Welcome to Tactical Gamer

View Poll Results: Should we merge NS and Vanilla 2142 maps on server #1?

Voters
62. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    41 66.13%
  • No

    21 33.87%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 43 of 43
Discussion: Battlefield 2142 / Battlefield 2142 - General Discussion - Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server - Originally Posted by MDFubar Yesterday I played on a server that had both NS and
  1. #31

    DeadOnAim's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Age
    35
    Posts
    164

    Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server

    Quote Originally Posted by MDFubar View Post
    Yesterday I played on a server that had both NS and Vanilla maps, also both Conquest and Titan maps. This really mixed it up and the server was almost full most of the time. The variety really kept you going, and not being very big on the Titan maps, I am learning more and more about how to play them effectively. Nothing beats playing in the TG server though!
    I would love to see this also.

    Voted Yes to the NS maps on #1. I don't even play NS on server #2 due to lag issues and server hiccups.

  2.  
  3. #32

    Ainselie's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Age
    26
    Posts
    680

    Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server

    voted yes too--like some people have mentioned already i am not a big fan of sidi, shuhia and verdun and wouldn't mind seeing the ns maps replace 'em

  4.  
  5. #33

    thedogwarrior's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Parkersburg, West Virginia, United States
    Age
    44
    Posts
    2,521
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server

    If it's ok to have NS maps added into the rotation on server #1 (the regular Conquest) - does that imply that the reason for lag/hiccups on the NS (#2) server is that it's a less-capable server? I get lag all the time, dropped connections here and there.. and strange pauses, where it looks like it's going to drop, but then play resumes.

  6.  

     
  7. #34

    Rock's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Plymouth England
    Age
    33
    Posts
    937

    Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server

    I am going to vote yes.

    I would like a rotation of NS maps on server 1, think the time has come to add a little spice to server 1 and this seems the perfect tonic.

    At then end of the day, all you got to do is try it for a week and see how it goes, if it's full all the time you know its a hit, if its not then pull the plug!


    TG-E1st TacticalGamer European Division | Team up with us today!

  8.  
  9. #35


    experiment626's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Albuquerque NM
    Age
    40
    Posts
    1,975

    Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server

    Quote Originally Posted by thedogwarrior View Post
    If it's ok to have NS maps added into the rotation on server #1 (the regular Conquest) - does that imply that the reason for lag/hiccups on the NS (#2) server is that it's a less-capable server? I get lag all the time, dropped connections here and there.. and strange pauses, where it looks like it's going to drop, but then play resumes.
    There is a difference between 1 and 2. #2 server does indeed have "problems".

    Proud to have been a member of:


  10.  
  11. #36

    NoDebate's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Kris Kringle's Midwest Vaction House
    Posts
    377

    Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server

    Quote Originally Posted by TheFatKidDeath View Post
    FatKid voted yes, so shall you!
    I vote yes...and that's why ^^^

    And, that I'm downloading it tonight


    "Courage is being scared to death but saddlin' up anyways." ~John Wayne



    Interested in playing League of Legends? Send me a PM or try it out here...
    http://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4b5355540b735

  12.  

     
  13. #37

    Vacian's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Age
    26
    Posts
    26

    Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server

    I agree with the people who voted yes, and shall vote yes as well. This way, I don't keep having to exit off server 1 to see if anyone is trying to seed server 2.

    EDIT: Er... I'd vote yes if I could, anyway. ^^;;;

  14.  
  15. #38

    VegaBond's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    That smelly place called NJ
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,109

    Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server

    Voted yes and for maybe some folks to come on in the morning to get server started much earlier, I usually have to wait around 1pm est

  16.  
  17. #39

    Guardianx11x's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest/DC metro
    Age
    27
    Posts
    1,060

    Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server

    I'm all for it.
    Shhhh I'm being made




  18.  

     
  19. #40

    Exploding_Silver's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Euroland
    Posts
    7,251
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server

    I agree with Bom that it is about which server is seeded. On Friday we seeded NS at about 6pm EST and it filled up completely after about 1.5 hrs.

    In the last 24 hrs from the time of this post, our NS server has never emptied while ser 1 did empty for about 6-8 hrs.

    Overall I would say that NS offers something good and that enough people have bought it, for a busy second server .... if only its seeded.

  20.  
  21. #41

    thedogwarrior's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Parkersburg, West Virginia, United States
    Age
    44
    Posts
    2,521
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server

    Quote Originally Posted by Vacian View Post
    I agree with the people who voted yes, and shall vote yes as well. This way, I don't keep having to exit off server 1 to see if anyone is trying to seed server 2.

    EDIT: Er... I'd vote yes if I could, anyway. ^^;;;
    There's no need to exit off #1 to check #2... It's safest to go out to the server listing screen (hit ESC while in the game). But once you're there, ALT-TAB out to the windows desktop, and hit the following link in your browser:

    EDIT: I can't post a URL as I've not posted 15x yet... But hit the Game-Monitor site, and search for "tacticalgamer" playing "bf2142" and you'll see a listing of both servers. PM me if you want my saved URL.

    Very handy for checking activity on #1, #2, and if you click on the server name, on the following page it lists all players currently (at least within last 60sec or so) on, and their ping to the server.

    ALT-TAB back in the game... Voila!

  22.  
  23. #42

    Exploding_Silver's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Euroland
    Posts
    7,251
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server

    Quote Originally Posted by thedogwarrior View Post
    There's no need to exit off #1 to check #2... It's safest to go out to the server listing screen (hit ESC while in the game). But once you're there, ALT-TAB out to the windows desktop, and hit the following link in your browser:

    EDIT: I can't post a URL as I've not posted 15x yet... But hit the Game-Monitor site, and search for "tacticalgamer" playing "bf2142" and you'll see a listing of both servers. PM me if you want my saved URL.

    Very handy for checking activity on #1, #2, and if you click on the server name, on the following page it lists all players currently (at least within last 60sec or so) on, and their ping to the server.

    ALT-TAB back in the game... Voila!
    http://www.game-monitor.com/search.p...er&type=server

    or in 2142 menus advanced search for 'tacticalgamer'

  24.  

     
  25. #43

    thedogwarrior's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Parkersburg, West Virginia, United States
    Age
    44
    Posts
    2,521
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Support for Combining Northern Strike and Conquest server

    Thanks for the help Silver! Hadn't really thought about using Adv. Server Search in the game (d'oh!).

  26.  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


  
 

Back to top