Sacrificing Hostage

Sara · 05-11-2008, 06:23 PM

Are you aloud to sacrifice a hostage to save a different hostage like as a distraction. Say your getting shot at from behind and u turn a corner. Are you aloud to let go of one hostage to make it look like you lost the hostage going one way were in all your going to total opposite way. Just as a diversion?

**sparhawkxx** · 05-12-2008, 03:13 PM

If you was a hostage and was on your way to being saved would you want someone to tell you to stay behind?

I would say save the hostages and take your chances of getting killed trying your best.

Oh unless they get stuck and you can save one by all means then your fine.

Sara · 05-12-2008, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sparhawkxx

If you was a hostage and was on your way to being saved would you want someone to tell you to stay behind?

If its for my country =] lol.
and there not real so y'know

Bunny_NUM · 05-13-2008, 12:24 AM

The Utilitarianism approach. Sacrifice one to save the many others.

**Assault9** · 05-13-2008, 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sara

If its for my country =] lol.
and there not real so y'know

Hence the reason for the simulation aspect of TG PCS. If we simply treated them as cattle they would have no meaning at all. But as a CT they are your primary objective to rescue, and as a T, your primary objective to hold on to at all costs.

Sara · 05-13-2008, 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Assault9

hold on to at all costs.

Hold on at all cost...Would that mean shooting them in the back of the head if there running away?

**Assault9** · 05-13-2008, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sara

Hold on at all cost...Would that mean shooting them in the back of the head if there running away?

Check the SOPs for that one

Sara · 05-13-2008, 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Assault9

Check the SOPs for that one

Haha =]

Potshot · 05-14-2008, 03:06 PM

No if you are using it as a meatshield of sort, but yes if it is for a tactical reason and the hostage would encumber you. But generally forfeiting already taken property or area is untactical and stupid, unless there is no other option. I suppose if your survival depended on it, you could leave him behind and come for him later. I just can't see a situation where you'd have to do that.

**Clefspeare** · 05-14-2008, 03:50 PM

The only reason I could see leaving a hostage behind as a CT is if it gets stuck and you are being chased.

**ultima110** · 05-15-2008, 12:36 PM

A hostage should never be PURPOSFULLY left behind. The Cts are there to rescue the hostages, not leave them behind. If u go in for the hosties, do your best to leave with all of them that u tagged.

05-11-2008, 06:23 PM	#1 (permalink)
Sara Join Date: May 2008 Location: New Jersey Posts: 130	Sacrificing Hostage Are you aloud to sacrifice a hostage to save a different hostage like as a distraction. Say your getting shot at from behind and u turn a corner. Are you aloud to let go of one hostage to make it look like you lost the hostage going one way were in all your going to total opposite way. Just as a diversion? __________________ Me - I'll Just blame bush. Disciple - Bush? Is that some sort of slang for women? - Hahaha I love disciple. btw Bush = worst president ever.

05-12-2008, 03:13 PM	#2 (permalink)
sparhawkxx Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Louisiana Posts: 1,734	Re: Sacrificing Hostage If you was a hostage and was on your way to being saved would you want someone to tell you to stay behind? I would say save the hostages and take your chances of getting killed trying your best. Oh unless they get stuck and you can save one by all means then your fine. __________________ FUN FUN

05-13-2008, 12:24 AM	#4 (permalink)
Bunny_NUM Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Alleyways Posts: 22	Re: Sacrificing Hostage The Utilitarianism approach. Sacrifice one to save the many others. __________________ This is my rifle. There are many like it, but this one is MINE. My rifle is my best friend. It is my life. I must master it as I must master my life. My rifle without me is useless. Without my rifle, I am useless.

05-14-2008, 03:06 PM	#9 (permalink)
Potshot Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Finland Posts: 223	Re: Sacrificing Hostage No if you are using it as a meatshield of sort, but yes if it is for a tactical reason and the hostage would encumber you. But generally forfeiting already taken property or area is untactical and stupid, unless there is no other option. I suppose if your survival depended on it, you could leave him behind and come for him later. I just can't see a situation where you'd have to do that.

05-14-2008, 03:50 PM	#10 (permalink)
Clefspeare Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 916	Re: Sacrificing Hostage The only reason I could see leaving a hostage behind as a CT is if it gets stuck and you are being chased. __________________ Alright, let's jump this jump.

05-15-2008, 12:36 PM	#11 (permalink)
ultima110 Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Los Angeles, Ca Age: 19 Posts: 63	Re: Sacrificing Hostage A hostage should never be PURPOSFULLY left behind. The Cts are there to rescue the hostages, not leave them behind. If u go in for the hosties, do your best to leave with all of them that u tagged. __________________ First Sergeant Ultima \|TG-303rd\| This is where i'd put a ribbon if i had one. \| \| .\__\ ...../

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links

Sponsored links