23
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- HTX
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 1,708
Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server
I was against NS and vanilla on the same server initially, because of all the drama that went on when the boosters were introduced in BF2. After playing NS, I like the maps 10x more then the vanilla maps. And I think there should be a trial period of 1 week to see how things go.
-
03-21-2007, 06:04 PM #24
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Age
- 40
- Posts
- 4,079
Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server
My opinion is that we wouldn't see the drop in players as we did with BF2. The difference being that our BF2 server was not ranked, our 2142 server is. It will always be full, just might be with new people.
Originally Posted by Hambergler
-
03-21-2007, 06:18 PM #25
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Albuquerque NM
- Age
- 40
- Posts
- 1,975
Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server
Indeed...that is why we are proceeding very carefully and I have to say the poll doesn't look very promising for a merger. Originally Posted by JMJ
Do you ever feel like.........like you've been here before?
Proud to have been a member of:
-
03-21-2007, 11:15 PM #26
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Syracuse, New York, United States
- Age
- 23
- Posts
- 644
Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server
i don't know who all these negative posters are since the ns server was full with all the people i consider active tg 2142ers there wasn't anyone on my buddy list that doesn't have NS
Current member of the
-
03-22-2007, 12:56 AM #27
Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server
Ya.. I have the feeling some WoW people come here to vote just for fun
-
03-22-2007, 02:35 AM #28
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Lake Worth,Texas
- Posts
- 8,226
Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server
These 3 maps are better than...Say...about 5 or 6 of of the vanilla maps. I think it would be a good idea.
The boosters for the bf2 didn't last that long, because bf2's life was getting short at that time, 2142 is still very young, and has alot of support still. I'd at least give it a go. Does it really hurt to try?|TG-12th|Undead
-
03-22-2007, 03:17 AM #29
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- HTX
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 1,708
Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server
Is NS dead already?
-
03-22-2007, 03:49 AM #30
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Syracuse, New York, United States
- Age
- 23
- Posts
- 644
Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server
I would play NS if the server wasn't empty, and I like to mix the other maps up as well.
Last edited by Zid; 03-22-2007 at 06:23 AM.
Current member of the
Reply With Quote
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Bookmarks