Server 2 Games

SkidMark · 08-03-2005, 02:05 PM

I was thinking, since its so hard to start a game on server 2, that we make a post in this thread of when we to get on. Just say what time that you are going to get on and maybe more people will look at the new posts and say "Well SkidMark is starting a game, maybe I will go and join him." Maybe make this thread sticky or something and then whenever you are going to start a game just post it. People like myself who check forums 2-3 times a day will see the post and hopefully join. This may or may not work but its just a thought. It just stinks that its so hard to get a game going when TG has so many CS:S players.

**Vulcan** · 08-03-2005, 02:44 PM

It's a good thought skid but TBH i think most play Server 1 because they want to play more deathmatch style of play.

I jump on server 2 alot but i also have to admin server 1, so i can't leave it to be shredded.

Mateo · 08-03-2005, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vulcan

It's a good thought skid but TBH i think most play Server 2 because they want to play more deathmatch style of play.

I jump on server 2 alot but i also have to admin server 1, so i can't leave it to be shredded.

If that is the case, then that is a gross misuse of server 2. Deathmatching has no home here.

Server 2 is a pure PCS environment, not a pure Deathmatch environment. Adherence to the SOPs both in spirit, and letter, is assumed on entering that server.

**Tempus** · 08-03-2005, 03:08 PM

I hope that was a typo by Vulcan. If not, any player using server 2 for DM should be banned from the server.

Mateo · 08-03-2005, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tempus

I hope that was a typo by Vulcan. If not, any player using server 2 for DM should be banned from the server.

Isn't that "banned from BOTH servers"?

**Vulcan** · 08-03-2005, 03:34 PM

lol fixed my typo, yeah i meant server 1. Sadly it's barely above deathmatching most of the time. But it is still a learning ground for PCS.

Mateo · 08-03-2005, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vulcan

lol fixed my typo, yeah i meant server 1. Sadly it's barely above deathmatching most of the time. But it is still a learning ground for PCS.

Oh, man! Does that mean I have to put away the ban hammer?

**Vulcan** · 08-03-2005, 03:39 PM

sheath thee great hammer of doom!

SkidMark · 08-03-2005, 03:59 PM

Yeah I know what you mean but it was just a thought though.

SuperSteve · 08-06-2005, 08:39 PM

The only problem with that idea, skid, is that there would be far too many people who would post "It's 8 PM EST here and server 1 is full

... So I'm starting a game on server 2, you should all join!". Then, their next action would be to go sit on server 2 for 15 minutes (max) then abruptly decide that it is a lost cause, and leave. It would only work if you had to have special priviledges to post that you were starting a game. Priviledges that show to the rest of the community that you are actually seriously going to start a game, meaning, not following the steps I posted before.

Oh, maybe scheduling games maybe a day or 2 ahead of time would be nice for a sticky thread. Just an idea. This almost seems like it should be posted in roots to-do list as a suggestion.

Root · 08-08-2005, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TG_Mateo

Oh, man! Does that mean I have to put away the ban hammer?

Not unless you can't justify using it. Put another way, keep banning.

Root

poe · 08-08-2005, 08:03 PM

TG people should go to the protected server more often. Lately, I have tried to gather some people with me and head there for a while. Sometimes it works amazingly well (full server in the wee hours of the morning), and sometimes absolutely nobody joins.

The public server is just that - public. It's half full of hooligans, a quarter TG-players, and a quarter of people trying to keep other people under control. In the Protected server, there is the "guarentee" (or should be), that there will be no monkey business.

When I boot up CS:S, the first thing I check is the protected server. Sadly, it's most often empty.
(Okay, that's a lie. I check for cs_harvest servers first =P)

SkidMark · 08-08-2005, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poe

I check for cs_harvest servers first =P

Ewwww.....

Of course you are a fairly good sniper, so you probably would like that map.

AzzMan · 08-08-2005, 11:26 PM

It's a fine map.

