+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Discussion: Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter / Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter - General Discussion - New Video Ghost Recon AW - Wow how the game look from this video can't wait for it to come out.
-
11-24-2005, 04:54 AM #1
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Ca
- Age
- 30
- Posts
- 312
New Video Ghost Recon AW
Wow how the game look from this video can't wait for it to come out. Point of No Return is new video of GR:AW on gametrailers.com and enjoy.
=Link Is Below=
http://www.gametrailers.com/gamepage.php?id=1693[TG-5th JTF] LuNiSiCx
5th Joint Task Force
5th Joint Task Force TacticalWiki
[squadl]
[ma-c1][ma-c2]
-
11-24-2005, 07:37 AM #2
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- Ottawa, Canada
- Posts
- 4,862
Re: New Video Ghost Recon AW
It looks good but the big question is if it will have the same kind of tactical game play the first game had. Pretty graphics will only take a game so far.
-
11-25-2005, 10:29 AM #3
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 503
Re: New Video Ghost Recon AW
Rainbow six:3 had pretty graphics. Did not last too long around here.
Yes I know ti is still around just not a big headliner
-
11-25-2005, 12:47 PM #4
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- Ottawa, Canada
- Posts
- 4,862
Re: New Video Ghost Recon AW
RvS had a lot of problems other than a lack of good game play. The mapping was off to a slow start since it took a lot of time to make a good map. There were plenty of bugs that UbiSoft just couldn't fix with each patch. It never got much modding support. To this day, the official SDK was never released.
GR never had an SDK but it did have a lot of good modding tools and built-in mod support since the first expansion. If GR:AW wants the same kind of success on the PC, it'll need good mod support and long lasting game play. The original GR made it easy to create missions but hard to create maps. This is where RvS did better. It used a popular map making tool and now has hundreds of maps where GR has a handful. Still, GR was better because those missions on the same old maps had very different objectives.
On the other hand, OFP is a great game but horrible graphics. Even the mods don't compare to what's out there now. The game play is great and allows for just about anything. It's not very popular around here though. It has a strong cult following but none of the glory GR got.
GR:AW has a lot to live up to. It's got to balance graphics and game play to get the most success with PC gamers.
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Bookmarks