Go Back   Tactical Gamer > Tactical > Counter-Strike Source > Counter-Strike - General Discussion


Counter-Strike - General Discussion General Discussion for Counter-Strike

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-09-2005, 01:35 PM   #1 (permalink)




 
Pokerface's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: MD, USA
Age: 29
Posts: 5,722
Tactical Counter-Strike: Rules

Cing in another thread made reference to Dead Men Walking, a UK community much like our own. I looked them up.

They don't have PCS. They have TCS. And you know what? They have rules, written for all to see. I propose we accept this ruleset and make it our own immediately, if only to have a common ground for all future discussions. Copy/paste/brand backwards on your butt so you can read it in the mirror, but read them one way or another.

http://www.deadmen.co.uk/tcs_rules.php
__________________

NS Game Officer. TF2 Admin. BF2 Admin / Scripter. PM with issues.
Tempus: Pokerface is nailing it right on the head. Everyone who is arguing against him is simply arguing against reality.
<anmuzi> it is not permitted to have privacy or anonymity
<LazyEye> yeah when I play on TG the server digs though my trash

Arm yourself with knowledge: TG NS TF2 BF2
Pokerface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2005, 01:51 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 54
Re: Tactical Counter-Strike: Rules

"Do not stray from your team unless it is as part of a planned team strategy. "

Yes please! D:
tekunogekai is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 02-09-2005, 02:37 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
FOX9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Florida
Age: 22
Posts: 112
Re: Tactical Counter-Strike: Rules

For the most part I am in total agreeance with these "TCS" rules, I even kinda like the name better . Anywho, maybe there could be a thing or two that we need more clarification on just for our TG purposes though. Like the part about TMs calling to rush the other bombsite and using whichever way they want. Dust2 for example. After most TMs die at B while were at A, can we run through their spawn to flank them? I certainly hope not, but through the middle tunnels, yes. The opposite is true for short A. But I am diggin the whole concept.
__________________
We are the music makers,
and we are the dreamers of the dream.
Wandering by lone sea breakers,
and sitting by desolate streams.
World losers and world forsakers,
for whom the pale moon gleams.
Yet we are movers and the shakers of the world forever it seems.
FOX9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2005, 02:54 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 275
Re: Tactical Counter-Strike: Rules

The problem with a written set of rules is that it's trying to put an objective standard on interpretive situations. If you wanted to make objective rules for PCS, you'd have to write so many if, but, then, when, unless, until, statements that it would just turn into a jibberish.

Objective Oriented Teamplay is more of a mindset then anything else. I can give you a guideline of how to play, but it's up to you to evaluate the specific situation and act accordingly.

Therefore, I'm definately against this.
K2_the_Turtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2005, 03:00 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
EssenceOfJudas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 135
Re: Tactical Counter-Strike: Rules

interesting... thats one word for it.. i think its the basics that we already have...
*shrugs*
__________________
-'~-,~-'~-Essence-Of-Judas-,~-~'-~,-
"Real Me Scout"
Pronunciation: 'skaut
Etymology: from Middle French escouter to listen,
1 : to explore an area to obtain information (as about an enemy)
2 : to observe in order to obtain information or evaluate
3 : to use rifle and pick off opposition
4 : to watch for openings in defense for bomb run
5 : headshot
EssenceOfJudas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2005, 03:12 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
Root's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South east england
Posts: 8,839
Thumbs up Re: Tactical Counter-Strike: Rules

Items 3 thru 10 should be copied imho. I can't see anything in those points that contradicts the way we want people to play. This is why I'm in favour of having a password restricted server, and a public server. These sorts of rules are absolutely necessary for the run and gun types we get, but not necessary for those who want to play PCS. None of these points are overly long, and not much would need to be added to keep the masses in line.

By nature I'm someone who enjoys PCS. In my time playing on TG, I was pulled up exactly once by an admin, and I complied with their instruction. I've seen other people like that on the server, and I would imagine we want these people to stay.

Unfortunately for many of the others, it does take a list of rules, and it takes hard boundaries. I would imagine as the CS part of TG grows, there will be enough supporting members to justify more game servers. I would personally like to see them passworded except one, which it has been suggested by others, used as a training ground or vetting process. I don't have a problem with regular people getting access to the passworded servers, and I'm more than happy to spend most of my CS time on the public server should we go down that route.

Root
Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 02-09-2005, 03:17 PM   #7 (permalink)
 
EssenceOfJudas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 135
Re: Tactical Counter-Strike: Rules

same here root!!
same here!
__________________
-'~-,~-'~-Essence-Of-Judas-,~-~'-~,-
"Real Me Scout"
Pronunciation: 'skaut
Etymology: from Middle French escouter to listen,
1 : to explore an area to obtain information (as about an enemy)
2 : to observe in order to obtain information or evaluate
3 : to use rifle and pick off opposition
4 : to watch for openings in defense for bomb run
5 : headshot
EssenceOfJudas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2005, 04:06 PM   #8 (permalink)




 
Pokerface's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: MD, USA
Age: 29
Posts: 5,722
Re: Tactical Counter-Strike: Rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by K2_the_Turtle
The problem with a written set of rules is that it's trying to put an objective standard on interpretive situations. If you wanted to make objective rules for PCS, you'd have to write so many if, but, then, when, unless, until, statements that it would just turn into a jibberish.

Objective Oriented Teamplay is more of a mindset then anything else. I can give you a guideline of how to play, but it's up to you to evaluate the specific situation and act accordingly.

