![]() |


|
|||||||
| Civilization IV - Game Planning & Coordination Find other Civilization IV players and set up games here! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 25
|
Re: Beyond The Sword PTBS - Format Discussion
Advanced Start - this feature seems to be awesome! I'm thinking 1000 points or so and you should be able to get a decent start to the game without needing to do a live session like we did with ACTF.
* not really a good idea. the first turns are the most fun in terms of exploration and advanced start can be abused. A live session is much more fun IMO. City Flipping After Conquest - so that people are forced to keep garrisons. * Yes!! Barbarians - unlike ACTF I think we should go with Barbarians this time around. * No. Barbarians are only anoying. Ragging barbarians are really no fun. Restricted Leaders - unrestricted leaders seems an interesting twist but it seems to me like it could really unbalance things. I have to think the nations and their leaders were set the way they are for a reason. * Yes!! totaly agree. Choose Religions - what is this option? I haven't played much BTS yet so hopefully someone knows. * If you found a religion you can choose one. It doenst effect gameplay but i prefer the original no choosing religion. No Technology Brokering - YES!!! We did this via honor system for ACTF and I'm glad I won't need to think about it next game. * Yes!! No Vassal States - does having vassals actually make sense in MP? Has anyone seen it happen? * No vassal states indeed. I have seen it happen and there is always trouble. No Tribal Villages - too unbalancing IMO...especially when they start handing out techs. * i agree Random Events - since Barbarians are basically random in themself it makes sense to go one step further and allow random events as well. However, it all depends on how significant an impact they have. If they decimate a Civ then obviously this should be disabled * I dont care it can be fun but sometimes a bit unbalanced. In my last game i finaly got a city captured from my neigbour and the next turn 5 riffleman pop up because of a random event. And i had only axeman and some cats left. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 83
|
Re: Beyond The Sword PTBS - Format Discussion
You get 4 draftable units if someone raze your city. It is not really random but it can sometimes be devastating if you have rather sparse military to begin with and you are more thecnological advanced than your opponent(4 infantry is a lot against an opponent using riflemen and grenadiers).
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | ||
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Posts: 1,085
|
Re: Beyond The Sword PTBS - Format Discussion
Quote:
Quote:
However, it appears that even regular barbarians have more of an impact in BTS so the game won't have any.Bernout |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Posts: 1,085
|
Re: Beyond The Sword PTBS - Format Discussion
Ah yes...I had read somewhere about a gold exploit but it didn't give details. Anything else that might be of concern?
BTW, do you think we should consider using Bruhic's 3.13 patch? I thought that the official one might be good enough but I haven't read enough to be sure. Bernout |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 83
|
Re: Beyond The Sword PTBS - Format Discussion
Well in the official one spys get ejected when you decleare war, multiple graphics are missing(like espionage for buildings that give it and espionage ratios for human civs), people can trade stolen techs if we play with no tech brokering(imo no tech brokering is just as bad as full tech trading though...).
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Posts: 1,085
|
Re: Beyond The Sword PTBS - Format Discussion
Quote:
I'm glad we decided to go with no Barbarians because AFSoccer and I started up a BTS game last night. The first time he gets a Barbarian Horde of 4 Archers appear right outside the borders of his capital. This was like 25 turns into the game or something. Needless to say he got wiped out. What do you guys think about having newer Civ players at Noble difficulty level for the next game while everyone else is at Prince? Bernout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston
Age: 41
Posts: 253
|
Re: Beyond The Sword PTBS - Format Discussion
Quote:
![]() Snarlin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Posts: 1,085
|
Re: Beyond The Sword PTBS - Format Discussion
Quote:
We've never tried this before but it seems an easy way to level things out a bit between the Civ 4 vets and newer players. It doesn't seem like the difference between Noble and Prince would be hugely unbalancing. Bernout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Posts: 1,085
|
Re: Beyond The Sword PTBS - Format Discussion
Ok. Thanks to everyone for tossing around ideas. Here is my proposal for the game format. You have until about March 14 or so to try to get something changed before I post the signup topic and make it official.
![]() TG BTS: The Gathering Storm Advanced Start In order to get off to a faster start, without needing to do a realtime session, we will be using the Advanced Start feature with 600 gold available to be used. Some important points:
Game Format Nation Assignments Players will be assigned player numbers based on an alphabetical list of TG account names. Nations and their leaders will be assigned randomly. Difficulty Level The default difficulty level being used is Prince. This is one level higher than Noble. If you are a newer player to Civ 4 or Civ 4 MP and would like to start at the easier level then please make that clear in your signup. Players who have won a multiplayer game or play single player at Prince level or higher are asked to stay at the default. Settings:
Options:
Victory:
Multiplayer:
Bernout |
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Posts: 1,085
|
Re: Beyond The Sword PTBS - Format Discussion
Quote:
The no tech brokering was much more clear with 1/2 the people voting for it.Anyhow, here's my reasoning for doing it:
![]() Bernout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Posts: 1,085
|
Re: Beyond The Sword PTBS - Format Discussion
A signup topic has now been posted although you won't be able to officially sign up until Saturday. This was done due to the fact that there are a limited number of positions. It gives everyone a fair chance to become aware of the sign up and the provided information.
Game format comments, ideas, opinions, etc. are still welcome prior to Saturday! Nothing should be considered written in stone yet. Ok....so what are you doing still reading! Tell your friends and let's see if we can fill up this game come Saturday! ![]() Bernout Last edited by Bernout; 03-13-2008 at 12:41 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|

