-
03-04-2009, 01:02 PM #16
Re: Harbor/Toll Standoff: Who Has the Advantage?
Often this depends on the map. For example if EU on Care bear is down to just Command and down on tickets, they should defend and watch as the PAC throw away countless tickets running into rocket mines.
Infact, generally speaking if a game is close any team should be looking to defend. If you keep close together when defending, you will be revived and thus not lose tickets. (not so close that everyone gets killed of course)
A good example of back SL'ing (or could SL'ing) was last night on Camp Gib. My team (EU) was down to just Central and down on tickets, which isn't a great position. I think at one point the score was 20 - 39 in PAC favour. So my SL told us to dig in and keep reviving. And so we did that as countless PAC made hopeless manoeuvres and we eventually won 3 - 0.
I think that if the EU has lost Harbour on Camp Gib, it's a waste to go and retake it from Toll. Firstly it's a very hard thing to do, such is the distance and the amount of open ground you will have to cover. Secondly, if the PAC are attacking you they are gonna be losing alot of tickets if you stop them reviving. Thirdly, the PAC aren't going anywhere if the EU has eyes. It's actually quite easy to bypass the EU when they are defending Harbour, but at Toll its very compact and therefore hard to sneak by. Also, the flag is very open, visible to the EU from atleast 3 sides so it would take a large and co-ordinated rush to overhaul it.
|TG-Irr| EmperorMustard
Contrary to popular belief, I am not actually an Emperor, or a Condiment.
Men should either be treated generously or destroyed, because they take revenge for slight injures - for heavy ones they cannot. - Niccolo Machiavelli
-
03-04-2009, 01:27 PM #17
Re: Harbor/Toll Standoff: Who Has the Advantage?
-
03-04-2009, 02:27 PM #18
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Lowell/Medford, MA
- Age
- 26
- Posts
- 549
Re: Harbor/Toll Standoff: Who Has the Advantage?
And why your team loses a ticket if you switch sides mid round, while alive. I used to see this alot before I came to TG. When the number of people on the server would drop below 8, everyone would switch to PAC before the match started. If the tickets were even, then EU would lose ~4 tickets and a few seconds later, the server would declare a win for PAC because of the lack of players, then switch to the next map in the rotation to wait to be seeded. If it was an Assault map, then PAC started with the ticket lead anyways, so everyone just switched to PAC to be on the winning side for the easy win. =(
-
03-04-2009, 03:02 PM #19
Re: Harbor/Toll Standoff: Who Has the Advantage?
This isn't quite right.
Someone disconnecting from the server does not cause your team a ticket, but switching teams will. One is a suicide, one is not.
If the population count dips below the required number of players, we have it set to 8, the map will restart and you'll see the message "Waiting for players, blah blah blah", basically the time when people just goof off since you can't cap flags, etc. When this happens, neither team wins, the map is simply restarted.




TG Primer - BF2142 Server Rules - Code of Conduct
Contact a Game Admin
"..good sportsmanship shouldn't be sacrificed in the name of teamwork. " --WhiskeySix
-
03-04-2009, 04:35 PM #20
Re: Harbor/Toll Standoff: Who Has the Advantage?
To avoid the original questions and offer another:
Seeing as it is much easier to break through Toll Station, as PAC, when EU still has control of harbor and is thus using resources to defend it (and not Toll); How many tickets can PAC afford to lose before capturing Harbor in an effort to make a breakthrough while Toll is less defended? Is it worth it at all to avoid a 30 min standoff? (in other words, should PAC ever allow EU to keep Harbor?)
Its ok if you think I'm crazy, because I am.
-
03-04-2009, 05:03 PM #21
Re: Harbor/Toll Standoff: Who Has the Advantage?
PAC can burst past a heavily defended toll...
Get a SL to climb up the catwalk on the East, have him drop down into the out of bounds zone, run to the wall outside Ruins. There's a huge hill there, and a jump from that over the wall IS possible.
It's worked for me..
So I'd always try to make the push. I hate the monotony of fragging/reviving.TG Naith
-
03-04-2009, 10:53 PM #22
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Lowell/Medford, MA
- Age
- 26
- Posts
- 549
Re: Harbor/Toll Standoff: Who Has the Advantage?
So the "PAC Wins" message is just there for show? (not being sarcastic, honestly asking). If the server dips below 8 during the 2-minute warmup, the round will start and about 5 seconds in it will end with the team with the most tickets getting the Win screen, and the opposite getting the Loss screen (Draw if tickets are equal). I've been on both sides of this so I know for a fact that the win/loss/draw screen comes up, but I never actually tested if the stats are recorded. I also noticed the map isn't simply reset, it goes to the next map, I remember this happening more than once. Server fell below 8, got the win/loss/draw screen, then a different map loaded (I think it was Shuhia, I don't remember was awhile ago). On the new map it had the "waiting for more players" message.
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure that's what happened, again though, I've never tested if stats got sent in to the server.
-
03-05-2009, 08:16 AM #23
Re: Harbor/Toll Standoff: Who Has the Advantage?
Toll may be less defended, but should be defended enough to stop you unless you manage to get a sizable chunk of the PAC team to attack Toll without being stopped by the defence at Harbour.. Would take some co-ordination between SL's to achieve, but why not give it a try? New ideas and tactics are always nice! I'd give this a go.. However, you will then have to move fast for another flag, as having Toll is not good if you don't have Harbour or Central Camp. And defending it then is very hard! In fact most cap-outs I've seen have been when EU only has Harbour or Toll, which shows it's very hard to defend.
I've seen you do this.. In fact I tried to jump the wall as well, and it's not that easy, so I may need to practise! If you spend too long trying to get over the wall though, EU can get someone back there with rockets and it's then very hard to attack at that point. Let's keep it secret and not let everyone know..BF3 Soldier: DrSparky














"Cum bellum clamavit, respondivi"
-
03-05-2009, 08:19 AM #24
Re: Harbor/Toll Standoff: Who Has the Advantage?
BF3 Soldier: DrSparky














"Cum bellum clamavit, respondivi"
-
03-05-2009, 02:29 PM #25
Re: Harbor/Toll Standoff: Who Has the Advantage?
Haha. Usually there is someone there though. Last time Eroak and some other people were watching the wall, waiting for me. So, there's always the challenge, but half the time they'll realise you fail at jumping it and'll move on.
Anything that'll make a TG game better. :]
Also! You can put a beacon on the outside of the wall at any place (Ruins seems to be the best) and the squaddies may spawn inside the wall. Half the time it fails, so be careful!TG Naith
-
03-05-2009, 02:55 PM #26
Re: Harbor/Toll Standoff: Who Has the Advantage?
|TG| Sproge "Tiger how did you flip that tank?!"
|TG-SC| PM07SNV "We need another world war to base more games on..."
|TG-AIR| DrBeat: "I just dropped my propane tank in the fire again"
-
03-05-2009, 03:25 PM #27
Re: Harbor/Toll Standoff: Who Has the Advantage?
I have always wanted to see PAC just fall back and defend Harbor in this scenario. Of course you would have to coordinate the entire team, not just a single squad.
If you <forced> EU to come out into the open, used lots of gadgets like RDX, APMs and sentry guns, you could murder them from the Harbor rooftops..
Proud to have been an Irregular!







-
03-05-2009, 07:28 PM #28
-
03-06-2009, 05:13 AM #29
Re: Harbor/Toll Standoff: Who Has the Advantage?
BF3 Soldier: DrSparky














"Cum bellum clamavit, respondivi"
-
03-06-2009, 01:18 PM #30
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)



Reply With Quote











Bookmarks