Therefore, I'm definately against this.
Did you even click the link?
__________________

NS Game Officer. TF2 Admin. BF2 Admin / Scripter. PM with issues.
Tempus: Pokerface is nailing it right on the head. Everyone who is arguing against him is simply arguing against reality.
<anmuzi> it is not permitted to have privacy or anonymity
<LazyEye> yeah when I play on TG the server digs though my trash

Arm yourself with knowledge: TG NS TF2 BF2
Pokerface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2005, 04:12 PM   #9 (permalink)




 
Pokerface's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: MD, USA
Age: 29
Posts: 5,722
Re: Tactical Counter-Strike: Rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by EssenceOfJudas
interesting... thats one word for it.. i think its the basics that we already have...
*shrugs*
What's NOT in there is just as important as what is. It doesn't say anything about boundaries, it doesn't call rushers rulebreakers, it doesn't say that moving off the second floor of whatever map is a no-no punishable by kicking or worse.
__________________

NS Game Officer. TF2 Admin. BF2 Admin / Scripter. PM with issues.
Tempus: Pokerface is nailing it right on the head. Everyone who is arguing against him is simply arguing against reality.
<anmuzi> it is not permitted to have privacy or anonymity
<LazyEye> yeah when I play on TG the server digs though my trash

Arm yourself with knowledge: TG NS TF2 BF2
Pokerface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2005, 04:28 PM   #10 (permalink)

 
RandomGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: K-W, Ont.
Age: 27
Posts: 1,729
Re: Tactical Counter-Strike: Rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by K2_the_Turtle
The problem with a written set of rules is that it's trying to put an objective standard on interpretive situations. If you wanted to make objective rules for PCS, you'd have to write so many if, but, then, when, unless, until, statements that it would just turn into a jibberish.

Objective Oriented Teamplay is more of a mindset then anything else. I can give you a guideline of how to play, but it's up to you to evaluate the specific situation and act accordingly.
quoted for truth
RandomGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 02-09-2005, 05:15 PM   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 275
Re: Tactical Counter-Strike: Rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokerface
Did you even click the link?
I was at work when I posted originally and in a hurry. Sorry if it came out abrupt or rude.
K2_the_Turtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2005, 05:18 PM   #12 (permalink)
 
FOX9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Florida
Age: 22
Posts: 112
Re: Tactical Counter-Strike: Rules

I'm with Random Guy how he quoted about the "mindset" aspect of it.

But, I'm definately not against this whole thing.
__________________
We are the music makers,
and we are the dreamers of the dream.
Wandering by lone sea breakers,
and sitting by desolate streams.
World losers and world forsakers,
for whom the pale moon gleams.
Yet we are movers and the shakers of the world forever it seems.
FOX9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2005, 05:21 PM   #13 (permalink)
 
DeRanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 663
Re: Tactical Counter-Strike: Rules

dMw all got their start at N42. Tea Leaf, Sadako and a lot of them learned to play here and eventually branched-out with their own "PCS" server that they call TCS. N42 guidelines were good enough to spawn a whole other community back then I don't see why PCS concepts are so difficult for people to understand now, I really don't. Back then people learned by watching and sticking with their team, there was a whole lot more communication in general and this helped. A smattering of convoluted rules will get you nowhere in teaching the PCS philosophy, Turtle is absolutely right.
DeRanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2005, 09:17 PM   #14 (permalink)




 
Pokerface's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: MD, USA
Age: 29
Posts: 5,722
Re: Tactical Counter-Strike: Rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by K2_the_Turtle
I was at work when I posted originally and in a hurry. Sorry if it came out abrupt or rude.
It didn't come out abrupt or rude, but if you didn't click the link, you kind of missed the point of the thread and really shouldn't be posting.

I've been hounding the admins to get rules written down so both player and admin alike have something concrete to which they can refer when questions about the TG playing style arises. Cing has told me numerous times that he doesn't want to write them, and has told me (or anyone else who pleases) to go ahead and do so. dMw did, and they did a great job of laying the foundation of what TCS is while still leaving room for the nuances everyone seems to be clinging so darn hard to.
__________________

NS Game Officer. TF2 Admin. BF2 Admin / Scripter. PM with issues.
Tempus: Pokerface is nailing it right on the head. Everyone who is arguing against him is simply arguing against reality.
<anmuzi> it is not permitted to have privacy or anonymity
<LazyEye> yeah when I play on TG the server digs though my trash

Arm yourself with knowledge: TG NS TF2 BF2
Pokerface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2005, 11:39 PM   #15 (permalink)
9 v
 
9 v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Age: 43
Posts: 642
Re: Tactical Counter-Strike: Rules

TG CS:S

Server 1: PCS Public - Child PCS.
Server 2: PCS Private - Adult PCS
Server 3: TCS Public - Most ages welcome!

If there's no third server i'd say leave 1 and 2 as they are - pending whatever that is that they are - and if if, there was a third server try TCS out on it.

the Deadmen had a source server for a while, but i think they're more into cs:cz than source and concentrated on that.
9 v is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RULES: Basic Rules of Conduct asch Battlefield 2 - Server Rules 0 08-04-2005 05:04 PM
Battlefield 1942 vs. Counter Strike Source asch Counter-Strike - General Discussion 55 04-26-2005 05:04 PM
Counter Strike Source Linux Mateo Counter-Strike - General Discussion 0 04-22-2005 12:35 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
©2004-2008 - Tactical Gamer - All Rights Reserved