Welcome to Tactical Gamer

+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 14 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 199
Discussion: General Forums / General Discussion - New Look - Originally Posted by Apophis I'm not opposed to switching up some of the colors a
  1. #61

    Trooper's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Age
    29
    Posts
    9,329

    Re: New Look

    Quote Originally Posted by Apophis View Post
    I'm not opposed to switching up some of the colors a bit, that's relatively easy. As long as the modifications I'm making are to the CSS values in the database (There is no static css file, it's generated dynamically, along with everything else, from the database) it won't be too bad to update come patch time.

    I know some people don't like it, but very few that don't like it have actually defined what they dislike about it or made suggestions for improvement. But most of these people also still have time to play games once in a while. Hell, I hadn't even finished with the template changes from vBulletin 3.6.1 when 3.6.2 came out. I was given the choice to just start all over again on the changes, or finally move to something that required a lot less time.

    If i remember correctly the same additude toward the last look was given by mostely the same people. Its different and people will have to get usto it. Its not like we Joined TG just for the wierd colored forums. I mean if this gives apophis more gaming and family time, i dont see how he COULDNT change the forum look. And if this look gives more tools, how about we all wait to see what it looks like in the final stage before you people start bitching about it
    that sounds like a good idea trooper.
    -Vulcan

  2.  
  3. #62

    Wyzcrak's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Memphis, TN
    Posts
    14,267

    Re: New Look

    Oh gross, Trooper. Don't make this personal with talk of "the same people". Having not commented on our new palette, I'll say no one's bitching about the maintenance simplification. That's what saves Apophis significant time (which I'm sure everyone's thrilled about, given the boost Apophis' presence on the other team gives anyone's KD!), not presenting a gray background color over a tan one.

    We're talking browser rendering of background and foreground colors and image URLs here. 2003 stuff. Stuff that sufficiently-savvy webinauts (laff. surely that word exists.) reasonably expect to control for themselves in 2007.

    It's apparent after speaking with Apophis that vBulletin too-tightly bundles the appearance of UI objects with their functionality. I'm amazed, really. For being so impressed by the model by which they allow their license owners to extend the functional experience (which, of course, should require server access), I'm very disappointed that the vBulletin application designers make it so difficult to customize the aesthetic experience (which, today, should NOT require server access) of whatever functionality the server-side configuration dictates.

    I'm all for the server-residing resources defining default simple aesthetics values, but they should do so with today's methodologies which facilitate client-side personalization of those values. A template should define that there's a space, to the left of a thread title, that I can click on to go to the oldest unread post in the thread. And a template should define a default image URL to display in that space. I just want it to render that space to my browser using contemporary conventions which allow an end-user to personalize it. I want to change its color. Someone mentioned earlier in this thread changing its size. Changing when the space appears at all might justify server-side modifications. That's functionality. Easily changing its aesthetics properties if and when it displays shouldn't. That's pure cosmetics.

    I wouldn't be surprised if the good folks at vBulletin move in that direction, and maybe even create motivation for third-party template publishers to do the same, with future releases. I realize that slapping a customized style definition on a dymanic web application is harder than sprucing up your Geocities homepage, but I'm pretty well accustomed to being impressed with the innovations vBulletin include (and/or create) in their releases, and them improving on their client-side aesthetics customization options would certainly impress me.
    Steam Community? Add me. | Join #tacticalgamer | Search Results Legend | New Posts Forum Filter | Postbox Toggle | Live Thread Review | One Line Results | Free Remote, Encrypted Backup

    Darkilla: In short, NS is pretty much really fast chess. With guns. Apophis: I haven't seen anyone say that SM's are better than non-SMs. Nordbomber: This is THE first server I've seen where either side can comeback from out of seemingly nowhere with the right teamwork. en4rcment: I have NEVER experienced the type of gameplay that I have found here. Nightly I am amazed at the personalities and gaming talent. Zephyr: Apophis is clearly a highly sophisticated self-aware AI construct that runs on a highly modified toaster oven in Wyzcrak's basement.

