Thread: de_penstock spot dispute
-
09-01-2009 05:27 PM #1
de_penstock spot dispute
Ok well here is the spot I was using when osme one made a complaint against it, lets see what people think. I have used the spot countless times and never had any complaint more than cheeky, but alls fair so lets here opinions.
This is my point of view notice you can see where my feet would be if I had any:

This is my view when I turn to the side on the ledge:

Finally this is a view of the ledge from ghost mode, sorry I couldn't get a pick of me on the ledge since well I can't take picks from outside of my field of view:

So what do people think?


"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
Winston Churchill
-
09-02-2009 06:30 AM #2
Re: de_penstock spot dispute
From what I can see, it'd be realistically possible to stand on it. I don't see a problem.
-
09-02-2009 08:14 AM #3
Re: de_penstock spot dispute
Looks ok to me but if you're clipping through objects from a players point of view then it might be an issue as they probably can't hurt you in a few places. The model could be inside the object or in that case multiple body parts are clipping.
-
09-05-2009 12:41 PM #4
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Wichita KS
- Age
- 29
- Posts
- 280
Re: de_penstock spot dispute
When you turn to the side on the ledge, second screen shot, one of your legs hangs off the ledge. This was not allowed by the rules I thought? If so, then railing should be fine to stand on right?
-
09-05-2009 04:10 PM #5
Re: de_penstock spot dispute
No it is not fine to stand on railings. The rule i have heard from my first time on the server is that if the area is larger than your head then it's fine to stand on. That ledge is obviously larger than his head so i think it's fine as long as he doesnt clip through the map as vulcan stated.
-
09-05-2009 04:12 PM #6
Re: de_penstock spot dispute
it's not about what you see but rather how the game works greflin.
If he's still shootable then the ledge imo works fine because it isn't unrealistic to use it but I think in this case it's to close. I'd have to say err on the side of better gameplay with this one and just stear clear of it.
-
09-05-2009 05:26 PM #7
Re: de_penstock spot dispute
Yeah I mean some things you have to work with because of the sillyness with the game moduels, such as walking down stairs your feet don't touch the steps but you could fire off of that.
Where as on Vegas you can climb into the candeleers and both feet can be well inside the edge but as Vulcan pointed out they would not realistically hold you.
I see nothing wrong with the width of the position in question but some one mentions my heade my clip due to low ceiling so I will have to check that.


"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
Winston Churchill
-
09-05-2009 08:20 PM #8
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Wichita KS
- Age
- 29
- Posts
- 280
Re: de_penstock spot dispute
I know rails are not fine, it was just the point. The spot is against the spirit of the rules, but since Vulcan has decided I will no longer complain about it. I just thought a spot where a huge chunk of your body was hanging off the edge would go against realism, which is what we were trying to achieve. But, whatever.
-
09-05-2009 08:31 PM #9
Re: de_penstock spot dispute
The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. ~ Bertrand Russell
I have a tendency to key out three or four things and then let them battle for supremacy while I key, so there's a lot of backspacing as potential statements are slaughtered and eaten by the victors. ~ Magna Centipede
-
09-05-2009 11:13 PM #10
-
09-06-2009 09:10 AM #11
Re: de_penstock spot dispute
Yeah, just about all I could manage was heckling the people below me.
The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. ~ Bertrand Russell
I have a tendency to key out three or four things and then let them battle for supremacy while I key, so there's a lot of backspacing as potential statements are slaughtered and eaten by the victors. ~ Magna Centipede
-
09-06-2009 02:13 PM #12
Re: de_penstock spot dispute
Sorry to disapoint but against what 1er may believe I am not rich and my house does not have chandelier in to hang off lol.



"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
Winston Churchill
-
09-21-2009 01:59 PM #13
Re: de_penstock spot dispute
Do you use the rail to access the spot?

"If men cease to believe that they will one day become gods then they will surely become worms."
-Henry Miller
-
09-22-2009 03:34 AM #14
Re: de_penstock spot dispute
No you use the big air vent duct next to the ledge and boost off some one elses head to get there.



"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
Winston Churchill
-
09-26-2009 11:15 PM #15
Re: de_penstock spot dispute
Seems acceptable just get a few pics from another players prospective to clear the clipping issue from multiple angles friendly and possible enemy positions if full range of movement its possible i see no problem with that spot its just unlikely that it would be used.. but if bombsite b is the target or bomb is planted at b then it would be a situation where it can be used any other time its not likely it would be used
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)





Reply With Quote












Bookmarks