Conquest Server: Temporary reduction to 32 players - Page 9

DLBlue · 09-10-2007, 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by superfastkill

SERVER MESSAGE: Lorax74. You have 3 mins to get on a rooftop or you will be kicked!

Just a kick?

**Sirusblk** · 09-10-2007, 03:29 PM

I think you guys made Zoopy cry

Zoopy · 09-10-2007, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirusblk

I think you guys made Zoopy cry

What am I, a woman?

Zoraster · 09-10-2007, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zoopy_T

What am I, a woman?

Yes.

Zoopy · 09-10-2007, 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zoraster

Yes.

You just couldn't give up the 2-for-1 coupon for the plastic surgeon, could you?

**Sirusblk** · 09-11-2007, 03:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zoopy_T

What am I, a woman?

No they were just being mean :P

ultrablue · 09-12-2007, 03:55 PM

Would anybody be against the idea of a SupportingMember password night similarly to what we had in BF2?

Zoopy · 09-12-2007, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ultrablue

Would anybody be against the idea of a SupportingMember password night similarly to what we had in BF2?

The PR password night weren't really that better since the in game messages told people where to get the password, which ended up as a server restart with maybe 10 less people getting back in.

Now if the main server was Titan on the other hand, it would work much better.

**Lorax74** · 09-12-2007, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ultrablue

Would anybody be against the idea of a SupportingMember password night similarly to what we had in BF2?

I'd like to try it out.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zoopy_T

Now if the main server was Titan on the other hand, it would work much better.

Most definitely.

ultrablue · 09-13-2007, 12:20 PM

I believe we had a post with a .txt file attachment containing the PW that only supporting members could view or download. I'm not sure how the whole PR thing worked.

Zoopy · 09-13-2007, 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ultrablue

I believe we had a post with a .txt file attachment containing the PW that only supporting members could view or download. I'm not sure how the whole PR thing worked.

PR had a text file in there public forum. The message said "Go to TacticalGamer.com for the password", so most people who were on before the reset went to go get the password. Unless its a gimmick to get more people on the forums.

Insurgency was sometimes passworded and the password was in the Member Only Section. That sort of forces all the SMs to play that night though.

It could work...

MrMazoku · 09-13-2007, 03:26 PM

We could just alter the 'Make Room for a Supporting Member' boot script so it only allowed Supporting Members.

DLBlue · 09-13-2007, 03:35 PM

If you do this... can it be done on the titan server (AKA server #2, lord knows what you all wanna do with it) and leave the conquest server alone?

MrMazoku · 09-13-2007, 03:59 PM

That sounds like the best idea, as it is generally has a lot less people.

Telorn · 09-13-2007, 04:10 PM

I know the idea behind the PW nights back in the BF2 days was not to prevent non-supporting members from joining on the password night...or even to prevent pubbies from joining. The idea was to create a mostly TG-oriented night while getting individuals to register on our forums to find the password so they'd get their foot in our door and hopefully join the community and read the SOPs and learn about what TG means.

I'm all for a public passworded night on the main BF2142 server as we did in the past for BF2. It limited the majority of people joining the game to those that understand the TG way and enjoy it and those were some fun nights.

09-10-2007, 03:29 PM	#122 (permalink)
Sirusblk Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Orange County Age: 19 Posts: 1,104	Re: Conquest Server: Temporary reduction to 32 players I think you guys made Zoopy cry __________________

09-12-2007, 03:55 PM	#127 (permalink)
ultrablue Join Date: Jul 2005 Age: 25 Posts: 471	Re: Conquest Server: Temporary reduction to 32 players Would anybody be against the idea of a SupportingMember password night similarly to what we had in BF2?

09-13-2007, 12:20 PM	#130 (permalink)
ultrablue Join Date: Jul 2005 Age: 25 Posts: 471	Re: Conquest Server: Temporary reduction to 32 players I believe we had a post with a .txt file attachment containing the PW that only supporting members could view or download. I'm not sure how the whole PR thing worked.

09-13-2007, 03:26 PM	#132 (permalink)
MrMazoku Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 48	Re: Conquest Server: Temporary reduction to 32 players We could just alter the 'Make Room for a Supporting Member' boot script so it only allowed Supporting Members. __________________

09-13-2007, 03:35 PM	#133 (permalink)
DLBlue Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 234	Re: Conquest Server: Temporary reduction to 32 players If you do this... can it be done on the titan server (AKA server #2, lord knows what you all wanna do with it) and leave the conquest server alone? __________________ ---Bellicosity---

09-13-2007, 03:59 PM	#134 (permalink)
MrMazoku Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 48	Re: Conquest Server: Temporary reduction to 32 players That sounds like the best idea, as it is generally has a lot less people. __________________

09-13-2007, 04:10 PM	#135 (permalink)
Telorn Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Georgia Age: 27 Posts: 2,187	Re: Conquest Server: Temporary reduction to 32 players I know the idea behind the PW nights back in the BF2 days was not to prevent non-supporting members from joining on the password night...or even to prevent pubbies from joining. The idea was to create a mostly TG-oriented night while getting individuals to register on our forums to find the password so they'd get their foot in our door and hopefully join the community and read the SOPs and learn about what TG means. I'm all for a public passworded night on the main BF2142 server as we did in the past for BF2. It limited the majority of people joining the game to those that understand the TG way and enjoy it and those were some fun nights. __________________ Telorn

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links