Welcome to Tactical Gamer

User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
Discussion: Natural Selection / Natural Selection - General Discussion - Natural Selection 2: Engine Change - In the latest Unknown Worlds Podcast #32, it was announced that they are moving away
  1. #1

    ImAWuss's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    New Hampshire, USA
    Age
    32
    Posts
    559
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Question Natural Selection 2: Engine Change

    In the latest Unknown Worlds Podcast #32, it was announced that they are moving away from the Source Engine. How do you think this will effect the audience behind NS? I think it's a bold move, but they seem to have great ideas, and an understanding of what they want.

    Do you support this move?
    birdie_in_Texas:ok..i feel stupid here..what is "NS"..? Wyzcrak:Natural Selection. Don't feel at a loss for not knowing the acronym. Feel at a loss for not having experienced the game.

  2.  
  3. #2

    MagnaCentipede's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,082
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Natural Selection 2: Engine Change

    For one, I'm certainly not going to try it out, despite many, or at least a couple, TG/TF2 players suggesting this game to me, because my gaming needs are currently satisfied, and thus am only interested in a new game if it is without a marginal cost to me.

    However, the coders should use whichever engine is best suited for what they wish to create. By creating the best mod they can, the base-game's popularity is insignificant because people will buy the game for the mod as long as they know the mod is worth the price. On the other hand, a poor mod will struggle to earn a strong player base even if their engine game is popular.

  4.  
  5. #3

    FooKer's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    57
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Natural Selection 2: Engine Change

    I like the change tbh. The fact that they can build it to their needs instead of modifying the engine to theirs is a good thing.

  6.  

     
  7. #4

    Skud's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Vermont
    Age
    23
    Posts
    8,327
    Blog Entries
    19
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Natural Selection 2: Engine Change

    It's very very...ambitious. My only concern is the current amount of work that's now meaningless by both devs and fans because of the switch.

    It's for the... better... But there are always unforeseen consequences (Dr. Freeman...)
    Skud
    My Twitch Stream
    NS2 Captains games all night every Friday!
    Looking for brahs to come fight crime wit me
    Must be able to bench press with me after our shift
    Shirts are optional... Body Oil is not


  8.  
  9. #5

    Ferris Bueller's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    1123 6536 5321
    Age
    32
    Posts
    9,177
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Natural Selection 2: Engine Change

    This just means it'll be another 5 years before NS2 comes out.

  10.  
  11. #6

    FooKer's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    57
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Natural Selection 2: Engine Change

    You'd be surprised actually, I think it's a bit further along then most people think.

  12.  

     
  13. #7

    Donat's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    369
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Natural Selection 2: Engine Change

    Well they made decoda and such FOR source... so i don't know exactly how far along they are. It will be a long road of testing and bug solving i bet. many map makers are probly pissed. O well, just going to be playin spore, SCII and such till it comes out.

  14.  
  15. #8

    Ferris Bueller's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    1123 6536 5321
    Age
    32
    Posts
    9,177
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Natural Selection 2: Engine Change

    Donat, every time I see your avatar, all can hear is "exterminate....exterminate..."
    Dr. Who fans will understand the reference.

  16.  
  17. #9


    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Age
    28
    Posts
    19
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Natural Selection 2: Engine Change

    it is a dalek isn't it? I never put 2 and 2 together, lol. +2 points for donat

  18.  

     
  19. #10


    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Natural Selection 2: Engine Change

    Quote Originally Posted by Ferris Bueller View Post
    This just means it'll be another 5 years before NS2 comes out.
    I would greatly enjoy having a new NS game to play in which a competitive community can support itself once again. That being said, the facts are they just got an artist and a couple pieces of concept art quite recently. If they had started coding the game there would have been some indication, because that would give a lot of us an optimistic view on progress. Now they announce a new engine which takes years to configure and perfect. I have heard about larger companies spending four years or more to configure their first engine. So if NS2 is released in five years that would be good 'cause, now it seems they are trying to tell us we have no idea what we want to do and this game will not release. Think about the podcasts and how they come off as indecisive, not to mention lazy and unmotivated before getting frustrated by this post.

  20.  
  21. #11


    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Age
    28
    Posts
    19
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Natural Selection 2: Engine Change

    A) Apparently Max has been working on this engine since 2005.
    B) All the game play code they already had in place ports directly to new engine because it was all written in LUA, and they add their LUA hooks into this engine
    C) their points about working with in the source engine are valid, Its a big piece of code, with all kinds of weird ins and outs.

    I think the work load change is probably about the same between using source and this engine from what I can hear, but I share your fears. The engines you are talking about taking 4 years to develop are cutting edge designed to be broadly useful so they can license it over and over again. Many of the features in such an engine would not be utilized by the NS2 dev team because they don't have the budget for all the art assets. Also in my experience programing takes less time than art development, particularly if the team is careful about through testing during the entire build process. I think NS would really benefit from its own engine. A lot of stuff in NS seems like a dirty hack to get something to work in an engine in a way it totally wasn't designed for, namely commander mode. I haven't lost hope yet.

  22.  
  23. #12


    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Age
    28
    Posts
    19
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Natural Selection 2: Engine Change

    A) Apparently Max has been working on this engine since 2005.
    B) All the game play code they already had in place ports directly to new engine because it was all written in LUA, and they add their LUA hooks into this engine
    C) their points about working with in the source engine are valid, Its a big piece of code, with all kinds of weird ins and outs.

    I think the work load change is probably about the same between using source and this engine from what I can hear, but I share your fears. The engines you are talking about taking 4 years to develop are cutting edge designed to be broadly useful so they can license it over and over again. Many of the features in such an engine would not be utilized by the NS2 dev team because they don't have the budget for all the art assets. Also in my experience programing takes less time than art development, particularly if the team is careful about through testing during the entire build process. I think NS would really benefit from its own engine. A lot of stuff in NS seems like a dirty hack to get something to work in an engine in a way it totally wasn't designed for, namely commander mode. I haven't lost hope yet.

  24.  

     
  25. #13

    Sirusblk's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Placentia, California, United States
    Age
    24
    Posts
    1,795
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Natural Selection 2: Engine Change

    So did they announce what engine they're gonna use? I'd probably guess the Unreal Engine but I'd rather not have everything dipped in Vaseline thank you very much

  26.  
  27. #14

    Donat's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    369
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Natural Selection 2: Engine Change

    their making / using their own creation afaik

  28.  
  29. #15

    FooKer's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    57
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Natural Selection 2: Engine Change

    Quote Originally Posted by Donat View Post
    Well they made decoda and such FOR source... so i don't know exactly how far along they are. It will be a long road of testing and bug solving i bet. many map makers are probly pissed. O well, just going to be playin spore, SCII and such till it comes out.
    By the way... "Decoda is a professional development environment for debugging Lua script in your applications."

    Not made FOR source

  30.  

     
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


  
 

Back to top