  4.  
  5. #63

    Wolfseven's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    166

    Re: New Look

    I agree if MSN can do it and Yahoo can do it we should be able to control our own web viewing personal page. In theory if you have to sign in, then you have a footprint into the system and should be able to change your viewing option not hindering anyone else’s view...
    Asus P5WDHDeluxlatest bios2901|| E8600Intel Core2 duo3.33ghz || PC2-6400-800mhz 4gb ||EVGAGeForce GTX260 Cor216 896mbv190.62|| 850wAntectrqpower || CreativeX-F1 extrem5.1 latest || Vista64bit || latest TrackIr4Pro./irEnhancement || JoystickSaitekst290pro || SaitekRudderpedalsPro || X52ThrottleControler || G15Keyboard/RazerDiamondBackMouse || 28"Lcd HDMI iF281D I-INC

  6.  

     
  7. #64

    Trooper's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Age
    29
    Posts
    9,329

    Re: New Look

    Quote Originally Posted by Wyzcrak View Post
    Oh gross, Trooper. Don't make this personal with talk of "the same people". Having not commented on our new palette, I'll say no one's bitching about the maintenance simplification. That's what saves Apophis significant time (which I'm sure everyone's thrilled about, given the boost Apophis' presence on the other team gives anyone's KD!), not presenting a gray background color over a tan one.

    If you arent complianing then dont take it personal. I was just pointing out lets wait for a finished product, with all the bells and whistles before people start complaining about this weird color choice. You cant tell me this doesnt look more professional then say planetbattlefield or a clan site.
    that sounds like a good idea trooper.
    -Vulcan

  8.  
  9. #65

    Pokerface's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    MD, USA
    Age
    33
    Posts
    5,914

    Re: New Look

    http://juicystudio.com/services/colourcontrast.php
    The difference in brightness between the two colours is sufficient. The threshold is 125, and the result of the foreground and background colours is 163.

    The difference in colour between the two colours is not sufficient. The threshold is 500, and the result of the foreground and background colours is 495. Whilst the colour difference doesn't comply with the W3C specified range, it does comply with the range used by Hewlett Packard. Hewlett Packard recommends a colour difference limit of 400.
    EDIT: Before I get accused of not suggesting something, allow me to say that I think the color contrast needs to be boosted. W3C may say 500 (and we're at 495) but 500 is still hard on the eyes. I'm not seeking black on white or anything, but the gray is too dark for confortable reading.

    NS Game Officer. TF2 Admin. BF2 Admin / Scripter. PM with issues.
    Tempus: Pokerface is nailing it right on the head. Everyone who is arguing against him is simply arguing against reality.
    <anmuzi> it is not permitted to have privacy or anonymity
    <LazyEye> yeah when I play on TG the server digs though my trash

    Arm yourself with knowledge: TG NS TF2 BF2

  10.  
  11. #66

    Wyzcrak's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Memphis, TN
    Posts
    14,267

    Re: New Look

    Quote Originally Posted by Trooper[SNPR] View Post
    If you arent complianing then dont take it personal.
    I'm not taking it "personal."

    My offense is taken from your using these forums to publicly (and arguably unqualifiedly) making vague and sweeping claims that "the same people" are "bitching", as it just creates drama. It puts the focus on the very person as much as the act, and, in this public venue, that's more harmful than it is helpful, regardless of where you place *me* in all of that.
    Steam Community? Add me. | Join #tacticalgamer | Search Results Legend | New Posts Forum Filter | Postbox Toggle | Live Thread Review | One Line Results | Free Remote, Encrypted Backup

    Darkilla: In short, NS is pretty much really fast chess. With guns. Apophis: I haven't seen anyone say that SM's are better than non-SMs. Nordbomber: This is THE first server I've seen where either side can comeback from out of seemingly nowhere with the right teamwork. en4rcment: I have NEVER experienced the type of gameplay that I have found here. Nightly I am amazed at the personalities and gaming talent. Zephyr: Apophis is clearly a highly sophisticated self-aware AI construct that runs on a highly modified toaster oven in Wyzcrak's basement.

  12.  

