![]() |


|
|||||||
| Battlefield 2142 - Tactics and Missions Discussion Discussion about Battlefield 2142 tactics, maps and missions. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#31 (permalink) | |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North Port, Florida
Age: 26
Posts: 2,715
|
Re: Defensive Strategy Discussion: Cerbere Landing
Quote:
I had a squad that had a ball taking and defending Office Ruins. Of course, we were PAC, but still, we had fun.Anyway, as EU, if you keep in mind that you have the advantage of high ground while defending just about any flag and use that advantage well, you'll be better off. If the team spreads out and creates a line of defense north of Church and South Town, it's very difficult for the enemy to break through. Also, if a breakthrough does occur, it's easier for a squad to fall back to defend Roadblock before it flips.
__________________
![]() my tank is burning not an enemy in sight Arithea lurks -Spiff913 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) | |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ave Maria, FL
Age: 19
Posts: 589
|
Re: Defensive Strategy Discussion: Cerbere Landing
Quote:
On a more serious note, I agree with a previous statement made by someone (don't remember who) that Office Ruins is best used as an early warning system. There's no tactical advantage for the EU to hold it, since it can't receive direct support from any other flag. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California, USA
Posts: 75
|
Re: Defensive Strategy Discussion: Cerbere Landing
Not RDX, APMs.
And one squad should do the Sentry Gun/PDS wall in the middle XD.
__________________
He was told that he should not kill, and he did not kill, until he got into the Army. Then he was told to kill, and he killed. ![]()
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|

