Invitations into discussion is the entire point of this thread. Not invitations to not be taken seriously. There are flaws, and holes, but the design in my head works out. When you refer to perpetual force/motion, you're on a different battle ground. You are talking about never-ending force/motion, where I am referring to REGENERATIVE force/motion.

Pepertual force in its entirety is based off the idea that once started, it will never stop. This isn't my point, at all.

Imagine a battery. The battery loses its charge after so long, but can be recharged on a connection to the wall, or etc. So, we take that basic idea, and we formulate an idea that creates an energy source by itself to recharge the battery. Friction isn't a factor, because we are working with friction. Wind resistance isn't a factor, because that goes into the car itself and not the system I am referring to.


You have a rod. Just like a basic generator, with copper wire and metal and the lot of it.

You have a car, with a tank of gas. You start the car, back out into the road, and start going down the road. After 2 miles your car has created enough energy to be stored into a capacitor. The capacitor itself discharges the electricity which pushes the car. You would have to have a mechanism that used the electricity to push the car, but electric motors are seen every day inside toy cars.

While the electricity is discharged from the capacitors into the electric motor, the generators placed on the rod of the car replenish the capacitors in order to further produce a discharge.

Anyone who has taken basic electronics knows what a capacitor is and what it does. They also know what a generator is, and what it does. I'm just combining the two. I understand that generators are on a HUGE scale when it comes to creating large amounts of electricity, but I'm not looking to totally fuel the car off of it, I'm looking to lessen our dependance on fuels. Lessen the destruction we're causing to our atmosphere.

Okay, one more time.

----------------------------- rod
O generator
U capacitr
... wire

--o------------o-- .... U then comes the electric motor. The rod will be the axle of the car. The o's are the generators, positioned near the wheel. The u will connect to the capacitor. The capacitor will fire into the electric motor at certain intervals to serve as a continuator, I suppose I should say.

Say pushing the gas peddal to sustain a speed of 60 miles an hour consumes a gallon of gas every 30 miles. With this design in place, we could lessen that consumption. Assume that the electricity from the discharging capacitors fire enough force into the secondary motors to lessen that usage to half a gallon of gas per 30 miles at 60 miles an hour.

Take that and combine it with today's ethenol, and H20 and etc, powered cars, and we have a clean environment with no Co2 production from our automobiles, plus we use LESS of the fuel we can create, meaning LESS polution and waste coming from factories and plants creating these fuels.

If all else fails, we lessen the consumption of fossil fuel in the United States at large, simply by attatching a circuit system to the car, and adding a few electric motors. We may never see a car run solely on electricity that never has to be recharged, but that's not what I'm looking to produce here. I'm looking to combine this with the usage of other fuels to lessen our production/usage.

PS: I got touchy because people made this out to be a joke before they took the time to take it seriously. I'm honestly getting tired of seeing that here in TG, and to put it quite bluntly, I believe that no one is doing anything to stop it. If we have restrictions on our language to change the way we act in our servers so that we may be more mature about the way we play, we may even have to go to rules for our actions so that we act more mature about the way we treat others. Before you shoot someone's idea down with the assumption they are joking, or they don't know what they're talking about, concider that you may have misunderstood their meaning, or they have written things out wrong and mislead your thought.

I was very offended by the lack of seriousness this thread brought back from its replies. And, I don't want to see it again in any of the threads I begin.

-Mom

Edit - I'm not looking for effeciency. I'm looking to lessen the amount of fossil fuels and etc that we consume by using this product. Instead of thinking of it as the gas that comes out of the pump, think of it as the spark plug that causes the combustion. You change your spark plugs enough, you get better fuel mileage. I'm combining two fuels to create one to lessen the usage of the first. Get it?

And on a side note, I don't know much about cars. I don't even know everything about component side electricity, but I know the basics, and that's all I'm looking to work with. I am asking TG for help mainly to further TG. If this idea were to be put to productorial use, I wouldn't label it with my name, I would label it with ours. TG is a family, regardless of what some people think, and what a family comes up with, a family gets credit for.