-
03-24-2008, 05:30 AM #1
yall talk too much
ednos pointed out that after 8 hours of not looking at the ikariam forums here... its pretty much a short novel just to catch up... and i figured out (using rough numbers) this conclusion:
yall talk too much... 17 threads per day... (bf2 has maintained 8.2 per day) 150 posts per day (bf2 has maintained 134 per day) addicting lil game wouldnt you say?
oh btw my numbers could be off.. but not by much
-
03-24-2008, 06:05 AM #2
Re: yall talk too much
Yep, everyone's all excited about getting involved in this fine wee game!
Only thing I'd say is that it would be much easier to follow the forums if people stuck to the thread topic, and if they want to ask about/discuss something off-topic -> create a NEW TOPIC.
At least that way we'd know roughly what is going on in each thread!
-
03-24-2008, 06:52 AM #3
Re: yall talk too much
I would like to see the forums a bit neater aswell. Now I have been off topic in some threads but this is all getting ridiculous and way to confusing. Lets have the stickies as important things like:
- Who the officers of our allaince are.
- Who is who and where can they be found (this can be updated by one of the officers who can see the whole alliance).
- What our internal rules are.
- A request goods thread.
- And an FAQ thread.


"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
Winston Churchill
-
03-24-2008, 10:37 AM #4
Re: yall talk too much
We'll be working on SOPs, Guidelines and other helpfull stickies this week.
-
03-24-2008, 10:54 AM #5
Re: yall talk too much
This is a very sociable game. That's another reason why I like it.
|TG-12th|Undead

-
03-24-2008, 12:41 PM #6
Re: yall talk too much
The reason it's so popular is the whole free play at work thing... oh and it's unbelievably addictive and fun. I'm sure it'll settle down a bit in time.
-
03-24-2008, 06:30 PM #7
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)




.
.
.
Reply With Quote



Bookmarks