     
  13. #67

    CingularDuality's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dallas/Ft. Worth area of Texas, USA
    Age
    37
    Posts
    18,761

    Re: New Look

    Quote Originally Posted by Apophis View Post
    I know some people don't like it, but very few that don't like it have actually defined what they dislike about it or made suggestions for improvement.
    I don't care much for the yellow logo, but I don't mind the overall appearance of the new colors. My problem is with the contrast of the text on the background, it really makes my eyes hurt.

  14.  
  15. #68

    Pokerface's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    MD, USA
    Age
    33
    Posts
    5,914

    Re: New Look

    Quote Originally Posted by CingularDuality View Post
    I don't care much for the yellow logo, but I don't mind the overall appearance of the new colors. My problem is with the contrast of the text on the background, it really makes my eyes hurt.
    Seconded there.

    The user bars could probably use an overhaul to match the new scheme as well, but that's an icing-on-the-cake matter.

    NS Game Officer. TF2 Admin. BF2 Admin / Scripter. PM with issues.
    Tempus: Pokerface is nailing it right on the head. Everyone who is arguing against him is simply arguing against reality.
    <anmuzi> it is not permitted to have privacy or anonymity
    <LazyEye> yeah when I play on TG the server digs though my trash

    Arm yourself with knowledge: TG NS TF2 BF2

  16.  
  17. #69


    Apophis's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Northeast, USA
    Age
    39
    Posts
    9,963
    Blog Entries
    10

    Re: New Look

    Quote Originally Posted by Pokerface View Post
    Seconded there.

    The user bars could probably use an overhaul to match the new scheme as well, but that's an icing-on-the-cake matter.
    I'm not too keen on the yellow/gold logo either. I'm going to play with that a little bit this weekend.

    The user bars will also end up getting replaced.

    Diplomacy is the art of saying "good doggie" while looking for a bigger stick.

  18.  

     
  19. #70


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United states, TN
    Age
    39
    Posts
    3,072

    Re: New Look

    Hmm I just have a "feature request". It would be nice to have a "Games" section in the FAQ that has links to all of the Server rules and SOP's.
    Retired 6th DB

  20.  
  21. #71


    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,492

    Re: New Look

    I'm willing to help where I can, what needs help? I'm not good at any one particular thing, but I know how to do small amounts of lots of different things.
    Battlefield Admin(BF2 Rules) (BF2142 Rules)
    [volun2][medic][defense3][eng2][support]
    [sg-c1][gchq-c1][tog-c1][ma-c1][taw-c1][tg-c2]
    Support TG | Write for TacticalWiki | BF2 Sig. Generator | TS Help

  22.  
  23. #72


    Apophis's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Northeast, USA
    Age
    39
    Posts
    9,963
    Blog Entries
    10

    Re: New Look

    Quote Originally Posted by Wimpinator View Post
    Hmm I just have a "feature request". It would be nice to have a "Games" section in the FAQ that has links to all of the Server rules and SOP's.
    Asch and I have been working on different concepts in navigation. In the end, we're going to do you one better than what you ask. I think you'll be pleased.

    Diplomacy is the art of saying "good doggie" while looking for a bigger stick.

  24.  

     
  25. #73


    Apophis's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Northeast, USA
    Age
    39
    Posts
    9,963
    Blog Entries
    10

    Re: New Look

    Quote Originally Posted by perry View Post
    I'm willing to help where I can, what needs help? I'm not good at any one particular thing, but I know how to do small amounts of lots of different things.
    Well, all the usergroup tags need to get re-done to fit in with the new site. Is that up your alley? Where's Xink when you need him!

    Diplomacy is the art of saying "good doggie" while looking for a bigger stick.

  26.  
  27. #74


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United states, TN
    Age
    39
    Posts
    3,072

    Re: New Look

    Quote Originally Posted by Apophis View Post
    Asch and I have been working on different concepts in navigation. In the end, we're going to do you one better than what you ask. I think you'll be pleased.
    Excellent!
    Retired 6th DB

  28.  
  29. #75


    FBmantis's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,993

    Re: New Look

    Correct me if I'm wrong but the "Mark new posts as read" link I used to hit after browsing new posts seems to be MIA...?
    |TG-12th|mantis

  30.  

     

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


  
 

Back to top