Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server - Page 2

Jaykay · 03-20-2007, 09:36 PM

Vote For. I did not buy NorStrike but WILL if you blend the maps. It's not that big a deal. Hell, it's not even a small deal.

Hidus · 03-20-2007, 10:13 PM

I'd love to see Liberation of Leipzig and Port Bavaria replace Suez, Shuhia, etc in the regular mix. Bridge at Remagen is just way too huge for my liking unfortunately.

Zid · 03-21-2007, 12:38 AM

the questions really is hey guys do you want three new super fantastic maps in your server vote yes or no.

i vote yes.

**pedestrian01** · 03-21-2007, 02:17 AM

I think it'd be a better idea to incorporate some vanilla maps in the rotation on the second server, but then you run into the performance issue with that server.
I think the main server could handle the NS maps in terms of staying full. The server is usually either full or empty so I don't think we'd have a problem keeping it populated. However I think it will deter some people from playing on the server if they are going to be kicked when the next map loads.
I do like the idea of more maps to play on the main server but the restarts often and the full rotation is rarely played through as it is.

Concr3te · 03-21-2007, 09:22 AM

I'm voting no because I don't want NS to be in the same rotation as vanilla bf 2142. That's because I want to be able to choose what I'm playing myself, also I don't really like the NS maps that much and I don't want them to ruin server 1. And if I am in the mood to play NS, then I'll just go to server 2.

Pfeil22 · 03-21-2007, 04:12 PM

I believe mixing the default maps into the Northern Strike server would be a better choice.

JMJ · 03-21-2007, 04:59 PM

Do you ever feel like.........like you've been here before?

Hambergler · 03-21-2007, 05:02 PM

I was against NS and vanilla on the same server initially, because of all the drama that went on when the boosters were introduced in BF2. After playing NS, I like the maps 10x more then the vanilla maps. And I think there should be a trial period of 1 week to see how things go.

JMJ · 03-21-2007, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hambergler

I was against NS and vanilla on the same server initially, because of all the drama that went on when the boosters were introduced in BF2. After playing NS, I like the maps 10x more then the vanilla maps. And I think there should be a trial period of 1 week to see how things go.

My opinion is that we wouldn't see the drop in players as we did with BF2. The difference being that our BF2 server was not ranked, our 2142 server is. It will always be full, just might be with new people.

experiment626 · 03-21-2007, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMJ

Do you ever feel like.........like you've been here before?

Indeed...that is why we are proceeding very carefully and I have to say the poll doesn't look very promising for a merger.

Zid · 03-21-2007, 10:15 PM

i don't know who all these negative posters are since the ns server was full with all the people i consider active tg 2142ers there wasn't anyone on my buddy list that doesn't have NS

**Lyramion** · 03-21-2007, 11:56 PM

Ya.. I have the feeling some WoW people come here to vote just for fun

**UnDeaD77** · 03-22-2007, 01:35 AM

These 3 maps are better than...Say...about 5 or 6 of of the vanilla maps. I think it would be a good idea.

The boosters for the bf2 didn't last that long, because bf2's life was getting short at that time, 2142 is still very young, and has alot of support still. I'd at least give it a go. Does it really hurt to try?

Hambergler · 03-22-2007, 02:17 AM

Is NS dead already?

Zid · 03-22-2007, 02:49 AM

I would play NS if the server wasn't empty, and I like to mix the other maps up as well.

View Poll Results: Should we merge NS and Vanilla 2142 maps on server #1?
Yes	41	66.13%
No	21	33.87%
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll

03-20-2007, 09:36 PM	#16 (permalink)
Jaykay Join Date: May 2003 Age: 43 Posts: 114	Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server Vote For. I did not buy NorStrike but WILL if you blend the maps. It's not that big a deal. Hell, it's not even a small deal. __________________ Jaykay (FastBK) \|null\|

03-20-2007, 10:13 PM	#17 (permalink)
Hidus Join Date: Feb 2007 Age: 32 Posts: 586	Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server I'd love to see Liberation of Leipzig and Port Bavaria replace Suez, Shuhia, etc in the regular mix. Bridge at Remagen is just way too huge for my liking unfortunately.

03-21-2007, 12:38 AM	#18 (permalink)
Zid Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: New York City Posts: 596	Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server the questions really is hey guys do you want three new super fantastic maps in your server vote yes or no. i vote yes. __________________

03-21-2007, 02:17 AM	#19 (permalink)
pedestrian01 Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Detroit, MI Age: 22 Posts: 495	Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server I think it'd be a better idea to incorporate some vanilla maps in the rotation on the second server, but then you run into the performance issue with that server. I think the main server could handle the NS maps in terms of staying full. The server is usually either full or empty so I don't think we'd have a problem keeping it populated. However I think it will deter some people from playing on the server if they are going to be kicked when the next map loads. I do like the idea of more maps to play on the main server but the restarts often and the full rotation is rarely played through as it is. __________________ Supported Ribbons \| Nomination Guidelines \| Submit a ribbon nomination .....

03-21-2007, 09:22 AM	#20 (permalink)
Concr3te Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: the Netherlands Age: 15 Posts: 564	Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server I'm voting no because I don't want NS to be in the same rotation as vanilla bf 2142. That's because I want to be able to choose what I'm playing myself, also I don't really like the NS maps that much and I don't want them to ruin server 1. And if I am in the mood to play NS, then I'll just go to server 2.

03-21-2007, 04:12 PM	#21 (permalink)
Pfeil22 Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Massachusetts, US Age: 35 Posts: 1,881	Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server I believe mixing the default maps into the Northern Strike server would be a better choice. __________________

03-21-2007, 04:59 PM	#22 (permalink)
JMJ Join Date: Jun 2005 Age: 37 Posts: 4,077	Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server Do you ever feel like.........like you've been here before?

03-21-2007, 05:02 PM	#23 (permalink)
Hambergler Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Houston, TX Age: 33 Posts: 1,063	Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server I was against NS and vanilla on the same server initially, because of all the drama that went on when the boosters were introduced in BF2. After playing NS, I like the maps 10x more then the vanilla maps. And I think there should be a trial period of 1 week to see how things go. __________________

03-21-2007, 10:15 PM	#26 (permalink)
Zid Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: New York City Posts: 596	Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server i don't know who all these negative posters are since the ns server was full with all the people i consider active tg 2142ers there wasn't anyone on my buddy list that doesn't have NS __________________

03-21-2007, 11:56 PM	#27 (permalink)
Lyramion Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Germany Posts: 929	Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server Ya.. I have the feeling some WoW people come here to vote just for fun

03-22-2007, 01:35 AM	#28 (permalink)
UnDeaD77 Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Fort Worth,Texas Age: 22 Posts: 5,846	Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server These 3 maps are better than...Say...about 5 or 6 of of the vanilla maps. I think it would be a good idea. The boosters for the bf2 didn't last that long, because bf2's life was getting short at that time, 2142 is still very young, and has alot of support still. I'd at least give it a go. Does it really hurt to try? __________________

03-22-2007, 02:17 AM	#29 (permalink)
Hambergler Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Houston, TX Age: 33 Posts: 1,063	Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server Is NS dead already? __________________

03-22-2007, 02:49 AM	#30 (permalink)
Zid Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: New York City Posts: 596	Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server I would play NS if the server wasn't empty, and I like to mix the other maps up as well. __________________ Last edited by Zid; 03-22-2007 at 05:23 AM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links