Sara

Are you aloud to sacrifice a hostage to save a different hostage like as a distraction. Say your getting shot at from behind and u turn a corner. Are you aloud to let go of one hostage to make it look like you lost the hostage going one way were in all your going to total opposite way. Just as a diversion?

__________________
Me - I'll Just blame bush.
Disciple - Bush? Is that some sort of slang for women? - Hahaha I love disciple.

btw Bush = worst president ever.

sparhawkxx

If you was a hostage and was on your way to being saved would you want someone to tell you to stay behind?

I would say save the hostages and take your chances of getting killed trying your best.

Oh unless they get stuck and you can save one by all means then your fine.

__________________
FUN FUN

Sara

If its for my country =] lol.
and there not real so y'know

__________________
Me - I'll Just blame bush.
Disciple - Bush? Is that some sort of slang for women? - Hahaha I love disciple.

btw Bush = worst president ever.

Bunny_NUM

The Utilitarianism approach. Sacrifice one to save the many others.

__________________
This is my rifle.
There are many like it, but this one is MINE.
My rifle is my best friend. It is my life.
I must master it as I must master my life.
My rifle without me is useless. Without my rifle, I am useless.

Assault9

Hence the reason for the simulation aspect of TG PCS. If we simply treated them as cattle they would have no meaning at all. But as a CT they are your primary objective to rescue, and as a T, your primary objective to hold on to at all costs.

__________________
Kermit - "Now, if we want to get Miss Piggy out of jail we're going to have to catch those thieves red-handed. Yes Beau?"

Beauregard - "What color are their hands now?"

Sara

Hold on at all cost...Would that mean shooting them in the back of the head if there running away?

__________________
Me - I'll Just blame bush.
Disciple - Bush? Is that some sort of slang for women? - Hahaha I love disciple.

btw Bush = worst president ever.

Assault9

Check the SOPs for that one

__________________
Kermit - "Now, if we want to get Miss Piggy out of jail we're going to have to catch those thieves red-handed. Yes Beau?"

Beauregard - "What color are their hands now?"

Sara

Haha =]

__________________
Me - I'll Just blame bush.
Disciple - Bush? Is that some sort of slang for women? - Hahaha I love disciple.

btw Bush = worst president ever.

Potshot

No if you are using it as a meatshield of sort, but yes if it is for a tactical reason and the hostage would encumber you. But generally forfeiting already taken property or area is untactical and stupid, unless there is no other option. I suppose if your survival depended on it, you could leave him behind and come for him later. I just can't see a situation where you'd have to do that.

Clefspeare

The only reason I could see leaving a hostage behind as a CT is if it gets stuck and you are being chased.

__________________
Alright, let's jump this jump.

ultima110

A hostage should never be PURPOSFULLY left behind. The Cts are there to rescue the hostages, not leave them behind. If u go in for the hosties, do your best to leave with all of them that u tagged.

__________________
Ultima |TG-303rd|

This is where i'd put a ribbon if i had one.
|
|
.\__\
...../