08-03-2005, 02:05 PM	#1 (permalink)
SkidMark Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Louisville, KY Age: 19 Posts: 459	Server 2 Games I was thinking, since its so hard to start a game on server 2, that we make a post in this thread of when we to get on. Just say what time that you are going to get on and maybe more people will look at the new posts and say "Well SkidMark is starting a game, maybe I will go and join him." Maybe make this thread sticky or something and then whenever you are going to start a game just post it. People like myself who check forums 2-3 times a day will see the post and hopefully join. This may or may not work but its just a thought. It just stinks that its so hard to get a game going when TG has so many CS:S players. __________________ \|CS:S Development Team\| \|CS:S Announcements, Rules, and SOP's\|

08-03-2005, 02:44 PM	#2 (permalink)
Vulcan Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Montreal Age: 30 Posts: 7,346	Re: Server 2 Games It's a good thought skid but TBH i think most play Server 1 because they want to play more deathmatch style of play. I jump on server 2 alot but i also have to admin server 1, so i can't leave it to be shredded. __________________ TG Primer - CSS SOP's - INS SOP's Last edited by Vulcan; 08-03-2005 at 03:33 PM.

08-03-2005, 03:08 PM	#4 (permalink)
Tempus Join Date: May 2003 Location: Miami, FL Age: 38 Posts: 8,170	Re: Server 2 Games I hope that was a typo by Vulcan. If not, any player using server 2 for DM should be banned from the server. __________________ Battlefield 2/2142 Game Officer Contact me with server/player/admin issues. -- Suits are what you wear when doing things you shouldn’t want to do anyway. FROM THE TACTICAL GAMER PRIMER. 3) Support game play in a near-simulation environment. Where the focus of play would not be solely on doing what it takes to win, but doing so utilizing real-world combat strategy and tactics rather than leveraging exploits provided to players by the design of the game engine.

08-03-2005, 03:34 PM	#6 (permalink)
Vulcan Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Montreal Age: 30 Posts: 7,346	Re: Server 2 Games lol fixed my typo, yeah i meant server 1. Sadly it's barely above deathmatching most of the time. But it is still a learning ground for PCS. __________________ TG Primer - CSS SOP's - INS SOP's

08-03-2005, 03:39 PM	#8 (permalink)
Vulcan Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Montreal Age: 30 Posts: 7,346	Re: Server 2 Games sheath thee great hammer of doom! __________________ TG Primer - CSS SOP's - INS SOP's

08-03-2005, 03:59 PM	#9 (permalink)
SkidMark Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Louisville, KY Age: 19 Posts: 459	Re: Server 2 Games Yeah I know what you mean but it was just a thought though. __________________ \|CS:S Development Team\| \|CS:S Announcements, Rules, and SOP's\|

08-06-2005, 08:39 PM	#10 (permalink)
SuperSteve Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Kentucky Age: 18 Posts: 408	Re: Server 2 Games The only problem with that idea, skid, is that there would be far too many people who would post "It's 8 PM EST here and server 1 is full ... So I'm starting a game on server 2, you should all join!". Then, their next action would be to go sit on server 2 for 15 minutes (max) then abruptly decide that it is a lost cause, and leave. It would only work if you had to have special priviledges to post that you were starting a game. Priviledges that show to the rest of the community that you are actually seriously going to start a game, meaning, not following the steps I posted before. Oh, maybe scheduling games maybe a day or 2 ahead of time would be nice for a sticky thread. Just an idea. This almost seems like it should be posted in roots to-do list as a suggestion.

08-08-2005, 08:03 PM	#12 (permalink)
poe Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Olympia, Washington (USA) Age: 21 Posts: 1,105	Re: Server 2 Games TG people should go to the protected server more often. Lately, I have tried to gather some people with me and head there for a while. Sometimes it works amazingly well (full server in the wee hours of the morning), and sometimes absolutely nobody joins. The public server is just that - public. It's half full of hooligans, a quarter TG-players, and a quarter of people trying to keep other people under control. In the Protected server, there is the "guarentee" (or should be), that there will be no monkey business. When I boot up CS:S, the first thing I check is the protected server. Sadly, it's most often empty. (Okay, that's a lie. I check for cs_harvest servers first =P)

08-08-2005, 11:26 PM	#14 (permalink)
AzzMan Banned Join Date: May 2005 Location: Daytona Beach, FL Age: 17 Posts: 1,774	Re: Server 2 Games It's a fine map.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Server Schedule	Eggplant999	Battlefield 2 - General Discussion	33	04-14-2006 07:07 PM
Battlefield 2 Servers Updated to 1.3	Apophis	Tactical Gamer News Items	11	10-26-2005 10:00 PM
Server Configuration / Settings FAQ	asch	Battlefield 2 - Technical Support & FAQs	1	07-12-2005 09:22 AM
Battlefield 2 readme	Tempus	Battlefield 2 - Technical Support & FAQs	14	06-15-2005 04:09 AM

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links