whistler

Do you mean something like this?

__________________

Mateo

Great! Where is the rest of it?

whistler

I thought you meant an additive to the graphics on the left hand side, under the name! I had a buddy from AGB whip this up for me.

__________________

Wyzcrak

Random, that's a great response.

__________________
Steam Community? Add me. | Join #tacticalgamer | Search Results Legend | New Posts Forum Filter | Postbox Toggle | Live Thread Review | One Line Results | Free Remote, Encrypted Backup

Darkilla: In short, NS is pretty much really fast chess. With guns. Apophis: I haven't seen anyone say that SM's are better than non-SMs. Nordbomber: This is THE first server I've seen where either side can comeback from out of seemingly nowhere with the right teamwork. en4rcment: I have NEVER experienced the type of gameplay that I have found here. Nightly I am amazed at the personalities and gaming talent. Root: Welcome to TG. Feel free to punctuate your sentences correctly. Monkerz: Its gonna take all my skills to beat those boys off in the future.

Root

Indeed it was. I'm troubled that anyone would ask if something tactically unsound is permitted, when the community we're part of is called Tactical Gamer. Even more so when....

... it's also taking you way too far away from your objective, and putting you in a position where you're of far more use to the OpFor.

What was it Dumbledore said about accidents happening anyway?

Instead you started it in a forum for discussing map layouts, their suitability for PCS play, and.... map specific tactics.

When I see a comment like that, directly following on from a comment like

All I see is a troll.

__________________

JoshZeitlin

What you "see" is someone looking for an answer - not an argument.

In this case, I didn't care to have tactical disagreements b/c in spite of ALL the valid logic, I've seen it work well.

If it was legal, I'd use it. Since it isn't, I wont.

__________________
Josh -
Some men will always be animals, while others ... they will be Men.

RandomGuy

Can you explain how the ledge was used, what happened and why it worked?

JoshZeitlin

I can try.. but I'm leaving out any advantages to be had in regard to recon.

The most obvious application comes in the fact that b/c its such a questionable spot, CTs initially do not expect to find anyone there. The element of surprise works well, and I have been killed at least twice blundering around the corner on my way to Courtyard. Sure I should be watching it, but lets face it, we all get lazy from time to time.

Now, once the T shows up there the first time,, the word is out. So, post suprise..
A) I've seen it used -SUCCESSFULLY mid round as an ambush position. CTs dont watch the left when they breach the bridge from Courtyard.
B) If you delay your move out and around the corner to where you can see the avenue, you cut off any CTs under the balcany from retreat.
C) It offers an excellent way of killing CTs just as they are evacing hosties as you can jump down and cut off the evac box. (Of course in this application you must have very creative circumstances to justify it. The only time it might work is if the CTs rushed fast enough through atrium that they had hosties moving before you had a chance to support the other Ts.)
D) Its a hop-skip-and-a-jump away from Hosties, so its not like you've overextended the team. T's covering couryard are farther from the hosties than you are.
E) Leaves more of the board unsafe for CTs - always a good thing.
F) Lets not forget, you ARE covering pipes.

This is all I could think of for right now.

(I know people will apply specific circumstances and disect this until its meaningless, but this is enough to justify the OPTION of going to the spot. I personally dont like the spot - I prefer to cover atrium or balcony - but after the second time I got killed from there, I wanted to know whether or not it was legal.)

__________________
Josh -
Some men will always be animals, while others ... they will be Men.