![]() |


|
|
#136 (permalink) |
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Montreal
Age: 30
Posts: 7,560
|
Re: Reputation System
That's a base system, you could add modifiers to that. let's say your ratio sits at 100% until you give rep to the same person 2 times, then it drops to 75% and on the 3rd time it drops to 50% and the 4th it drops to 25%.
1st and 2nd = 100% 3rd = 75% 4th = 50% 5th = 25% and to control recieving versus giving, you can only recieve as much as you've given out. This is all pretty much theory and probably not even possible. :P |
|
|
|
|
#138 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Pablo, California
Posts: 4,565
|
Re: Reputation System
Something I don't get: We're all familiar with the "you must spread rep around" message. How can the system be abused to pile up rep on one person when this limiter is in place? Was somebody creating multiple "smurf" accounts to aggregrate rep? (The question is academic: I find the problem of designing systems that defend themselves from "gaming" interesting.)
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#139 (permalink) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Gillette Stadium, Section 309, Row 12, Seat 24
Age: 33
Posts: 8,468
|
Re: Reputation System
the problem was that it's like an unstable filter: the more rep you have the more rep you can give... so if you get a group of people +repping eachother (even if all +reps were completely appropriate and well deserved), the collective rep of that group grows exponentially. when Apo stepped in, some were dishing out rep points close to 50 at a time...
so just a single person +repping one quality post was carring more weight than if 40 inidividuals gave you +rep for a bunch of different posts. This invalidated the rep-bubbles because there's no way to tell if that new bubble was a result of 5 +reps or from 200 +reps. edit: this is why I think we should put the bubbles back and just make it MyRep++ and not MyRep = MyRep + (GiversRep/100) .. or whatever it was... |
|
|
|
|
#140 (permalink) | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Age: 36
Posts: 8,974
|
Re: Reputation System
Quote:
In any case, this topic has run its course. Once all the rep tweaks have been made, an announcement will be posted detailing how it is used.
__________________
Diplomacy is the art of saying "good doggie" while looking for a bigger stick.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| It's OUT! | Magnum50 | America's Army - General Discussion | 19 | 09-17-2006 09:52 PM |
| Taking the leap... first PC build | Mirfee | Hardware & Software Discussion | 37 | 07-02-2006 09:25 PM |
| User Reputation FAQ - Discussion | Apophis | General Discussion | 19 | 06-24-2005 01:05 AM |

